How Qatar bought London
The Shard, Harrods, Barclays, the Olympics Village - Qatar owns them all.
By George Eaton Published 04 July 2012
In his encomium to the Shard, London’s newest and tallest skyscraper, Boris Johnson declared that it was “a symbol of how London is powering its way out of the global recession”. Had he substituted “Qatar” for “London”, the city’s mayor might have had a point. The 72-storey tower, which was inaugurated on 5 July, is 95 per cent owned by Qatar’s sovereign wealth fund and is the crowning asset in the Gulf state’s acquisition spree.
When the Shard’s public viewing gallery opens in February 2013, it will offer an apt vantage point from which to observe the emirate’s treasures. To the west lie Harrods, acquired by the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA) in 2010 for £1.5bn, and One Hyde Park, the world’s most expensive apartment block, which is owned by Project Grande (Guernsey), a joint venture between the Qatari prime minister, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber al-Thani, and the property developers the Candy brothers. To the east lie the Olympic village, sold to the QIA subsidiary Qatari Diar for £557m last August, and Barclays Bank, 6.67 per cent-owned by the QIA, which is now its largest shareholder.
We are everywhere
In its long march through Britain’s institutions, Qatar has also acquired 26 per cent of Sainsbury’s, a 20 per cent stake in the London Stock Exchange, the Chelsea Barracks site and the US embassy building in Grosvenor Square. In the UK’s “Wimbledon” economy – we merely provide the venue and setting for the world’s financial players – Qatar is the Grand Slam champion. As the Sandhurst-educated sheikh boasted in a rare interview with the FT in 2010, “We are investing everywhere. Even your Harrods – we took it.” In the case of the care-home operator Southern Cross, the purchase of half of the firm’s 744 properties by the QIA led to it paying £100m in rent above the market rate, contributing to its collapse last year.
Where London is concerned, foreign ownership is increasingly the rule, rather than the exception. A study by Cambridge University last year, Who Owns the City?, found that 52 per cent of the Square Mile’s office stock is held by foreign investors, up from just 8 per cent in 1980. The former City minister Paul Myners has argued that “it is easier to take over a company here than anywhere else in the world”.
One need not be a “buy British” protectionist to be troubled by this trend. The unchecked rise in foreign ownership has left the UK’s economy more vulnerable to global shocks and its government less willing to dissent. Justin Bowden of the GMB union, which picketed al-Thani’s meeting with the Queen at Windsor Castle in 2010, notes that “Britain has to ensure that it never falls out with Qatar, or one day we might wake up and find this Gulf state has us at its mercy”.
When our politicians hail the Shard as a “new London icon” they are more right than they realise. There could be no better tribute to the city’s plutocratic economy than the Qataris’ gleaming petrotower.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists


18 comments
magician3all
arabonly
anime3as
animok3a
delegnt3a
mexaty3a
animeta7a
mexaty3a
animes3t
mexa2at
3arb-anime
anim5k
albrqn3t
mexat3an
top3film
z7may
z7mhat
ta7ata
animeyate
mnhosat
mokmsyat
animeca3fe
mazaryte
animeyzo
animesnipat
anime-bnatc
banatm5dern
star5at
monaystat
mal7zat
zol7at
kol7at
animoyat
foxyat
maz7kat
3solaty
kool7at
ta7oy
mal7oy
zalyta
ma7aryat
sokolat
barn7ty
tey5at
d5olat
caloyat
anim3snipe
sadt3ars
animeonlye
nsf7
3solat
mnoms
magicians4all
animexyt
mexyt
delegnet
London is a cold shthole anyway. Its Anglo inhabitants ought just to emigrate to Australia where they can make themselves useful and have a sunnier life. The Arabs love the rain. Let them have all of it...
The problem is Qatar is a shitty country along with Saudi, Israel and Bahrain. The people are probably fine but the leaders are shitty.
"one day we might wake up and find this Gulf state has us at its mercy"
What are they going to do? Shut Harrods and tear down the Shard? Sell the US embassy? Sell their stake in Barclays (at a huge loss)? Let them have all their useless toys. All the money they get from the rest of the world for their oil and gas has to come back one way or another, so why not sell them gilded concrete and make them spend billions to put on a football tournament in the desert.
If you owe the bank $1m, the bank owns you. If you owe the bank $1bn, you own the bank.
Baksheesh Boris! Really does a great rendition of 'London Belongs to Me' Nominally, at any libor, mate.
Mustapha
china is the real deal in terms of power and future power, it longer wants to buy western government debt and therefore once the printing presses cease you will see the price of debt go through the roof, including the UK. this is why the US is effectively bust.
What xenophobic nonsense. By Mr Eaton's faulty logic, Citigroup is owned by Saudi Arabia, and all of the US is owned by China. A very tabloid article indeed. Lack of understanding of economics or of basic political realities.
The writer needs reminding that currently parked in the Gulf waters are the UK warship HMS Daring and the US Nimitz class supercarrier, the USS Abraham Lincoln, among other military assets. Tell me, what would be more scary: if tomorrow Qatar Holdings dropped all shares of Harrods on the market, or if the HMS Daring dropped a Scud missile on Doha?
On the same note, while Qatar gains a foothold in UK supermarkets and luxury flats, the UK already has a foothold in Qatar's military training colleges and air bases. So who is beholden to whom?
On a more serious note, the sober reality is that the alliance between Gulf Arab states and the UK (and US) is one of convenience and mutual benefit, at least ostensibly. The British government can only be happy to see foreign capital propping up domestic firms at a time of economic hardship. But have Qatar try to acquire any stake in BAE systems for example, and then see the UK government's reaction. I presume it won't react favourably.
Well said.
what is it Qatar actually bought from london as last time i checked, Harrods was own by an Egyptian who couldn't get residency, canary wharf was a conglomerate of investor mainly Canadian, us embassy they bought from the yanks so all these plots were second hand foreign ownership and do not really impact a difference that much of the UK, Qatar is on a spending spree at the minute with its new found wealth the art scene, properties not just in the UK but globally, why? strategic planning ahead of the world cup, no point hosting the world cup if many cant even place it on the map, but what fascinates me from a country that no one other than locals can own land, is that they can pursue the purchase of so much land abroad double standards with the capitals in all the wrong places
In 1972 a friend at Wales Gas, he from Kuwait, said in a friendly way, "You know we are just loving Britain, and our Oil Rich countries want to buy our way into Britain and make our economy strong here for the time when the oil runs out and the Arab lands are again nothing". " We will invest in property, in banking and within retail distribution", It will ensure we have important control of the economy and can maintain a strong Arab leverage between the USA and Europe and be a strong Global player long after the sands have engulfed our former lands and nothing left but town on the coasts." We will run a good economy here, it will be a role model for all the World, to follow".
Many laughed at his suggestion and now buy their newspaper, their petrol and most groceries from Arab controlled suppliers, indeed then they go down the bank and pay their Arab shareholders a pittance of what they ought if their had still been a policy within the benefits system of "you only get out if you have paid in'.
Next time you go to your local Arab owned store - then have a nice chat to the assistant whom will not be English, nor British, as when you speak to the assistants and they tell you, like my local newsagents "I am going home for six weeks", even though he was born here.
Does anyone remember a person in the newsagent that speaks English as a mother language, and never goes home?