Put out the welcome mat for Mugabe
A former Tory minister suggests the Zimbabwean leader should retire to the UK.
By Sholto Byrnes Published 11 November 2010 12:11
Here's one that's unlikely to become coalition policy: the former Tory chief whip Lord Renton suggested during a debate yesterday that "the best way for us to help and assist the economic recovery of Zimbabwe" might be "to offer President Mugabe a safe, comfortable and well-looked-after home in Britain".
The idea is not as daft as it sounds. It is in his country's interests that Robert Mugabe stand down as soon as possible, but he is no fool. He will want to ensure that if he goes, he does not end up exchanging the comforts of retirement for a prison cell. As I wrote in the Independent last year:
Efforts to bring Mugabe to the International Court of Justice will not increase the likelihood of his voluntarily relinquishing power (and there is no imminent prospect of his leaving in any other way) . . . Refusing to seek legal vengeance for Robert Mugabe's crimes may be hard. But if one day it helps an old dictator become an old ex-dictator, it may prove far sweeter than revenge.
A managed exile with guaranteed immunity is an obvious solution. Previously it was thought likely that Mugabe might seek to retire to east Asia. Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia are all regular destinations for him and his entourage, and have the inestimable advantage of being places where autocratic rule is not regarded as so objectionable.
But Britain, as Lord Renton generously put it, might also be to his tastes. For Mugabe, like various other leaders of post-colonial countries (Idi Amin springs instantly to mind), has long had a love-hate relationship with the former imperial master.
He may have attacked Tony Blair's administration for being a government of "gay gangsters", but another former Tory minister, George Walden, recalls that his attitude towards Britain used to be quite different. Walden was a senior Foreign Office civil servant at the time of the negotiations that led to Zimbabwe's independence; he remembers the Mugabe of that time as a "venomous, stonewall" Maoist. After he came to power, however, "everything about him seemed to change for the better". Walden described the new, improved version in the NS two years ago:
Charm is not a word I associated with Mugabe, yet when Margaret Thatcher gave a dinner in his honour at Downing Street and praised the Marxist terrorist's work for peace and reconciliation (after vowing never to negotiate with terrorists), he received her tribute gracefully, charmed to be there, just as he was to be charmed by his knighthood later. Thereafter he worked with the British to implement the Lancaster House Agreement, including its provisions to pay the colonialists' pensions and refrain from changing the constitution for ten years.
So the UK could be a congenial exile for Mugabe. As for where he would live, why not the Wentworth Estate, where General Pinochet was made to feel so comfortable while the Labour government was wriggling out of having to extradite the Chilean dictator to Spain?
If the courts can't get Mugabe, some might think retirement to an area usually populated by showbiz types such as Russ Abbott, Cliff Richard and Bruce Forsyth would be punishment enough to be getting on with.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists
















37 comments
How little people know about Mugabe. All I read on the subject is an unconditional, venomous hatred for the man.
Growing up in Zimbabwe gave me a different perspective, one not conveyed by BBC reporters reporting under the cover of darkness, whispering absurdly and wearing bullet proof vests.
It is true, in the last 10 years, he has gone quite mad - but to claim he is a dictator is nonsense, that is just what we want to believe. If anything he is constantly trying to defend his position, acting with weakness, in fear of the ambitious, back stabbing & corrupt ministers below him. I would say he is much closer to a cynical, arse-covering British politition than a Sadam.
I realise that part of the hatred comes from his views on homosexuality. Well of course, these are ridiculous, but are quite normal in southern Africa, and quite in keeping with his catholic faith.
Finally, I am not in anyway defending the Mugabe, he has lost all credibility to me and the demise of the nation is largely the fault of his ZANU-PF government. Decades of progress and promise, have been undone. I am simply wondering aloud how he has come to be portrayed the single 'tyranical' cause of Zimbabwe's misfortune.
I suppose the reason is that we only have appetite for a small dose of reporting from each worldwide tragedy. It is much more memorable and convenient to have a single bully to cast our hatred upon than it is to really understand the less dramatic, more tragic truth, which is not so dissimilar form the way our politics works.
of course huffpuff, blame the white men, blame the colonial powers, blame everything on someone else.. cause your to ignorant to take responsibility for yourself
the stuff that is happining in zimbabwe, is zimbabwe's fault not the US or UK.. man
blacks and there blaming, its pathetic
@georgep: Do you really believe that Mugabe is hated primarily due to his stance on homosexuality? What about all the people who've starved to death in Zimbabwe due to his policies? Surely the way he's ruined the country's economy and ruined so many lives is more serious than his bigotry? If he does take up sanctuary here, he should immediately be locked up and put on trial. It's not going to happen though; he'll stay on as leader in Zim until he drops dead.
Maybe it should be left to Zimbabwe to deal with Mugabe. So far they have put up with him.
No one with the zeal of a Muslim martyr has appeared on the scene.
It would have been a solution.
To find excuses for an old dictator seems a bit hypocritical.
To offer him sanctuary is the ultimate idiocy.
I am always baffled by the ideas British politicians come up with.
@ Nhari
If Mugabe is a hero what does a villain look like?
Like mother Theresa if one uses your argument.
@Chris: No, I don't think he is hated primarily for views on homosexuality, I was just trying to address this as it does come up quite often. My real point was that our media has built up a big, easily packagable hate figure, to which all our rage is directed. I am pointing out the trivialisation of the issue - in truth, it is not all about one bad man.
Its not the fault of normal people for having this perception, they are just reacting to what they read in the news. The only reason I know different is I have an alternative perspective.
To be clear, I don't deny that corruption has caused the collapse of the economy and led to thousands starving.
Britain needs to fuck off,Mugabe is a real hero, a zimbabwean who have every right to live anywhere in zim even if he retires.
what the fuck does Britain knows about politics,come to zim we will fry your asses
The white man is not indigenous to Africa. Africa is for Africans. Zimbabwe is for Zimbabweans.
Robert Mugabe.
The black man is not indigenous to
Europe. Europe is for the European.
England is for the English?
True, some land was bought by a few Cabinet Ministers. They bought the land. No minister, to my knowledge acquired land which was meant for resettlement.
Robert Mugabe, lying old bastard.
Nhari
11 November 2010 at 12:53
Britain needs to fuck off,Mugabe is a real hero, a zimbabwean who have every right to live anywhere in zim even if he retires.
what the fuck does Britain knows about politics,come to zim we will fry your asses and he's not joking..
Murder in Zim. A new force emerged from these troubles called the 5 Brigade. They were nicknamed
‘Gukurahundi,’ a Shona expression meaning ‘the first rain that washes away the chaff of the last
harvest before the spring rains.’ The term used to have pleasant connotations, but in the 1980s
it assumed an entirely more disturbing meaning, as the notorious North-Korean trained 5
Brigade murdered thousands of people in the Zimbabwean province of Matabeleland and parts
of the Midlands. The truth is that the international community underestimated how committed a
'Marxist' Mugabe actually was. He believed firmly in a one party system, which is why he invited
ZAPU to join them. When they didn’t, he tried to remove them and their followers. This is why
Gukurahundi has come to be associated with ‘washing away’ the opposition.
On Zimbabwe we in the UK might do well to ask a few simple questions:
1. Why the Zimbabwean fixation by the media? It's, after all, not the only dodgy African regime.
The media hatchet-job on Zimbabwe stands somewhat starkly in contrast with other African regimes. In 2003 Paul Kagame is elected President of Rwanda with over 95% of the vote after, according to the Economist, having arrested two days before the day of the election the entire campaign team of his opponent and paraded them on television duly denouncing their [former] candidate. The use of the media and PR is becoming a key feature of western-backed regimes in Africa - Kagame now has the august services of Tony Blair himself and his McKinsey consultant who tout Kagame as a 'model African leader', whilst Museveni in Uganda has the PR giant Hill & Knowlton, and the thoroughly nasty little dictator in oil-rich Equitorial Guinea, President Obiang, has Cassidy & Associates who have to apply the whitewash in especially thick layers to cover up his atrocious & notorious history of arrest, murder, & torture. The neoliberal revolution begun in the 1980s has blown its chilly wind through the global media industry too with an 80% decline in staffing levels - a goodly many of these journalists have migrated directly into PR companies and even government press offices ensuring more than ever that the information we get is the information we are intended to get.
2. Why do Africans see Zimbabwe so differently to the Europeans? There is a disjuncture here in perception that takes more than a little explaining. Indeed the more rabid the demonisation of Mugabe becomes in the west the more the Africans seem propelled to support Mugabe; even intelligent grown-ups in the west most have their doubts given the dumbness of this comic portrayal of Mugabe. If he is a vote-rigging tyrant why rig the vote so that his opponent gets more votes? Perhaps he should seek advice from Paul Kagame or Hosni Mubarak both of whom secured almost all the votes cast during their 'elections'.
3. Why is the media coverage so obviously one-sided? The reporting on Zimbabwe with its failure to put the other side of the story has become almost embarrassing by any journalistic standards. However much you may disagree with a group or party there is no excuse for failing to report the other viewpoint. I happen to know for a fact that one UK-based academic and supporter of Zanu-PF has been repeatedly submitting articles to The Guardian newspaper since 2002 but without any success. He is not alone. I defy anyone in recent years to point to a credible commentator or pundit getting the Zimbabwean point of view any air time in the UK media. When they are it is usually in the form of a media trap designed to further the official media line through the tactics of lampooning or ridiculing or discrediting. They seem to have forgotten that the primary goal of journalism is to present both sides of the argument and leave it to their audiences once informed to make up their own minds. But in this regard Zimbabwe hardly stands as a unique example.
Charming!
Somewhere alomg the lines Mugabe went off the rails. He may have been a freedom fighter, locked up by the Smith regime for years on end, and have to put up with nagging Odinga Odinga and compromising Sithole, but on achieving power he completely lost it, like many of the other African leaders and democracy didn't amount to a hill of coffee beans.
Someone should put a bullet through that smug bastards face!
The difference between European colonialism in Africa and that of Chinese neo-colonialism is the Europeans needed the African to extract Africa's wealth. China wants Africa's wealth, but don't need the African. Africa is exchanging one colonial master for another, but what does this African Marxist care, he will be dead in a couple of years. It's the Africans that will pay for having so many appalling leaders, such as Sir Robert Mugabe.
the man has totally lost it. infact if he is really a true statesman why can't he step down for anyone in his part. the truth is the idea of him holding onto power sheds more light on his persona and character of a dictator. truely he is
It's easy to bla bla about all the things Mugabe has done to Zimbabwe and what the western media do etc.
But there is one fact that no mentally stable person can argue with...we are all humans, and are all as bad as eachother, whether we come from a rich or poor country and whether we follow a faith or not.
FACT...PERIOD.
"Yank fucks, makes me spew at times."
Not sure what the article has to do with Americans. But hopefully the yanks make ya spew and choke on your own vomit.
" CIA - who's have them?"
Nice syntax. How's the weather in Pyongyang and Beijing at the moment?
"China will no doubt not stand for any yank CIA nonsense, even with their spread atempts of disinformation on China in the western press."
And no doubt the US will not stand for CCP 50 cent disinformation, what with their mindless minions like you attempting spread disinformation abou the US (and the West) on the government-controlled Eastern press.
I think the U.K. should welcome you with open arms President Mugabe ! You can join the thousands of other criminals , terrorists , preachers of hate , fugitives and scum bags that inhabit the island of Britain and we should rejoice in the fact , that , yes the U.K. is tolerant and fair .Bring your cash like the Saudis or anyone for that matter and the Government will make sure a nice pad is set aside for you in Kensington or in a plush area of London . In fact bring your slaves and the rest of your domestic workers and you can treat them like you desire without any interference ! The U.K . is proud to welcome all peoples , the destitute , down trodden and people looking for a fresh start ! So be thankful that a person like you who fits that category and has unblemished past should be able to enter the U.K. and furthermore be welcomed by members of the coalition government , What a lucky boy you are !!!
Errm Swatantra, Idi Amin is dead and has been so for seven years now.
Statements like this are silly, they just boost Mugabe's ego and are the fodder to his anti-Brit speeches.
The intervention strategies of Tony Blair, Bishop Sentamu and Lord Renton may be headline grabbers but all of them are ridiculous suggestions. Britain should just stay out of Zimbabwe's affairs and stop trying to solve the 'Mugabe problem'.
I wonder, if Mugabe had retired in 1996, before any sign of problems ahead arose, do you all believe that the outcome would be significantly different? What about the ever growing frustration of the war veterans, at their 20 year old promise for land redistribution? Would this deeply controversial issue never come to a head? And if it did; what would be the economic effect of the idealogical, pro-farmer perspective of an almost colonial British media, and consequent pressure on Western trade.
Mugabe is an old, weak, corrupt man - yes. But Tyrant, single cause of all that is wrong with Zimbabwe - not really!
Who am I to compete with the influence of the media - I only wish to give a few, more thoughtful people, a few moments consideration -> "perhaps this is, to an extent, a case of demonising by a monopolist-perspective mass media".
All is not always as trivial and bite sized as it seems (and the headline obsessed media would have you believe). The only way to become aware of this is to have an alternative perspective to that spoon fed by the news. This happens to be on issue that I know about, but it has taught me to treat with absolute caution, any inferences made by mass media on complicated issues.
On reflection not bad idea at all.
Lord Renton could rent Mugabe one of the houses on his estate, invite him for dinner at the House of Lords on a regular basis and ensure he gets membership to one of the more exclusive "gentlemans clubs" in London.
Lady Renton could take Mrs Mugabe on shopping trips to London and invite all her friends round for tea to meet Mrs Mugabe and make sure she is invited to one of the Queeen's garden parties !!
.... err How many black Zimbabweans did Mugabe's Korean trained 5th Brigade slaughter ??
The man should be in The Hague waiting trial for crimes against humanity not looking forward to retirement in UK !!
Forget The Hague, Mugabe must face trial in Zimbabwe. Let him be imprisoned in those crappy cells. He can't be tried at The Hague anyway because Zimbabwe is not signatory to the Rome Statutes, therefore outside of the jurisdiction of the ICC. And even if he could be brought to trial be referral of another state (highly impossible anyway) the ICC can only try crimes committed after 1 July 2002 so the 1980s massacre is one for the Zimbabwean courts. If (BIG IF!) it's done right at least people will feel justice is being done, but I doubt it.
Mugabe has always been a Chinese agent, so let him retire there.
Mugabe is a synonym of hyperinflation.
Whorst thing to happen in modern world!
And towards which BoE and FeD are pushing the western wolrd once more just now.
So accepting Mugabe as a citicen of UK,
is not so far fetched afterall?
@huffpuff very interesting, well thought-out points
@Ehtee
1990 that the health system set up there,
Ehtee have you have lived in Zimbabwe like the man said or been outside the M25 loony bin?
In 1990 one doctor equalled thirty thousand people. They had a decent health service because clever whites set one up! Tens of thousands who were slaughtered by North Koreans did not recieve any help!
The only way that Mugabe will leave the scene is if the Great Leveller intervenes. He'll be 85 by the time the next Presidential comes around and will stand again, and knowing Zim democracy will win again. Following the great example set by Banda in Malawi who retained the love and affection of his peoples well into his 90's and was President for life.
If Mugabe ever stepped down from office he knows full well he'd be up before the Int Court and theres no way he could negotiate a pardon. Talk of exile is out of the question.
In a way it was the white farmers that perversely kept im in power. If they had been more acceptive of 'africanisation' of land, we wouldn't have this awful situation. But because they were so entrenched refusing to cooperate towards gradual 'africanisation', disaster.
The best place for him would be Saudi Arabia, long with Idi Amin. The Saudis take a stern view of the gay scene, are autocratic and have masses of money stashed away, so Robert would be quite at home there. One thing is clear, he must not come to the UK, unless he stays at Her Majesty's Pleasure.
The Zimbabweans in the last ten years or so are [yet] another good example of why the US and the UK should be prosecuted for war crimes and would be in a saner world.
"Following the great example set by Banda in Malawi who retained the love and affection of his peoples well into his 90's and was President for life."
Loved by his people? Great example?That is simply not true. Kamuzu Banda proclaimed himself a life president and when he was finally defeated at the polls, he was put on trial soon as he left office and he claimed he had progressive senility and suffered memory loss so could not be tried for the murders he had participated in. (Google Mwanza Trial) Banda was a corrupt dictator, but far, far less brutal than Mugabe.
Post new comment