Return to: Home | Politics | UK Politics

Time for universal free school meals

Sharon Hodgson

Published 27 May 2008

Labour's Sharon Hodgson says universal free school meals are a vote winner and would boost the nation's health

If one thing is clear from the recent round of elections it is that voters don’t think much to the choice being served up by our politicians. That is why I’m working with fellow MPs, trade unions and charities to add an option to the menu. A free, locally sourced, school meal for each and every child. Think about it. It would benefit our nation’s health and education as well as the environment

The current generation of children could be the first in over a century whose life expectancy falls. If we are to lay claim to truly progressive politics and hit our child poverty targets then we need to rediscover the relationship between bold ambition and big thinking. Free school meals would be one way of doing this.

On a visit to Sweden, I saw how integral lunch time can be to the school curriculum. Classes and teachers ate together as a unit. The food was tasty, healthy and appetising. All the children tucked in heartily, helped themselves to seconds and tidied up after themselves before retuning to wipe down the tables. Many of the teachers I spoke to were shocked to discover this was not common practice in the UK. I didn’t have the guts to tell them that our dinner ladies have to compete with an average of 23 fast food outlets per secondary school.

We can’t blame the parents, or the kids. The cost of school meals to parents is expected to hit £2 per child in the near future. It is little wonder packed lunches are viewed are popular but these do not guarantee a healthy balanced diet. Neither can you expect a teenager to stay in school at lunchtime when all their mates are off to the chip shop, that’s why stay on site policies need to be enforced across the board.

Whether it is local fish, root vegetables or fresh fruit, we are lucky enough to have a tremendous amount of regional diversity in our food. This should be reflected in the nation’s school food. Every pound spent on local produce is worth twice as much to the local economy so we should aim to meet the Soil Association’s target that 50% of the food used in school meals should be sourced locally.

There is a clear link between lifestyle and educational achievement. The increased concentration which comes with a healthy diet is a bonus for pupils and teachers alike as neither has to suffer from the inevitable sugar spikes and lethargy brought on by snacks and stodge.

Of course, there is a cost attached to such a sweeping change. My own research suggests universal free school meals would rack up a bill of £1 billion. Government officials have told me the tab is more likely to be £2 billion, either way as far as I’m concerned it is worth it.

Obesity is estimated to be costing the public purse £3.5 billion a year already and this will only increase without immediate action.

Almost 70 MPs have now signed a motion calling for free school meals to be piloted across the country. I’ve set up the FULL campaign group to make the case in Parliament. We are looking carefully at what lessons can be learnt from elsewhere in the UK including Hull and Scotland where pilots have been very successful. Ministers are aware of the campaign which has been described by Minister for the Cabinet Office Ed Miliband as ‘ingenious’.

In my view it is not ingenious, it's obvious and I’ll continue urging ministers to use their loaves. Ensuring our children eat brain food, not fast food will pay dividends in the long run. It might not be as cheap as chips but to an electorate suffering rising food prices it might just look too good to resist.

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

6 comments from readers

PaulCeltic
05 June 2008 at 15:05

Why then did Labour oppose the Free School Meals bill in the Scottish Parliament in 2002?

Why did they oppose the Free School Meals pilot in the Scottish parliament last year?

gnuneo
28 June 2008 at 04:40

sharon: i agree with every one of your policies here, and i support you 100%, and hope you get this through.

couple of points though, i would like to raise - you could even take it as suggestions on speech style. :)

"If one thing is clear from the recent round of elections it is that voters don’t think much to the choice being served up by our politicians. That is why I’m working with fellow MPs, trade unions and charities to add an option to the menu. A free, locally sourced, school meal for each and every child."

you sound like a cold-hearted, calculating professional politician, who is interested more in winning votes than for the actual improvement itself. This may work on the Nuremberg Rallies - oops sorry, i meant "Party konferences" - but sounding like that is just going to lose you votes in the general public. Beleive in what you are fighting for, don't preface it with "we found that people will vote for us if we do this...".

"Neither can you expect a teenager to stay in school at lunchtime when all their mates are off to the chip shop, that’s why stay on site policies need to be enforced across the board."

and again - you do realise your authoritarian tendencies are openly on show here, don't you? So much better to say - "we intend to make the food at schools so enjoyable that students will happily eat them, insead of the chip shop down the road.", or words to that effect. Banning any competition just ensures that you can evade making the food better, or at minimum makes chips seem 'rebellious', and thus higher value. Make the food free, and definitely make it better and local, but leave open competition. Even if you do get warm feelings from being able to order people around using the Law. :P

because of these two slips, that you are clearly not aware of, i am quite wary of you - but i support your motion so much, that its worth helping you a bit. I tell you what, get this through this year, don't leave it as a vague pre-election pledge, because giving the nation's children healthy free meals, combined with the boost to local productions and community, is such an "obvious" move, i guarantee such a policy would win, or win back, a great proportion of the electorate whose natural affiliation is with the labour party. And be warned - the tories may pick up on it as well. Don't do it for votes, do it because you really care about the lives and health of the nation's children, and you will win many votes. Do it for votes, and you will get far less votes.

the paradox of political authenticity. :)

and again - the best of luck, go and sit outside headmaster brown's office till he sees sense. LOL ;)

gnuneo
07 July 2008 at 17:09

addendum: whilst you were there in sweden, i hope you realised there were far more differences in the pedagogic approach than just decent school meals?

please view:

http://www.teachers.tv/video/12090

and as someone who studied pedagogy in DK, i would strongly recommend reading this page, to grasp the direction scandinavian, german and dutch pedagogy is moving - and why if we do not move to follow them, we in the UK will fall far far behind.

http://www.educationfutures.org/Respect.htm

perhaps a future mission for you to take up?

btw, although i am sure this won't affect you at all, if you DO get this policy through, even if Labour loses the next election, *you* will be remembered for a long time for what you have achieved, and given to our Nation's young. Give it your best, shaz, please!

gnuneo
07 July 2008 at 17:12

sorry, one final bit of reading:

http://www.childresearch.net/RESOURCE/RESEARCH/2002/DAVIES.H...

a comparison of UK and our major competitors education systems.

gnuneo
09 October 2008 at 01:42

however some UK schools ARE facing up to teaching democracy not only in theory, but also practice:

http://www.teachers.tv/video/3480

and of course there is Summerhill School!

gnuneo
24 October 2008 at 15:30

nick nettles, 'robotic children'. An ecologist's view of modern education.

http://www.theecologist.org/pages/archive_detail.asp?content...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

Read More

Vote!

Was the government wrong to sack David Nutt?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker