Welcome to the New Statesman website. Please sign in or register to participate in the conversation.

The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Does Ed Miliband practise what he preaches?

The Labour leader is struggling to throw off the perception that he is a Westminster insider.

How seriously does Ed Miliband take grassroots politics? A leaked email from a longstanding member of his own constituency raises questions about the Labour leader's commitment to the people he serves in Doncaster, echoing new concerns from senior figures in his parliamentary team.

The email, sent from the member to a Labour blogger, says:

I must comment and state that Ed Miliband on the public stage is not the Ed Miliband that is seen in and around the community of Doncaster . . . From knowledge, local knowledge (and) experience Ed should practise what he preaches in his local community when he decides to appear. He is not very popular at this time amongst supporters and Labour party members in Doncaster.

The leak comes as the newly appointed shadow minister for the cabinet office, Jon Trickett, told me that shadow ministers -- including himself -- were in danger of becoming "out of touch" as they moved up the party hierarchy. In one of his first interviews since taking up his position, Trickett raises concerns that the problem is widespread:

[Leading politicians] can be preoccupied with strategic decisions about the ends of the universe. These decisions might well affect the lives of millions, but it remains essential to connect with people by having lots of personal contact with local communities.

From my own experience, I know that it is very easy to become remote. I like to pretend to myself that I still live most of my time in Yorkshire but it can be a form of self deceit when in fact you spend a large part of the week in London.

Everyone knows that a party leader is busy. But comments like these will sting Miliband who has repeatedly called for the rejuvenation of the party beyond Westminster, as evidenced by the recent Refounding Labour consultation.

The Labour leader has also been keen to present himself as someone who will take on elites and "vested interests", but has been struggling to throw off the public's perception of him as a Westminster insider.

It also comes just days after the newly appointed shadow education minister Stephen Twigg made a spontaneous U-turn and embraced the controversial free schools policy which -- as Mark Ferguson on LabourList pointed out -- seemed to undermine new commitments to democraticise the party and give more say to the grassroots.

The Doncaster constituent -- who has just left the leader's constituency with the recent boundary changes -- asked not to be named because it might damage their party career. The constituent was keen to stress that they could not speak for all members, but that there was an "arrogance and complacency" among Miliband's constituency staff and described Refounding Labour as a "farce":

There is little space for intellectual debate at local level unless of course you reside in London. Mr Miliband cannot be serious in moving Labour forward in attempting to create a better society by choosing a reinvigorated shadow cabinet that have no understanding or appeal to those that they represent....This is contrary to his speech. This is contrary to the Refounding Labour debate.

The perception that Ed Milband needs to do more in his own back yard was echoed by a senior member of the parliamentary Labour party, who said the leader needed to "do a lot more" in the area. The fact that Doncaster has also elected an English Democrat mayor is still seen as a sign of discontent with Labour in the region. Yes Miliband has other important issues to deal with, but if you can't connect with your own constituency, how can you connect with the rest of the country?

But Mary Wimbury, one of Miliband's organisers in the run up to the general election, said that the leader had been devoted to the constituency, and that it was "difficult to drag him away" from talking to voters on the doorstep. She added that members understood that as leader, he had a commitment to communities around the country as well as those in Doncaster.

What about Miliband's fellow cabinet members? Many do have a good reputation for constituency work -- Tessa Jowell, Harriet Harman and Chuka Umunna to name a few popular examples -- but they tend to be based in London. Clearly it's easier for MPs who are based in the capital to combine their constituency duties with the Westminster grind. The leader would do well to consider how to support and encourage others to do the same.

Apart from Ed Balls, Liam Byrne is one of the few shadow cabinet members serving outside of London who is still held in high regard in his constituency. When confronted with concerns that other cabinet members might be devote insufficient time to the people who voted for them, Byrne paused before adding diplomatically, "everyone has got different constituencies".

Of course this problem applies to the Tories too, but it's particularly bad for Labour because the party was supposed to offer something better. Ed Miliband might be busy, but you can't talk about rejuvenating movement politics without practicing it. Shadow cabinet members can't encourage members to get involved and participate unless they lead by example. If you want a job in abstract policy, join a think tank.

An MP's first commitment should be serving the people who put them there.

 

Rowenna Davis is a journalist and author of Tangled up in Blue: Blue Labour and the Struggle for Labour's Soul, published by Ruskin Publishing at £8.99.

Tags: Ed Miliband

16 comments

swatantra nandanwar's picture

... Ed also needs to work more closely with Caroline Flint in his neighbouring constituency, and hope that some of the glitter will land on him.

Dave C's picture

"... one of the few shadow cabinet members serving outside of London who is still held in high regard in his constituency."

Evidence please, Rowenna.

Eddy S's picture

we all know ed is a career politician, it is healthy for politicans to have come outside of politics and even the legal world, personally prefer most mp's to have setup there own businesses in the real world and be judged on that before becoming mp's.

Michael's picture

I don't really have much to add. You pretty much hit the nail on the head in my opinion.

RedBek's picture

I do actually wonder how realistic it is for a party leader to keep close constituency links when that constituency is north of Birmingham, bearing in mind their strategic level workload. The other obvious thing is that one might feel more kindly disposed to an oft absent MP if at least his family was based in the constituency as it would show commitment to local services - the family would be using them. But a lot of the time this doesn't happen, probably because people like Ed or David Miliband (or Nick Clegg for that matter) couldn't see a life for themselves outside of the capital. But boy would they learn a lot about real lives if they made that move.

fatman1001's picture

Agree with the last line but come on...HE'S THE LEADER OF THE SECOND LARGEST POLITICAL PARTY in the country.
Don't you think he might have a "lot on his schedule".
Of course it's important for MP's to be loyal to their constituents but lets keep some perspective here!!!

REPAY's picture

Agree with Fatman - lets leave Ed alone on this. Knowing you constituency is one thing, knowing what is the rright thing to is another - focus on that! I would go for substance over style and knowing your constituency is secondary. PS his local party should help on this!

Lady J's picture

This 'source' is the type of person that the Labour party does not want in the party. God knows there are enough 'Traitors' to get rid of just now.

If Jon Trick itt placed his constituents in such high esteem, he should have rejected the position he was offered. You, Trick itt, should practice what you preach.

Take stabbing your 'in post' Leaders in the back or get out of the Labour Party.

Politico's picture

"The difficulty lies not in the new ideas, but in escaping the old ones, which ramify, for those brought up as most of us have been into every corner of our minds...The power of vested interests is vastly exaggerated compared with the gradual encroachment of ideas. Not, indeed immediately...but soon or late, it is ideas not vested interests, which are dangerous for good or evil"
John Maynard Keynes.

New ideas do not come solely from a new generation particularly those who reside at the top of our society. They are experienced and best developed consciously, unconsciously and/or unknowingly by those who are trapped in poverty and who are at the bottom of social mobility ladder and society who face inequality on a daily basis. These ideas are then taken up by those at the top of society who do not experience inequality who are chosen not on hard work and merit but on something else. This is the modern day Labour Party.

"If you are out of sight and out of town you are out of touch"

swatantra nandanwar's picture

Brown was innovative enough to hold his Cabinets in different Cities, thus giving his Southern members a taste of the North who probably hadn't experienced life beyond the Watford Gap. Ed should do the same. This is after all the United Kingdom and no longer London centric.

Union Steve's picture

We need Ed to come of the fence and come up with radical left of centre policies. The rest will fall into place. The traditional Labour supporter needs to know Ed is on their side in Doncaster and in the rest of the UK.

elrob's picture

Jeez, is this one sore constituency member? Join the Q, love.
---------
But what's the use of open goals when you don't have balls.
----------
Ian
er, the politician who did most to defenestrate Murdoch; no balls? FFS. Do people so easily forget what that vile moster did to our party, never mind, the reputations of so many media victims?

And while, Blair and Brown ran to kiss his freakin' Arse; Miliband thrust the dagger. What so many pitiful discontents say of his actions on his brother, too.

No balls? Get a grip!

and Swatantra??? He should stay in Doncaster? Are u for real? He's the leader of the Opposition.
And as for your comparison with Flint; what good did she do at Housing? Fretting that house prices might fall "Don't know how bad it will get".

Let me tell you, Ms Flint. It got bloody awful. Prices trebled under New Labour, people cannot afford a home, there's no social housing, so generation Rent has to consider bringing up kids in six-month tenancies. But She was worried about falling prices.

Everything that was wrong with New Labour. Ed's main worry is whether the party is with him or not. Because if it's stuck in New Labour mode, it will lose, and deserve to lose.

Freeman2's picture

NS gives us the 'inside dope' on what is wrong with 'insider politics'. The paradox doesn't bother you?

swatantra nandanwar's picture

Ed has spent more than half his life in the Westminster Village. No wonder the people of Doncaster are grumpling. They sent him to Parliament to fix their drains and collect their rubbish, not to dabble in political infighting and struttig the world stage.
He needs to set up base in Doncaster and do street politics more and occasionly vist London. He can use social media and his mobile a bit more to kep in touch with events in London and teleconferencing, and hold ShadCab meetings in Doncaster.

Nigel's picture

The best career path for a politician is: real job --> councillor --> backbencher --> frontbencher, and given Ed's path is polar opposite to that I'm not surprised if he can't put theory into practice at a local level. This is likely to be a widespread problem in a PLP dominated by that type of politician and can only be fully addressed by getting back to having MPs with real job histories and local government experience.

I supported Ed strongly for the leadership and I am trying to remain supportive despite being disappointed, and discouraging though it is to hear this about him, frankly I'll be satisfied as long as he doesn't totally screw up and saddle us with another 5 years of this nightmare.

Ian Anstice's picture

Ed Miliband has done almost nothing about the some of the deepest cuts to libraries in the country happening slap bang in his own constituency (http://www.southyorkshiretimes.co.uk/news/local/dearne-area/council_back...). This subject - an open goal immensely popular amongst voters - is being ignored by the Labour leadership.

But what's the use of open goals when you don't have balls?

Post new comment

By submitting this form, you accept the Mollom privacy policy.

Latest tweets