Can Israel be deflected from its war path?
The real danger of Binyamin Netanyahu's irrational arguments for military action in Iran.
By Yo Zushi Published 10 March 2012 10:20
Tensions over Iran rumble on. Following Binyamin Netanyahu's speech on Monday to the lobby group Aipac, in which he declared that "a nuclear-armed Iran must be stopped", the Israeli prime minister has reiterated his belief that negotiations with Tehran would serve only to "deceive" or "bamboozle" the west.
But this time round, he came up with a curious suggestion. "The only way you get a result is if you got them to agree to freeze their enrichment, take out all the enriched uranium that they have enriched, take it out of Iran, the stuff that can make bombs," he said. "If they want to make medical isotopes, you can give them back -- uranium that can serve that purpose, a peaceful purpose."
It's curious because not so long ago, a similar plan was proposed by Turkey and Brazil. In 2010, Turkey offered to receive a substantial shipment of uranium from Iran, to be exchanged for nuclear rods that can be used in scientific research but cannot be processed to make weapons. Under the terms of the agreement, Iran would not stop its enrichment programme but would be left with too little uranium to develop a bomb. An Israeli official quickly dismissed the plan at the time as a "trick"; Netanyahu announced soon afterwards that it was "a bogus suggestion . . . This is transparently an Iranian act of deception that is meant to divert international opinion."
Norman Lamont writes in more depth about the deal and the Iranian question at large in a recent review of Trita Parsi's book A Single Roll of the Dice, so I won't go further than to ask: is there anything that Iran can do to placate the increasingly war-hungry Israel? Netanyahu's blinkered enthusiasm for military action sits oddly with recent political history -- he seems to have forgotten the Brazil-Turkey episode altogether.
This kind of inconsistency is nothing new from Israel. And it's the kind of double-think that made it possible for Shaul Chorev, head of Israel's atomic energy commission, to assert before the 55th general conference of the IAEA in September 2011: "The essential preconditions for the establishment of the Middle East as a mutually verifiable zone, free of weapons of mass destruction and delivery systems, are comprehensive and durable regional peace and full compliance by all regional states, with their arms control and non-proliferation obligations." (An odd sentiment from a spokesman for a country that refused to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and almost certainly possesses a secret atomic arsenal.)
Chorev's apparent enthusiasm for conducting "direct negotiations" to bring about such a "mutually verifiable zone" was undercut by Netanyahu's insistence at the Aipac meeting that time was running out for diplomacy with Iran. The Israeli prime minister compared the supposed inaction of the US and its western allies to the years preceding the Holocaust and declared, with his characteristic flair for drama: "I will never let my people live in the shadow of annihilation."
Iran's domestic policy -- like Iraq's under Saddam Hussein, like Syria's under al-Assad, like Libya's under Gaddafi -- is easy to criticise. And it is rightly criticised: the country's record on women's and gay rights, as well as its suppression of dissent, is no trifling matter. Furthermore, Israel's concern for its safety may be genuine. In his IAEA speech, Chorev observed: "Regimes that brutally oppress their own citizens and do not hesitate to plunge into bloodshed have no hesitation when it comes to non-compliance with their legally binding obligations under international law."
Yet this is equally true of Israel, which negotiates its hypocrisy regarding its treatment of Palestinians and its flouting of countless UN resolutions through a strategy of deflection and denial. Iran has never invaded another country; no substantial new evidence has emerged in years relating to its alleged plans to develop weapons of mass destruction. Israel, on the other hand, has launched widely condemned assaults on Lebanon and Gaza, habitually defies international calls to cease its settlement activity and maintains a position of ambiguity regarding its status as the Middle East's only nuclear power. Its polarised assumption that the threat lies on one side alone and not the other is a hinderance to peace.
The real danger of Netanyahu's bellicose agenda lies in its potential to trigger an unmanageable situation in the region -- a situation that will surely be as bloody as it will be unnecessary. If the irrationality of his argument for war is reflected in his conduct of one, the region can expect only more misery.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















293 comments
Israel is changing into a militaristic and increasingly intolerant religious state, where the number of religious extremists is growing all the time. I dread to think what they might do with Israel's nuclear arsenal one day. The right want the Israelis to feel afraid so they can step forward and protect them, which is the key to political power, control of the state, and all that goes with it. http://www.carshq.org/
JJ - Seeing things now? Stick to connecting dots with your crayons.
willoyen: Stop deluding yourself. It was only a few weeks ago the president of Iran once again said that Israel should be eradicated off the face of the Earth. As you may recall, it was in 2005 when he [Mahmoud Ahmadinejad] said before that Israel -- he would use a nuclear weapon to wipe Israel off the face of the Earth.” So in your twisted world: that's not a treat?
@julia harris: you are fucking mental :)
@Writeon
I certainly think we do not hear enough dissenting voices within Israel. We are given the impression that Israeli society speaks with one voice. I for one am not convinced that Bibi speaks for all Israelis. ( not to mention the Zionist lobby on this comments page who are doing a very good hatchet job for Israel which rather than drawing people to the cause, invokes aversion.
The article cited above is relevant too because it links the question of attacking Iran to the Palestine question. I have said all along that I believe the question of Palestine cannot be separated from the question of Iran. If the Israeli attack commenced, that act of war would set back the peace process for many decades to come. That is a depressing thought!!!
There is also the broader question to consider of what Iran would do if it were attacked by Israel. Would Iran retaliate? WHat would be the best and worst case scenarios. Could Israel and Iran sustain the fallout?
Arminius, do you deny you wrote this: '...something Philip would prefer to keep hidden much like the photographs of him [Philip] in Hitler Youth uniform'
The facts about Al-Husseini are from Beny Morris who quotes Philip Mattar, 'The Mufti of Jerusalem: Al-Haj Amin al-Husayni and the Palestinian National Movement.
Incidentally, Al-Husseini's calls to exterminate the Jews an his pro-Hitler policies shock even Mattar, his sympathetic biographer! The latter wrote that AL-Husseini cooperated with the most barbaric regime in modern times, the Nazis.
And Iran with its Holocaust denial, its calls for Israel to be exterminated. Well, connect the dots.
History teachers the Jew no one will defend them, but themselves. I honestly believe nuclear war in the Middle East is unavoidable why because unlike the political conflict between East and West, you have in this conflict a potent mix of religious fanaticism and rabid anti-Semitism. Terrifyingly this conflict will not end until the winds finally dissipated the mushroom clouds.
JJ - When I lived in Germany serving my country I supported Arminia Bielefeld. Incidently, Arminius was from the Cherusci tribe not the Teutones, bozo.
Israel's PR is working overtime. Claims its anti-rocket system is near perfect - intercepting 2 out of every six rockers fired from Gaza.
Methinks this shield will have to improve quite considerably.
Called a truce have we? Egypt comes to the rescue yet again.
Let's see how soon the Israeli heavens open to strike down another Palestinian?
Samson Agonistics
Arminius - save your breath to cool your soup. What on earth is the point of these rambles which have nothing to do with this blog?
@ Arminus
Re. comments by JJ et al. They seem to take New Statesman readers for fools.
@Armnius: With your ill-informed claptrap about Israel it was no revelation to see that you've never been 'East of Cyprus'. Travel broadens the mind, even the diseased one, so do travel to Israel old chap. You will also be able to see the place where Prince Philip's mother's remains are interned.
You know Prince Philip, the one you allege was photographed in Hitler youth uniform. Chortle!
And, Arminius, your antisemitism here is not just to wind people up but is sincere.
@Mariella
Thes disgusting 'zhids' fucking Zionist colonialst imperialist scum have once again hijacked your username at 18.03, 18.46, 20.53, 20.58, 21.03 and 21.38 to make you appear as some sort of fanatical lunatic!!!!
I hope all reasonable readers will appreciate that some Jew-dog wrote this crap.
I hope now people appreciate why I said earlier that that the only tragedy about the so-called 'holocausr' was that it didn't complete the job.
If Mariella wants to state the bleedin' obvious she can't do better than say that Bibi does not represent all Israelis. Once again and as in another thread Mariella is so caught up in her own rhetoric that she finally comes full circle and accepts that Israel is a democracy.
Mariella also says that the Zionists' 'hatchet job' is not helping the Zionist cause, rather the opposite ie 'invoking aversion'.
'The lady doth protest too much'! Why mention it if you think so? Didn't they ever teach you 'show don't tell'?
(She is a lady even though she uses OMG! and shouty capital letters. And it was very unkind of me to compare her to Goebbells. She is unique.)
Just have a listen to what this charming member of the Moslem Brotherhood has - its all love and peaceful co-existence!!!!
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6138.htm
'Arminius' - 'Incidently, Arminius was from the Cherusci tribe not the Teutones, bozo.'
Funny that the Goethe Institute (a German organisation) calls Arminius Teuton. I knew he was from the Cherusci tribe.
I like the way you served in the BAOR but yet believe that Churchill should have gone with the Whermacht over the Soviets. When were you radicalised?
hi everyone and especially the mistress of my heart, the one and only Julia! Sadly, she makes the mistake of thinking that opposition to bombing Iran equals support for Islamist fundamentalists and all the koran/sharia wackiness that they come up with.
Actually, its much simpler than that. First, one should never take angry-mouthed politicians at their word, nor should one modify one's military posture in response (NB there is a difference between military readiness and posture, look it up). Second, I have no desire to see more innocent muslims die from Western bombs and missiles, nor to see reports of infants and children reduced to mangled corpses. Governments should base their judgement of other nations on their records of real actions rather than what comes out of politicians' mouths.
And I would caution against pointing out the Hezbollah/Hamas connections, because if we go down that road we can take a long hard look at US/Israeli involvement in subversive activities in other sovreign nations. Couldn't we?
And....cue Julia Harris!
JJ - "something Philip would prefer to keep hidden" doesn't mean they are hidden. Verstanden?
I don't care where your Al-Husseini "facts" come from, they are wrong. SS Hauptamt recruited the Handschar Division and it fought exclusively in Jugoslavia as a Division. The unit only fought against the Russians as a Kampfgruppe in Hungary when most of the Bosnians had been released from service or had deserted. Even as a Division in Bosnia it was not exclusively Muslim (or even Bosnian) since it included Germans, Austrians, Croats and Kosovar Albanians in its ranks.
Stick to connecting dots with your crayons.
@uncle sam
The article above is, actually, not by that Israeli Jew, but, rather, a comment on his research. In any case, it hardly says that Palestinian Arabs are "more Jewish" than Jews coming from Europe, but that Jews and Palestinian Arabs are "blood brothers". The latter is hardly surprising, because it is known that both groups belong to the Semitic race, etc. However, as one of the responders to the article indicates, whatever the genetic relationship was thousands of years ago, by now they represent vastly different cultures. Therefore, the idea of "One Palestine" is absurd, and both groups need their own self-rule. Let us hope that they will, finally, be able to stop their hostilities and live as good neighbors. In order for this to be accomplished, Palestinian Arabs have to stop supporting Hamas and engaging in any forms of terrorist activity against Israel
The doublespeak and hypocrisy displayed by Israel is breathtaking. Under the Shah as documented in the book Oil of Kings Israel was providing Nuclear technology assistance to Iran. Installed as a western puppet supplying nuclear assistance to Iran was never considered to be a problem.
Fast forward 20 years or more and now when the face or government does not fit, Israel now says Iran is a danger!!!
Wow! It's almost as if the next war has broken out already looking at many of the comments here.
I've always been proud of my Austrian Jewish ancestors, who actually were bankers going back around three centuries, until, as totally assimilated children of the central european enlightenment, they, through marriage, merged with an aristocratic military family who where "hard up" in the beginning of the 19th century.
Some of what passes for "history" in the comments here is so primative, biased, and partisan that it's embarassing to read, and one can't do it with a straight face.
And the "facts" stuff is little better. All this facts, facts, facts; historical "facts" are not static, but dynamic and continually open to analysis and interpretation. In this sense historical "Truth" doesn't really exist, but is always evolving, as we evolve and our understanding improves, or changes.
What one musn't do, is mistake or confuse, tribal legends about a mythical past, with real history, in the sense of the process of uncovering and analysing the knowledge we have about the past, as far as we know, at this point in time.
Reducing hisorical complexity, to trite slogans which remind one of grafetti, is similar to propaganda, and in the case of many of the absurd comments here, too numerous to mention, serves the same purpose; to justify and legitimise conflict, violence, conquest, and war.
As someone with a Jewish background, with friends in Israel, who I care about, I find many of the comments here, disturbing and close to unhinged.
I think the ultra-nationalist right in Israel likes to see the conflict continue with the Palestinians because this is the "threat" they require to justify their political existance. For them "peace" would be a horror and a threat to the war-party's position at the heart of Israeli politics. For the nationalists war means power inside Israel, and power means access to the financial benefits that power brings with it, corruption in other words.
It's clear that Israel is not going to attack Iran now and in an election year. Even the head of Mossad Dagan has once again said that there is no need to attack.
JJ - "believe that Churchill should have gone with the Whermacht over the Soviets" - It was Churchill who insisted that the British Army store 2 million German weapons after 8th May 1945 as he thought the former Wehrmacht might have to be reemployed quickly against the Communists. As it was some of them did enter British service under arms in the MSO.
Arminius was not a Teuton but it is not the first time you have been caught posting BS.
@Mariella at 17.04
Richard kemp is' much in demand at jewish organisations and synagogues.' golly how terrible what an absolute scumbag. No doubt if the war hero col.kemp was popular in some scumbag mosque that glorifies honour killing, stoning women to death and hanging Gays from cranes in public squares - he'd be your absolute hero!
Just how many women and gays and blacks have you butchered or incited their butchery Mariella (aka Mehdi 'non-Moslems live like animals' Hasan )
@ KR, I'm sure you'll be disappointed to here that Israel has endured some 100 rockets today, and the IDF targeted the rocket launchers and their leaders.
Thanks to Challah Hu Akbar, we see that every single person killed by the IDF since Friday was a terrorist:
Popular Resistance Committees:
Islamic Jihad terrorists killed
Ahmed Hanani
Zuhir al-Qaisi
Mahdi Abu Shawish
Mansour Kamal Abu Nuseira
Hussein Barham Al-Breim
Ahmed Deeb Salem
Islamic Jihad:
Fayiq Saad
Muatasim Hajjaj
Ahmad Hajjaj
Shadi Sayqali
Ubeid Gharabli
Muhammad Maghari
Hazim Qureiqi
Muhammad al-Ghamry
Muhammad Hararah
Mahmoud Najim
Even more impressive, many of these were killed in urban areas.
This is the most difficult kind of fighting, and the IDF has proven to be better than any army in the world at targeting terrorists from the air.
@ KR - sorry no media opportunity for you.
@ Cobblers, going out now, put you straight later.
@ Peter - well said, unanswerable.
Arminius, why do you downplay Al-Husseini's genocidal alliance with Hitler and his correspondence with Eastern European countries not to save the Jews?
Writeon bangs on about his/her Jewish heritage in an attempt to gain instant validity for his/her views. The fact that he/she needs to mention it twice is even overkill.
And for the record, I am against an attack on Iran now and so are most Israelis, I believe.
"Is anyone who opposes mass murder and ethnic cleansing a 'racist' Mariella?"
sorry to jump in, but on these threads such opposition is attributed not to racists per se but uniquely to Islamofascists...funny old world eh?
Palestine must be free of all Jewish subhuman scum just like Article 7 of the Hamas Charter states. In fact Article 7 call for these subhuman non-Moslems to be killed. Too good for these for animals.
The Goethe Institute calls him a Teuton.
Anyway, who bloody cares. Your name is Arminius. Fine. End of. Bored. (OMG, I've turned into Mariella).
I believe Zushi is absolutely right in his assertion that the question of Iran's nuclear weapons cannot be separated from broader regional Middle East issues. We cannot discuss Iran without discussing the Israel/Palestine conflict. The two are inextricably linked. Whether we like it or not the failure to resolve the Palestine question is a major running sore. It seems to me that past and current Israeli governments have no interest in reaching an accommodation with the Palestinians. As long as Israel is top dog military and has the ear and support of the US, it will continue to dictate the terms of the debate. Dictating the agenda and giving nothing in return is what Israel has done all along. Clearly current and past Israeli political leaderships thinks this hard-line position yields results, because in the hard light of day despite numerous peace discussions over decades have made the plight of the Palestinians worse, not better.
"Jackass/Arminius
12 March 2012 at 21:50"
gosh, a new low. haven't seen anyone disrespecting the Holocaust like that for quite a while. some things are just way out of bounds for petty point scoring on worthless blogs. and the Holocaust is 'out of bounds' period.
or is it just me who thinks like that?
@ Alexander
Your first point about establishing the origins of the Muslim link with Jerusalem are irrelvant. It is clear you want to fashin that debate according to your own trenchant views on Israel. Hiding behind obscure alleged information and presetning them as facts is a ploy often used whne the argument is lost. Face it you cannot accept the fact that the Arab INDIGENUOUS COMMUNITY IN THE AREA OF PALESTINE HAVE AN UNBROKEN LINK WITH THE LAND PRIOR TO JEWISH SETTLEMENT.
The other books, authors, articles that you cite provide a selective and one dimensional view of the Palestine question. Doing a quick search on the authors you mention show that all of them have at their core a pro Zionist agenda
Eric H CLine is an active field archaeologist with 28 seasons of excavation and survey experience in Israel,including eight seasons at the site of Megiddo (biblical Armageddon) in Israel, where he is Associate Director (USA). He is also Co-Director of the renewed excavations at Tel Kabri, Israel
Ref William ALbright. Please note he was the only non Jew to be given the
award The Worthy One of Jerusalem.
It ic clear to me as it will be to all other fair minded readers of this comment page that you are selecting authors who have their own CHristian Zionist agenda. People can and will see through this. As for you reference to Khalidi a Palestinian academic you have deliberately ommitted to mention the key point in his book that Arabs predated Jewish settlements and are in fact direct descendants of the Canaanites and Jebusites.
In fact when reseraching your quotes I have found that most of your stuff has been directly copied from Middle East Forum a group heavily funded by APIAC. Here is the link for readers to see that Alexander has just copied the article entitled: Palestinians, Jebusites, and Evangelicals by David Wenkel. Middle East Quarterly.Summer 2007.
I will leave the readers to judge what they make of your contributions. That is the trouble with the Israeli lobby, they are running out of myths!!!!!
I think that David Grossman, who is a liberal and rational, though patriotic Zionist; but probably not extreme enough for many people here; makes many intersting points.
Attacking Iran is full of danger for Israel and Israel's longterm interests as a liberal democracy.
Destroying any real chance of a "peace process" for decades, does though serve many useful purposes. It would consolidate the militaristic nationalistic right's central position in Israeli politics for a long time.
Israel would be even more isolated and the siege paranoia plays into the hands of the right.
Under cover of an eternal conflict the expansion of Greater Israel taking over more and more Palestinian land, in a very real attempt to "wipe Palestine off the map" could continue for a few more decades, destroying the possibility, however remote of a two-state solution.
Israel is changing into a militaristic and increasingly intollerant religious state, where the number of religious extremists is growing all the time. I dread to think what they might do with Israel's nuclear arsenal one day.
The right want the Israelis to feel afraid so they can step forward and protect them, which is the key to political power, control of the state, and all that goes with it.
But an aggressive Israel, ruled by an intollerant religious militaristic "cult", a radical perversion of the aspirations of Zionism for narrow political/religious, sectarian ends, will be a disaster for Israel in the long run. And that would be a tragedy for most Israelis.
@Toussant
It is clear to me that you lack the intellect necessary to engage in sensible debate. All I have done in my submissions is to challenge a number of Zionist Myths and falsehoods. The truth is out there is you want to find it: the Israelis have perpetrated a terrible injustice on the Palestine people and until they acknowledge this fact, it is impossible to move forward with this debate. Indeed this non denial tactic is what Israel has used to sustain itself since its creation with : a land without a people to a people without a land being the core philisophy.
In subjugating the Palestinian people, it is entirely consistent that the state of Israel wants to now engage in an unnecessary with Iran. I guess if any state would know what the nuclear capabilities of Iran are, Israel would. Indeed Israel supplied the nuclear knowhow in the first place under the Shah's regime.
JJ - Not addressed to you thus f all to do with you. I could ask what your pointless guff has to do with the price of cheese but I couldn't really give a monkey's chuff. Stick to getting ready for the Shabbat.
I would just like to remind the readers that it was in fact Israel that created HAMAS in order to undermine the PLO. When HAMAS refused to tow the Israel line, it was then it felt the full force of Israeli aggression.
JJ - Al-Husseini was a mere pawn to Hitler and certainly not an "ally". To the SS he was as much an Untermensch as the Jews of the Lehi who also sought an alliance with the Nazis.
Your information regarding the Bosnians in the SS was wholly inaccurate and if you were merely quoting a source then you should seek more accurate sources rather than those which suit your prejudices.
JJ - "Anyway, who bloody cares. Your name is Arminius. Fine. End of. Bored". You are the one who brought it up in the first place with your clumsy attempt at a smear. How easily you become bored when exposed as a bullshiter.
The Zionist scum on this site trot out the same old lies, myths and half-truths to justify their own prejudices and to excuse their blood-thirsty desire for war with Iran. War will only bring certain disaster both political and economic and that is why the Western powers should abandon any notion of attacking Iran militarily for the "benefit" of Israel. If Israel feels threatened by the prospect of a nuclear Iran then it should act on its own, something it will not do since it will be too costly to them with no guarentee of "success". Far better to dupe the gullable Goyim into doing the fighting and dying for them. Alternatively, Israel could try diplomacy by offering to give up the nuclear weapons it possesses in return for concessions from Iran. Given that Israel is the most heavily armed nation in the Middle East and is backed by the most militarily powerful nation on earth, sacrificing some nuclear weapons should not compromise its security too much. An Israel without or with fewer nuclear weapons will make the World a safer place since some of it nuclear arsenal is aimed at targets in Europe (including Rome).
Chomsky, who is a Jew, and in my opinion embodies many of the best aspects of Jewish intellectual culture, has a radically different perspective on the coming war with Iran.
http://www.alternet.org/world/154540/chomsky%3A_are_we_about_to_get_embr...
JJ - If travel broadens the mind then you cannot have strayed far from your village of inbred morons. I have been all over Europe and to many other points "west of Cyprus" and have never felt the desire to travel to anywhere in the Midle East, least of Israel. The last relation of mine to visit that area was shot at by Jewish extremists and several of his friends and comrades were murdered by these same vicious scum. This was perticularly gauling for him since he had been in a recce unit that was close to Bergen-Belsen when it was liberated and had previously been very sympathetic to the idea of a Jewish homeland. Contact with the Irgun and Lehi provided him with a sharp reality check.
If you search through the back catalogue of Stern magazine from 1949 you will find a photo of Prince Philip in Hitler Youth uniform at camp with some of his German relations (Philip went to school in Germany before going to Gordonstoun).
In the book "The Royal and the Reich" by Jonathan Petropoulis you will see a photograph of Prince Philip at the funeral in Darmstadt of his older sister alongside his other relations who were members of the SS. When this book was published Philip confessed that he found Hitler's attempts to restore Germany's power and prestige 'attractive' and admitted they he had 'inhibitions about the Jews'.
Surely this is enough evidence for a nutbar like you to label the Queen's consort an "anti-semite" and fascist?
Mr. Zushi's article is plainly absurd. The old and already more than tiring, by now, attempt to tie the Iranian nucleaer problem to the Palestinian issue with which it has nothing to do whatsoever immediately shows that Mr. Zushi's agenda (alas, too popular these days) is to cast Israel, the only benevolent and democratic country in the Middle East, as the villain. If Israel does have nuclear weapons, as Mr. Zushi says, of what other country in the Middle East could it be said that, having it for so long and in the quantities alleged, it would never have used it or threatened it against its neighbors? Also, as has been said many times, we judge the ability of a country to have nuclear weapons as to the way it treats its own citizens. No other Middle East country comes even close to Israel in this regard. Also, Mr. Zushi's whitewashing of Iranian nasty international behavior is bewildering: one does not have to go very far to find evidence of its subservive behavior and using its puppets, such as Hezbollah, to terrorize others. Mr. Zushi's blindness on this is truly amazing!
The vicious anti-Israel campaign should stop at once!
The bottom line is that the Left and the Islamist try to Demonize Israel at every opportunity. They do this to weaken anything and everything that affects it. No other country has so much attention heaped on by people who have never lived or visited the region and/or know little about the conflict.
I could not disagree more with Alexander's comments. I see nothing viscious or inflamatory in what Zushi has said. The Palestine question has everything to do with lack of settlement of the Palestine Question. Indeed Israel is already terrorising some 5 million Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza and now wants to embark on another aggression escapade in Iran. Being on the receiving end of such bellicose and belligerent statements coming from Israel, who could blame the Iranians for going down the nuclear route. As signatories to the IAEI treaties Iran is perfectly entitled to develop civilian nuclear energy programmes; though it seems that Israel wants to put a stop to this as well. If Israel wants to be treated with respect by its neighbours in the region, then it needs to start behaving like a state which can be admired for its human rights record and upholding the principles of justice.
It seems to me that the best way to solve the nuclear standoff between Iran and Israel is to declare the Middle East region a nuclear ree weapons zone. I doubt whether Israel would acede to this request.
Can Israel be deflected from its war path? No.It is a country created by, not just violence, but terrorism. It will continue use to terrorism against the local population who have 'the nerve' not to surrender untill Palestine is wiped off the map.
Dear Mariella:
No, I was not away because I was looking for some other materials. It is just that, as I said before, unlike you who, apparently, has a lot of time on her hands to write numerous and voluminous epistles, I don't, and I had at that time better things to do than to try to argue with people who call black white and white black and have no idea what gray even is. I will refrain from any further comments except that to say that the kind of rhetoric used by the other side has descended to the level below contemptible, as have their arguments. Therefore, I do not wish to participate actively in this farce of a debate; however, I will read the continuation of debate in order to broaden my horizons as to the extent how blind, narrow-minded, and fanatical some people can be. Of course, we all know about the odious tyrants and dictators who are now part of history, but it was refreshing to find out that they are also very much among us.
Adieu!
Israel Palestinian Conflict: The Truth About the West Bank
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uq6tDmLNPjU&feature=related