As the champagne corks pop . . .

Yachtgate leaves voters with the uncomfortable feeling that
the super-rich own our politicians.

At times like this, I think of Stafford Cripps. A vegetarian and teetotaller, who reputedly lunched exclusively on carrots, Cripps was Labour chancellor during the postwar austerity years. Even after he devalued the pound, the public gave him a positive approval rating of 11 per cent. Before that, despite strict rationing and income tax at nine shillings (45p), it was 33 per cent. Cripps came from a wealthy background but, to look at him, you wouldn’t have known it. For most of his time in office, he was very thin and very ill, and he died shortly after stepping down. He was described – by a diplomat, not a Labour colleague – as “the nearest thing to a saint I have ever met”.

How unlike our own dear contemporary politicians, for some of whom life seems to be one champagne reception after another, and many of whom so visibly enjoy the high life. Corfu isn’t at all exotic, or even particularly fashionable. But there’s one almost ludicrously beautiful enclave on the north-eastern coast which is much favoured by the people with the kind of cut-glass accent you normally find in Surrey and Bucks.

It was there, as most of us now know, that an extraordinary political drama unfolded this summer, involving a luxury villa, a yacht, an expensive restaurant and lots of parties and dinners. With British businesses going bust by the day, thousands being evicted from their homes and pensioners facing winter with the heating turned down, this does not sound to me like the sort of thing that will enhance the country’s admiration for its rulers.

But I’m old Labour. As, I suppose, was Cripps.

Rothschild thought it jolly bad form to leak juicy gossip exchanged between rich folk

It will perhaps be called Corfugate or Yachtgate. Here’s what we know. The villa belongs to the Rothschild family who bought the land before the Second World War along with a section of the Albanian coast opposite so as not to spoil their view. The yacht belongs to Russia’s richest man, Oleg Deripaska, who made his fortune in aluminium and also owns Leyland Daf. The restaurant is the Agni Taverna, allegedly Corfu’s best, which people like to say can only be reached by boat, though it is easily accessible by road or, for that matter, foot. Some of the partying and dining was on the yacht, some at the villa, with Nat Rothschild playing host. He will become Baron Rothschild when the present one dies and, as well as being heir to the family fortune, has his own hedge fund. He is said to spend more time sleeping in his private jet than in his five houses. The guests included Peter Mandelson, the former EU trade commissioner now restored to the cabinet as Business Secretary; George Osborne, the shadow chancellor; Andrew Feldman, the Tories’ chief fundraiser and an old Oxford friend of David Cameron’s; assorted media figures, including Rupert Murdoch; and various PR folk, such as Roland Rudd, a City publicist said to be worth £50m.

Very briefly – you will bear in mind that everybody denies what everybody else says – there are three allegations. First, Mandelson told Osborne at Agni that he thought Gordon Brown was a bit of a plonker, or words to that effect. Second, Mandelson and Deripaska have “links” (a newspaper word which means “we think something dodgy is going on, but we’re not sure what”). Mandelson signed off an EU decision to lift tariffs on aluminium imports, obviously favourable to an aluminium tycoon. In Corfu, he stayed on the Russian’s yacht.

Though he claimed never to have met Deripaska before the aluminium decision, it turned out that they dined in Moscow in January 2005, with Nat Rothschild also present. Third, Osborne and Feldman talked to Deripaska about a possible donation to Tory funds, though the law states British parties cannot take money from foreigners.

The first two allegations probably reached the press because Osborne started leaking to discredit the new Business Secretary. Rothschild spilled the beans on the Deripaska donation, in a letter to the Times, because he thought it jolly bad form for Osborne – an Oxford contemporary and fellow member of the exclusive Bullingdon Club – to leak juicy gossip exchanged between privileged folk and allow the unwashed to read it in the papers.

My mind goes back now, not only to Cripps, but also to the 1930s when politicians, aristocrats, diplomats and businessmen met at country house weekends and decided Hitler was quite a decent chap who should be allowed to have most of what he wanted; and to the early 1960s when half the ruling class seemed to be involved in weekend sex orgies, complete with specially hired prostitutes, on country estates.
Those matters concerned only the Tories, but this one now involves both government and opposition, showing, in the northern phrase, how they all piss in the same pot. The details, obscured by denials and counter-denials, will escape most voters. But there is a sense, perhaps more in the middle class than the working class, that a super-class of rich people lives on a different planet from the rest of us and most politicians have been bought by them.

While the rest of us get screwed, our rulers, enjoying parties and freebies, making deals and exchanging gossip, are too busy to care.

Peter Wilby edited the New Statesman from 1998-2005

6 comments

gnuneo's picture

exploding badger: you should read about the Stanford Prison Experiment:

http://www.prisonexp.org/

it is not so much that these people are sociopaths, or naturally lacking in human empathy/compassion, they are simply in a circle where to be concerned with 'normal citizens' is to be unkewl - aka "Simply Not Done, Old Boy". In previous centuries, with less democratic aspersions, it would have been called "Going Native" to do so, even about the other classes in their own society.

where does it come from? Partly from having a segregated schooling system, where certain classes still read pretty much the same books, are told the same historic BS, and are indoctrinated into the same 'secret societies' that leads to such mental gymnastics as above.

they are not evil (unless they are deliberately choosing to follow what they personally believe to BE evil, of course), they are just misguided, and their natural self-interest does the rest.

peter: excellent. If there's one thing wannabe power-brokers hate, its to show they are behaving like the little school-boys they really are, rather than the Illuminated Statesmen they crave to be seen as. Remember how one of the strongest arguments against the televising of the Commons was that the Public would "lose respect" for their representatives?

we can only hope their Age is now drawing to a close, and that it goes as peacefully as possible in a Liberal Evolution.

sennewisaexus888's picture

Mervyn King wants us back to boring banking which might help the FTSE 100 set a floor of 4,000 from which we might have prospects of economic recovery. It's had no sustainable hold on 4,000 since 10 October. If it hits 3,500, and fails to hold, you really will need the Prozac. So who is Secretary of State for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform and what is he doing to help?

I'm bored all right. Mandelson, 5 minutes in the cabinet and now the house of lords, and here he is again - protesting he has been cleared by an enquiry of wrongdoing after looking as though he was at it. Last time it was Hinduja, this time it's Deripaska. We know he has no problem with people being filthy rich, but does filthy have to be the operative word? We haven't seen the report into Fritz Harald Wenig and the Chinese Candles yet.

How can Mandelson be giving his full attention to business regeneration while he deals with his error or judgement over Deripaska? No sooner in BERR than he is attacking the human rights of women who have had children by treating flexible working hours as a piece of merely dispensable business red tape. What this shows is that Gordon Brown's professed empathy with the innocent victims of his failed economic policies is so much worthless hoo haa.

writeon's picture

Apart from wealth and power in vast quantities, what motivates these people? They apparently know how to hate, but what of love? Self love, they clearly have that, but what about other people? There don't seem to be many women involved or children do there? What's all this dealing and striving for? It's like they belong to a cult. A cult of very powerful men who want to rule the world, but why? Power for nothing appart from itself seems so hollow to me. After the first ten or twenty million who cares? Is this appetite for vast wealth just a substitute for inadequacy, for some kind of hidden, internal, emptyness? And can money really substitute for that? I have my doubts.

I've earned and wasted more money than most people will ever have in an entire lifetime. Easy come, easy go. I never respected money at all, probably because I didn't really have to do much get it. But I didn't love it and I didn't worship it. One gets the distinct impression that these guys have sold their souls. I suspect the myth of King Midas was created because of people like them.

Roger  Fah-Fah's picture

I own a yacht and we need more voters to buy yachts and not rowing boats! they get in the way at sea!

john problem's picture

Oh dear. One had hoped our leaders were smarter than it now appears they are. MPs got away with their kitchen make-overs and free potted plants for years, but here are some of our brightest brains who didn't have the nous to keep their collars up, or stand behind the mizzen mast, when discussing the dosh with the wealthies. Where will we find some really savvy men to lead us into the dark future? British politics is doomed unless more devious minds come forward.

explodingbadger1's picture

The same idea "that a super-class of rich people lives on a different planet from the rest of us and most politicians have been bought by them" has struck me
on several occasions. You have to wonder what kind of "human being" involves themselves in such horrors as the Iraq and Vietnam war. Its very easy to think these people are like you and me but the more and more I think about it I realise they can't be.
I am not totally sure what the answer is but I think the following may help:

Proportional representation.

Public funding of parties.

Prevent politians having other jobs during their time in office.

Latest tweets