War is peace, ignorance is strength

John Pilger

Published 15 October 2009

Obama, the man of peace, is planning another war to add to his impressive record

Barack Obama, winner of the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize, is planning another war to add to his impressive record. In Afghanistan, his agents routinely extinguish wedding parties, farmers and construction workers with weapons such as the innovative Hellfire missile, which sucks the air out of your lungs. According to the UN, 338,000 Afghan infants are dying under the Obama-led alliance, which permits only $29 per head annually to be spent on medical care.

Within weeks of his inauguration, Obama started a new war in Pakistan, causing more than a million people to flee their homes. In threatening Iran - which his secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said she was prepared to "obliterate" - Obama lied that the Iranians were covering up a "secret nuclear facility", knowing that it had already been reported to the International Atomic Energy Authority. In colluding with the only nuclear-armed power in the Middle East, he bribed the Palestinian Authority to suppress a UN judgment that Israel had committed crimes against humanity in its assault on Gaza - crimes made possible with US weapons whose shipment Obama secretly approved before his inauguration.

The old dog whistle test

At home, the man of peace has approved a military budget exceeding that of any year since the end of the Second World War while presiding over a new kind of domestic repression. During the recent G20 meeting in Pittsburgh, hosted by Obama, militarised police attacked peaceful protesters with something called the Long-Range Acoustic Device, not seen before on US streets. Mounted in the turret of a small tank, it blasted a piercing noise as tear gas and pepper gas were fired indiscriminately. It is part of a new arsenal of "crowd-control munitions" supplied by military contractors such as Raytheon. In Obama's Pentagon-controlled "national security state", the concentration camp at Guantanamo Bay, which he promised to close, remains open, and "rendition", secret assassinations and torture continue.

The Nobel Peace Prize-winner's latest war is largely secret. On 15 July, Washington finalised a deal with Colombia that gives the US seven giant military bases. "The idea," reported the Associated Press, "is to make Colombia a regional hub for Pentagon operations . . . nearly half the continent can be covered by a C-17 [military transport] without refuelling", which "helps achieve the regional engagement strategy".

Translated, this means Obama is planning a "rollback" of the independence and democracy that the people of Bolivia, Venezuela, Ecuador andParaguay have achieved against the odds, along with a historic regional co-operation that rejects the notion of a US "sphere of influence". The Colombian regime, which backs death squads and has the continent's worst human rights record, has received US military support second in scale only to Israel. Britain provides military training. Guided by US military satellites, Colombian paramilitaries now infiltrate Venezuela with the goal of overthrowing the democratic government of Hugo Chávez, which George W Bush failed to do in 2002.

Obama's war on peace and democracy in Latin America follows a style he has demonstrated since the coup against the democratic president of Honduras, Manuel Zelaya, in June. Zelaya had increased the minimum wage, granted subsidies to small farmers, cut back interest rates and reduced poverty. He planned to break a US pharmaceutical monopoly and manufacture cheap generic drugs. Although Obama has called for Zelaya's reinstatement, he refuses to condemn the coup-makers and to recall the US ambassador or the US troops who train the Honduran forces determined to crush a popular resistance. Zelaya has been repeatedly refused a meeting with Obama, who has approved an IMF loan of $164m to the illegal regime. The message is clear and familiar: thugs can act with impunity on behalf of the US.

Obama, the smooth operator from Chicago via Harvard, was enlisted to restore what he calls "leadership" throughout the world. The Nobel Prize committee's decision is the kind of cloying reverse racism that has beatified the man for no reason other than he is a member of a minority and attractive to liberal sensibilities, if not to the Afghan children he kills. This is the Call of Obama. It is not unlike a dog whistle: inaudible to most, irresistible to the besotted and boneheaded. "When Obama walks into a room," gushed George Clooney, "you want to follow him somewhere, anywhere."

Extreme and dangerous

The great voice of black liberation Frantz Fanon understood this. In The Wretched of the Earth, he described the "intermediary [whose] mission has nothing to do with transforming the nation: it consists, prosaically, of being the transmission line between the nation and a capitalism, rampant though camouflaged". Because political debate has become so debased in our media monoculture - Blair or Brown; Brown or Cameron - race, gender and class can be used as seductive tools of propaganda and diversion. In Obama's case, what matters, as Fanon pointed out in an earlier era, is not the intermediary's "historic" elevation, but the class he serves. After all, Bush's inner circle was probably the most multiracial in presidential history. There was Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, Clarence Thomas, all dutifully serving an extreme and dangerous power.

Britain has seen its own Obama-like mysticism. The day after Blair was elected in 1997, the Observer predicted that he would create "new worldwide rules on human rights" while the Guardian rejoiced at the "breathless pace [as] the floodgates of change burst open". When Obama was elected last November, Denis MacShane MP, a devotee of Blair's bloodbaths, unwittingly warned us: "I shut my eyes when I listen to this guy and it could be Tony. He is doing the same thing that we did in 1997."

Next week: Mehdi Hasan

Post this article to

  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • newsvine
  • Reddit

10 comments from readers

mohammedmassoudmorsi
15 October 2009 at 11:26

Dear John,

Your thoughts are - luckily - shared by millions of people worldwide.

I had the opportunity chance of meeting Erasto Reyes here in Copenhagen on monday the 12th of October. As you might know, he is a representative of the Honduras: El Frente Nacional de Resistencia contra el Golpe de Estado en Honduras and also a prominent leader of the Bloque Popular.

In his own words he told me (roughly translated): "Giving Obama the peace price is like giving Israel a golden cup for killing of the Palestinian people"

Indeed war is peace and indeed any criticism of powerful interests is almost becoming defacto unacceptable.

“’The ruling classes have in their hands the army, money, the schools, the churches and the press. In the schools they kindle patriotism in the children by means of histories describing their own people as the best of all peoples and always in the right. Among adults they kindle it by spectacles, jubilees, monuments, and by a lying patriotic press.’” (Tolstoy, Government is Violence - Essays on Anarchism and Pacifism, Phoenix Press, 1990, p.82)

brgds

Morsi

nawawimohamad
15 October 2009 at 14:39

Obama like all US presidents are just puppets. They have no will of their own and are swayed around by the lobbyists. The best potrayal of the US presidential election and the eventual power of influence is by the film "All the President's Men" (1976) with Robert Redford starrring as Bob Woodward.

Daniele
15 October 2009 at 19:48

A deeply depressing article. Unfortunately I fear that it is depicting the sad realities of the "New World Order." America continues to do what it has done for so long , rule the world with only its own narrow and selfish interest in mind. Business as usual. Obama is just a nice human face hiding good old ugly America. So many are still being fooled!

The Nobel Peace Prize is a triumph for America's PR.

Ian MacLeod
15 October 2009 at 21:55

The Nobel Committee has already said they gave him the Peace Prize in order to manipulate some stocks. I guess they have to get their money somewhere.

Obama is articulate and intelligent in SOME ways, and he has no loyalties or morals at all. He'll take the easy road whenever he can, and his promises are standard-issue "campaign promises." Worthless. He appointed a lot of Bush's old Neocon gang to high positions in the government, and they're advising him. Little wonder there's no real change.

A good talker might someone into bed with him, but it won't work in the long term because all talk and no action soon becomes obvious. And so it has. He's gone back on promise after promise, and I see no reason for him to change a pattern that has worked for him. He'll be a one-term president, too, unless his corporate owners steal the next election for him, which they might. He's certainly not getting in their way. At all, I'm sad to say.

Ian MacLeod

Activist PRN, Nonprofit, Nonpartisan, 501(C)(3) Corporation.

http://painreliefnetwork.org/

Veteran, Disabled, Chronic Intractable Pain Patient, 26 years

Primum, non nocere!

Illegitimis non carborundum!

Gideon Polya
16 October 2009 at 13:45

Excellent article by John Pilger.

However Big Brother’s complete declaration in George Orwell’s “1984” was “War is peace, ignorance is strength, slavery is freedom and 2 plus 2 does not equal 4”.

The resolute failure of the Western mainstream media and politicians to acknowledge the enslavement of 4 million Occupied Palestinians, 29 million Occupied Iraqis and 27 million Occupied Afghans asserts that “slavery is freedom”.- their failure to acknowledge the post-invasion violent and non-violent excess deaths in the Occupied Palestinian, Iraqi and Afghan Territories of 0.2 million, 2.3 million and 3-7 million, respectively, declares that “2 plus 2 does not equal 4”.

The Nobel Peace Prize award has been seen as an Orwellian travesty by other commentators. Thus John Passant in the Sydney Morning Herald: “Obama is a war criminal" (see “Obama is a war criminal, not a peacemaker”: http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/obama-is-a-war-crimin... ).

Outstanding anti-racist Jewish American writer Stephen Lendman has stated: “"The Nobel Committee's tradition is long and inglorious, but for the well-informed no surprise. Consider its past honorees:Henry Kissinger; Shimon Peres; Yitzhak Rabin; Menachem Begin; FW de Klerk; Al Gore ..." (see “October Surprise: Peace Prize to a war criminal”: http://www.countercurrents.org/lendman121009.htm ).

Eminent conservative US economist, editor and writer Dr Paul Craig Roberts (Father of Reaganomics) has declared “It took 25 years longer than George Orwell thought for the slogans of 1984 to become reality. "War is Peace," "Freedom is Slavery," "Ignorance is Strength." I would add, "Lie is Truth"" (see “Warmonger wins peace prize": : http://www.countercurrents.org/roberts101009.htm ).

3 other pro-war US presidents have been awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, namely Theodor Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson and Jimmy Carter (see: http://mwcnews.net/content/view/33768/42/ ).

Ari Rusila
18 October 2009 at 05:41

Some “new” information pieces ("confidential IAEA report/Iran has already bomb, tests of modern missiles, secret Qom nuclear facility, Ahmadinejad still in power, the extent of the Iranian program with military dimension and the role of Russian and Pakistan experts ) underlined the growing urgency of action and are indicating that the Americans and Israelis are preparing the public for war.

(More about these developments in my article "Iran's nuclear programme at the crossroads - http://arirusila.wordpress.com/2009/10/16/irans-nuclear-prog...)

However the new information can serve also efforts for peaceful solution. The purpose of PM Netanyahu’s secret visit in Russia maybe was to show to Russia and Iran that USA and Israel are updated about Iran’s situation and they are considering to use fast military option against Iran ’s nuclear facilities. So stakes went higher with thread of escalation an international conflict far more behind only bombing Iran's facilities.

Nobel peace prize won by U.S. President Obama can too have real peace building effect – bombing Iran before Nobel ceremony would give bad image. On the other hand situation gives him the opportunity to move one step further with his initiatives. Indeed last negotiations about Iran’s nuclear programme showed some progress as well direct USA/Iran dialogue for long time.

Iran finally may be ready to make a deal. Iran’s leadership may have achieved much of what it set out to accomplish when it stepped up its clandestine nuclear program in 1999.

andresconvers
19 October 2009 at 01:52

Mr. Pilger,

I do agree with most of your article, given that I live in Bogota and know the affair first-hand. It is somewhat outrageous that Obama found a way to infiltrate the Colombian military in ways that differ from mere training or financing. Yet, I must say I do disagree with the epithet you availed yourself of in describing Venezuela: I doubt that democracy and independence is the proper way to describe a sort-of totalitarian regime with no freedom of press (you can check any Latin American newspaper outside of Chavez's sphere of influence for information on the more than 36 radio-stations he's shut down because they are against his policies, or the television networks he's expropriated). I think it irresponsible to celebrate an ignorant, nepotist (his father rules over the state of Barinas and plus owns a big chunk of it, not to mention his brother) smug, war-mongering demagogue (he incessantly talks about bombing Colombia and leading a war-of-sorts against it long before Obama decided to get involved) as is Chavez. He actually celebrates the FARC guerilla movement, which, despite your political affiliations - left, right, center, it doesn't make a difference - has massacred large number of innocent peasants here in Colombia and holds a significant number of hostages in inhuman conditions (there are videos of this, it's not made up).

Is there democracy under an oppressive regime that abolishes certain civil liberties? (which would mean that the US is not currently a democracy either) Is it justified that he promotes a narco-trafficking organization with a record of abolishing human rights as bad as the Colombian military's just because it considers itself socialist? (I'm including this so you don't think I'm in favor of the current Colombian regime, which I'm not). Do you think a people under an undemocratic regime to be independent and democratic in its ways if it has utilized democratic processes to abolish some of its civil liberties?

Yleinenmies
19 October 2009 at 10:39

This is always the problem with the likes of Mr.Pilger. Even though he is an acclaimed journalist, he likes to paint the world in pure black and white. Reality is not so, but it helps to gain popularity, important for any journalist.

The Chavez regime is not democratic, even though it might have been that when it came to power.

It is ridiculous and cheap to imply that the American president would be directly deciding everything, like the crowd-control weaponry used at the G20 meeting he was "hosting". He is not an emperor and cannot decide every detail byhimself, even if he wanted to.

It is completely another story, that the use of such weapons is appalling.

I'm really hoping for the journalists to pick up some scientific attitude. But as I said, complexity and non-scandalism doesn't sell.

Duckham
22 October 2009 at 02:58

I thought I was condemning American Presidents unfairly by muttering to myself, 'They are all the same, they are all the bloody same,' but seems maybe I am right after all and whatever the packaging they can do nothing else but put the national interest above all else and therefore react eventually in much the same fashion as one another.

tomK
19 November 2009 at 04:40

Brilliant article as usual. John Pilger's consistency in opposing imperialism regardless of the external image it drapes itself in is a breath of fresh air and a lesson to much of what likes to think of itself as the progressive media. It is heartwarming to know that in these troubling and insane days we are going through there are people who can be relied on to stand up for truth and justice.

If I may, I'd like to draw your attention to one of the beloved president's latest demonstrations of utter spinelessness and the "respected" media's lockstep endorsement of it:

"Obama administration to seek death penalty for Khalid Sheikh Mohammed – “self-confessed mastermind of September 11th attacks” waterboarded 183 times in one month alone. Other defendants to face trial in secret – and potential execution – by military commission."

http://freedomofinformation.wordpress.com/2009/11/18/khalid-...

Post your comment

Please note: you will need to login or register before you can comment on the website

About the writer

John Pilger

John Pilger, renowned investigative journalist and documentary film-maker, is one of only two to have twice won British journalism's top award; his documentaries have won academy awards in both the UK and the US. In a New Statesman survey of the 50 heroes of our time, Pilger came fourth behind Aung San Suu Kyi and Nelson Mandela. "John Pilger," wrote Harold Pinter, "unearths, with steely attention facts, the filthy truth. I salute him."

Read More

Vote!

Will Baroness Ashton be an effective EU foreign minister?

Suggest a question

View comments

© New Statesman 1913 – 2009

Tracker