This is unfair to the poorest teenagers in our country
Axing the Education Maintenance Allowance will prevent thousands of young people from deprived backgrounds from going to university.
By James Mills Published 21 October 2010 14:21
Last week the debate around tuition fees focused on whether it would put people from low-income backgrounds off going to university. Yesterday that choice was taken away from them as the Education Maintenance Allowance (EMA) was axed. When I say axed, that is what was done, in effect: because when you turn to page 42 of the Comprehensive Spending Review green book you see that the saving from "replacing" the EMA is £0.5bn, which also happens to be the entire budget for the scheme.
If you don't know what the EMA was, it was basically a means-tested allowance of between £10 and £30, paid to 16-to-19-year-olds who stayed on in education and who were from deprived backgrounds where household income was below £30,810 per year.
Those receiving the £30 payment made up 80 per cent of all recipients; to able to receive this payment, household income had to be below £20,817 per year. This sum may seem insignificant to some, but in a survey carried out by the National Union of Students in 2008, 65 per cent of participants who were on the highest EMA rate of £30 said that they could not continue to study without the EMA.
But if this still does not convince you to their importance, at least the weight of evidence supporting the EMA far outweighs the arguments of any naysayers. For example, research by the Institute for Fiscal Studies shows attainment at GCSE and A-level by recipients of the EMA has risen by 5 to 7 percentage points since its introduction, and by even more for those living in the most deprived neighbourhoods. In addition, RCU Market Research Services carried out an investigation on the national scheme and published a report called Evaluation of the EMA National Roll-out 2007, which concluded:
The EMA is reducing Neet (those Not in Employment, Education or Training) and also motivating learners to work harder.
Ipsos MORI published a report in 2008 called Evaluation of Extension of Education Maintenance Allowance to Entry-to-Employment and Programme-Led Apprenticeships. This report reached similar conclusions to the RCU research:
The EMA is reducing Neet and also motivating learners to work harder.
But, if one wants to look for an example of why the axe should not fall on the EMA system, one has only to look to Scotland. The SNP administration in Holyrood which administers the EMA for Scotland, has cut the budget for the allowance by 20 per cent and made regressive changes to the scheme's eligibility criteria. These changes lowered the threshold for the £30 payment and axed the £10 and £20 payments in Scotland.
The action has unfortunately led to fears in Scotland that progress made so far will be undone by the SNP administration's policy. At the time of the cut, the NUS claimed that it would lead to 8,000 students dropping out. As youth unemployment in Scotland has risen by 7,000, it is hard to dispute their early prediction.
The £20 and £10 payments may seem a small sum to some, but this maintenance allowance removes some of the barriers to participation in education, and the £10 and £20 brackets are useful in this case, particularly in covering transportation costs.
Figures on the EMA released by the Scottish government just last year showed that the old system developed under the Labour administration was successful. The figures showed that 39,110 college students and school pupils from low-income families were taking up the allowance in 2007-2008, up on levels for 2006-2007.
The figures also showed that the allowance helped school pupils from low-income families stay on in education: 77 per cent of school pupils on the EMA scheme for the full year achieved the attendance rates and learning expectations set out for them, compared with 70 per cent in 2006-2007. The percentage of those on the EMA for a full year and receiving £10 or £20 payments who completed the scheme increased to 82 per cent (the figures for 2006-2007 were 74 per cent for those on £10 payments and 73 per cent for those on £20 payments).
These figures may seem just a list of endless statistics to some, but they represent something quite different to me. Since I started the Save EMA campaign, I have had hundreds of emails and messages from teenagers on the Save EMA website who are very worried about their future.
Take this one from Alex:
Without the EMA I wouldn't be able to go to college and become what I have always dreamed of being.
This is something I can relate to, as I was on the allowance, and I know that attending sixth form depended on those payments. When they were delayed, it meant that I missed college. Luckily that didn't happen too often, and unlike my older sisters and all the generations in my family before me, I was able to straight on to university.
My old sixth form now has half the students on the EMA. It pains me greatly to think that there are many people like myself at my old school who will not have the same opportunity to stay on in education and get the qualifications they need to live a better life. But I will leave you with the words of Alex, another of the many people who have emailed me and written on our website.
For me, his comment sums up what the Comprehensive Spending Review means to people like us:
I need EMA otherwise I will have no education. In other words . . . no future.
James Mills is part of the Save EMA Campaign.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















81 comments
Just to clear this up, students no longer receive extra bonuses on-top of their EMA as that was axed earlier this year.
I am on the last year of a full time BTEC course, and rely on the security EMA gives me. Unlike the stereotype students have been getting in regards to spending money on drugs amongst other things, I spend my money on transport and other commitments such as my phone. A mere £10 a month is spent from EMA on my phone, but none the less I am under a contract so I am unsure about how I am going to cover it when EMA ends. The main thing EMA money gets spent on is transport. I like to go town to meet friends via the train, but that is expensive and my parents wouldn't give me the money for this. The way EMA is billed is wrong. Saying that EMA encourages students to come into college makes students look bad. I would want to continue in education even if there was no student funding, but this still doesn't mean it is possible without it. The reason EMA is so beneficial for myself is that my parents believe that I should get a job if I want money, and they have always stood up to that argument if I am ever to ask for money from them. My full-time course means that the only free time I get is on the weekend, yet my course is completely coursework based so I have to use a lot of my free time working on college work, let alone a job. I hope my comment is heard and the doubtful few realise how important EMA is to young students.
Once again, conservatives showing just how little they care about students from deprived backgrounds. Raising tuision fee's and taking away EMA is a sure-fire way to ensure that many students stop caring for education, and sign on the dole instead!!! My dad recently had a double leg amputation, and we're tight on money in all sectors, whilst at the same time im taking A levels in Travel, Science and Archaeology. How in the blue hell do I manage to cope with no EMA i will have no idea since i refuse to rely on my dad for funding for transport costs, education costs and lunch. Thank you conservatives, thanks for nothing.
For people who say that teenagers who receive the
EMA only spen it on drugs, cigs and alcohol, stop
labelling all teenagers, because not all students
who receive the EMA do that! - I receive EMA, and
I am thankfull for it, even if I didn't get it I
would still continue on in further education, ..
Yes I agree, some students do abuse the EMA they
get like my friend she gets £30 and spends it on
make-up and clothes and other things that will not
benifit her acedemically; and she spends it as soon
as she gets it, I spend my EMA on books for my sociology
course, stationary and art supplies, I use my EMA,
carfully, and only when I need it, the rest I put
into a savings account, to help me use in
university; which I am hoping to get into.
I find it appauling that people (who are obviously from a middle class
Background) feel the urge to say that students who
Receive EMA spend it stupidly, yes some people do
But that is the small majority.
Another thing I disagree in, is that everyone should get EMA
EMA is given to those whose parents can't financially fund
Their children, with books and travel ect. So why should
Students, whise parents can; be given it? When they don't need it.
????
And in response to Will. Do you have any idea about what students actually spend this on. Because my EMA has never gone towards cigarettes, drugs, or alcohol. Oh and wait isn't eating something we HAVE to do to LIVE? So what do you suggest we do. I agree that some people don't deserve EMA and quite rightly so, but for some people we need to relay on this in order for us to continue our education. How can you seriously look at the minority of students and make an assumption from something that isn't completely true. And by the way, if you aim on taking personal attacks, im not a chav, and I hate lazy people who can't be bothered to work for their money, but personally, i think your statement is very steriotypical and wrong.
My daughter is working has a prostitute to send my son to Stowe. My daughter is on her back most nights and it works out well for everybody. Even her clients say she works hard. More people should get up off their arses and onto their backs.
Osborne, Cameron and Clegg do not understand ordinary people.
Their children will automatically go to the best schools and universities, even if they're not bright. It's called privilage.
So even if the poorer children have potential, this coalition insists on putting barriers in their way.
Samuel
22 October 2010 at 01:35
Quire right sweetie tell them, what studnet has ever wasted their money on drink ,drugs, ciggies or girlies.Most of my grant goes on those cheap Penquin classics like Mill on the floss!
I think it is absolutely ridiculous to axe EMA.
I'm a student on EMA and i simply wouldn't be able to go to my 6th form if i didnt have EMA as it pays for my travel and supplies i need for my courses, my mum is too unwell to work as she is disabled and if EMA does get axed then i dread for my brothers chance of attending college or a 6th form. I personally think it is a scheme to benefit the middle and upperclass and it is discrimination against the poor.
I expect that it will become compulsory to stay on in education until age of 18. Probably that's why they kept child benefit for 16+ year olds.
Child Credit is still there for 16-18 yr olds. Perhaps they will increase it to compensate for the loss of EMA. No I thought not!
One final point. It was the Conservatives that re-branded the former Polys as Unis so don't try and pin that one on Labour.
the poeple who have put ema is only for people who want to buy drugs is completley riduculus,how would you feel not having enough money for school to feed yourself each week or enough to buy bus tickets or new clothes because you dont have enough money
. to the people who have said that, do you know everyone on ema, of course you bloody dont,how can you say they all buy drugs with it. in response to will who said that people only spend it on drugs your obviously a complete fucking idiot, i know many people who cant afford to get to collage each day without ema how would you like to be them you ignorant idiots. i think you should start saying thoses things when you actually understand what your talking about. it doeasnt make you attend collage, if people wanated £30 a week that badly they would get a job and get a lot more money from it. clearly the people who have said that are completley brainless idiots who do not understand some of the poorer people in society.
I'm still trying to work out how we ended up with a coalition government... Perhaps a few parents aka voters forgot to vote for LABOUR!
This government will do what the thatcher and all previous cons excuse the pun.. governments have failed to do remind working class stainless steel spoon people, not to forget thier roots vote labour no matter what!
So when does the axe fall on EMA?
Or is that it its gone as of now,its all so vague.
Students who get ema there parents get enough fuckung benifits so make you stingy parents pay for you.. What did you do before you started college!! They fucking paid for you so let them carry on.. Why should working parents still have to pay fir their kids when benifits people get everything for fuck sake!!! Makes me sick honestly.
Truly disgraceful and misguided decision by Osbourne.
An excellent article highlighting the true facts about EMA. My members, and their families rely on EMA and as a result of this crass and reckless decision, we face thousands of young people with the possibility of dropping out of education altogether.
At a time of record numbers of young people not in education, employment or training, I want to know how Michael Gove can look a young person in the eye and tell them he made this decision in their best interests. He will fail miserably. We will be marching on November 10th in protest of cuts to education, and I can guarantee that this Government will face the biggest backlash amongst further education students that they have ever seen.
Shane Chowen
Vice President (FE)
National Union of Students
I do not think that axing EMA will reduce the numbers entering university. All the people I know that have EMA spend the money on food, cigarettes and drugs. Do these sound like the essential ingredients for entry to university? I think not.
Removing EMA is the best place to start clawing back some money, EMA should never have been invented in the first place.
Next, harshen the JSA requirements, get those lazy chavs into work.
and the only reason these people, who get EMA, come to college IS TO GET EMA - so do the people doing the survey not realise that the students are going to be opposed against getting £30 from the state each week for doing sweet FA? It's a joke.
I just want to make this completely clear. I do not recieve EMA and i`m getting angry that there are a bunch of kids at the college i go to that recieve EMA payments and brag about how there getting a plasma TV or an I-phone.
EMA should be given via non-refundable vouchers for school items. Currently other classmates are earning about £100-200 per week off EMA payments.
It really sucks that everyone gets EMA just slouches around getting paid for what they dont even do, while those without work hard and recieve nothing.
I get ema to pay for my education i need this money i cannot turn to my parents and ask for money. I dont see why people get jealous when we get ema you can afford holidays clothes school trips ect we would much rather be in that situation its not fair if i dont get ema i cannot continue with my education i will need to get a job and will not have time for coursework
michael sayers - you are absolutely correct.... Not everyone buys drugs my college is 21 miles away from my house how the fuck do i pay for petrol money to my grandad to get to college and sometimes the train i mean are all you rich people realy that brainlesS??
As soon as a 16 year old leaves school but wants to attend 6th form they are then classed as adults! They have to pay full fares on buses and trains. It costs my daughter £5 a day return just to get to school so that is nearly all of her EMA gone in one go. It is my understanding that all children have to stay on at school until they are 18 soon, so if they are stopping EMA, change the rules and give them free transport.
OMG! what would I do without EMA a gay needs new clothes and EMA pays for them. Also Ill be 18 next year and EMA will pay for my first dildo, WOOP I cant wait.
Heyy babe, Im gay too get in touch maybe we can talk a little and get to know each other if you know what I mean...
;) xxx
Why did Tony Blair make the ridiculous target that he wanted 50% of young people to go to Uni? This led to lots of useless degree courses starting off ( surfing !! ) and too many people going on to university that normally wouldn't have gone. This has back fired big time, as now we can't afford it. I feel really sorry for the bright people coming through school now who will decide not to go because the amount of debt they will be left with is far too high.I can't believe that any government can take this reckless action. Douglas " two brains " Willis or whatever he's called should be renamed " half a brain"! He calls trebling the tuition fees a good deal for students.
i don't know why people think that EMA is just made to make students go to college, i spend all of my ema on the bus's i have to travel and on books because i don't actually live in a rich family who can afford to help me, if i don't get EMA, i might have to walk it to college and it's not fair because the government are ok with getting all the tax to keep themselves when it comes to helping they simply don't care, i don't see what the difference is between them and the labour party, their all after money, to be honest i would prefer margaret thatcher to come back or atleast someone who is honest like her, atleast she allowed us to live the way we want unlike this tories! this year christmas won't be good for anybody i could hnoestly say so.
get out tories!
This is a silly risk- yes, there are teenagers that spend their EMA on drugs, alcohol and cigarettes, and slide through college rather than get a job, but I'd must rather we propped up that lazy minority (that are hardly going to overly achieve in life at a later date), knowing that bright young people with inquisitive minds and academic ambitions can pursue their quest for higher education.
If EMA stays, we get a few lazy college students living off a minute form of benefits, especially considering the benefits they could receive if they just took unemployment benefit anyway. If EMA stays, bright, underprivileged children will be allowed to flourish with a small, but significant, financial contribution.
If the EMA goes, these bright young stars of the tomorrow generation will not receive the opportunity to pursue higher education, and their ambitions will fester. If EMA goes, the lazy college student buying luxuries with their EMA and the intellectual from a working class background end up in exactly the same position- unemployed, disenfranchised and disillusioned. They shouldn't be in the same position because of the financial situations of their family; it is the government's social responsibility to promote education and increase the chances of intelligent young people getting into university, regardless of their background. Even a ruthless utilitarian can see the benefits!
To conclude, a ridiculous, misguided cut that I'm sure the government took all of ten minutes discussing amongst the other cuts, if that.
@Will Firstly, I strongly suggest you stop hanging around with wastrels and drug addicts! The kids I know spend their money on books, food for college and clothes and are highly motivated unlike your friends. Secondly, so what if the kids show up for EMA? The statistics show very clearly that they gain from regular attendance at college since they are learning and gaining qualifications unlike the waste of spaces you hang out with; nobody I know is doing 'sweet FA'they are gaining their qualifications to get to university. If the government can spend 4billion on foreign aid then they can spare the 500million it costs to administer and deliver EMA for poorer kids.
Frankly, I'm still undecided by EMA. I'm in my second year of college and I have a number of friends who pay for bus tickets and food with their EMA, the sole purpose of the money.
However, I know of a number of students who use their EMA for expensive and unnecessary clothes, alcohol and cigarettes. Plus, the reason they receive EMA in the first place is because their parents are divorced and they put forward only one household income. I also know of many people who aren't particularly hard up, but because they are an only child they get EMA.
There are obviously different cases all over the country, but I find that EMA generally needed at least a review, taking into account how many children are in the family and whether their parents are divorced.
We're going to get confused here, because there is another 'Jamie' further up the comments section..I wrote the last message, just to be clear.
"Will" you shut up! you really do have a very blinkered view of students receiving EMA. My son started this year at a music college to follow his dream of a career in music. i have no doubt that he has great ability and i want him to follow his dream. he doesn't smoke , doesn't do drugs and is very sensible and serious about the plans he has for his future. the £30 he receives in EMA , for which you have to attend every day be punctual and you have to make the required progress in your studies to be able to continue receiving this necessary benefit, otherwise you will be removed from the course of study you are followiing. my son is doing a 2 year B-TEC course in musicianship.he hopes to follow this by going onto higher education and gain a music degree. Will, i think you must be on drugs to have such a narrow-minded true blue view of teenagers today. you obviously haven't had a teenage life yourself. try speaking to some normal teenagers and stop reading the tabloids.
This is absolute bollocks. The majority of EMA money is spent on crap, either food or alcohol. Why dont the government give vouchers to spend on educational goods?
Here's one particular case from my experience that probably relates to many others.
My uncle and aunt are divorced and my uncle is a multi millionaire. He has a fancy car, big house in the suburbs, pool, tennis courts, you name it, but my aunt has an income of £13,000. My 3 cousins received £30 a week each in EMA through their education, Although they lived with both parents and my uncle supported them in any and every way with whatever they needed. How is that just? How is that fair? I'm glad it's gone. Good riddance.
Mel: Why do these young people suddenly need money for food and clothes when they turn 16 , but apparently didn't need or receive it before that age?
In response to some of the very ignorant remarks made on here:
1)E M A bonuses no longer exist
2)How fortunate that person who cannot understand why some young people "suddenly" need money for books and dinners and bus fares, when they attend college,is!
I take it they never had to stand in line for a free school meal (not available in college). Or consider where the bus fare (80p each way in Greater Manchester) is coming from to travel to college (now their parents are under no legal obligation to ensure their child attends daily). Or have to find approx £50 for course compulsary text books in the first 2 weeks of college, as the college do not provide them!
Basicly there are young bright people in society still today, whose parents cannot afford these things, and more disturbing the even poorer ones whose parents will not provide them. This is the reason the money is paid to the young person and not their parent/parents.
Finally I would just like to point out to those kids who were in the "unfortunate" group not to be deemed poor enough to get this free money (because we all know how tough it must be to be living in a household of over £30,000 a year compared to one on just £8000), that the removal of EMA will effect their education also come next September.
In my area as many as 70% of students are in receipt of EMA, and when this is removed many of these will not be able to attend in September. Where I live college courses must meet a minimum number per class (about 15) or after about 5 weeks the class is axed! Yes, that is right, so all you unfortunates from your over £30,000 families may well see yourselves having to finish college next Autumn with just half an A Level!
The expression "what goes around comes around" springs to mind.:-)
By the way I am not an student, with an axe to grind.
Will, i agree that many people do take advantage of the EMA system, i'm a college student myself that doesn't get EMA and i find that the people that mess around and distract others from learning only come for EMA.
However a lot of hardworking people do require EMA in order to get to college on a daily basis aswell as purchase college supplies.
Many of my friends that are going to or have gone to university and are now very successful wouldn't have had that opportunity if it wasn't for EMA that payed for their £4 a day bus faires.
@ Jamie because they have things like school uniform which doesn't require constant replacement also text books are provided at school and poorer children have access to free school meals. College is a lot more expensive!
EMA is not only paid to young people attending college it is also paid to learners who attend work based learning provision. I work with this group of young people and now that while some spend there money on items for themselves a vast amount of them hand in some (if not all) of there allowance to help the family survive. No bonus payments are now paid to learners, and even when it was there was strict criteria as to what you could pay a bonus for and paying bonus for attendance was not was allowed.
The argument that some abuse this just does not stand up, this government has not even researched into this. According to them 90% of the young people would still attend FE, where has that figure come from; how many of you students out there was asked if you would continue to attend if your EMA was stopped?
Also, 500 million to keep it running, in the overall scheme of things that is a drop in the ocean. But, of course we will keep, free tv licence, fuel winter payments, free eye tests for pensioners without using some form of means testing, but of course this is the well off looking after their own.
EMA must be allowed to remain in place to help young people achieve a level of education which will help them progress and pay back into the system.
The majority of EMA is not spent on 'crap' at least not in the case of my son and his friends at college! And when since was needing to eat and spending EMA towards food 'crap'? Some people have an inflated sense of self-importance here. Look, so what if this is a bribe? Would you rather go back to the days when 45% of pupils dropped out of their college courses, wandering the streets and causing trouble instead? Where there was a real risk of an attack on a teacher or pupil? That 'bribe' has improved behaviour in class, has improved punctuality, has improved homework and discipline and has given a great incentive for kids to stay in college instead of dropping out. You who rail against EMA would be the first to shout if marauding youths were walking around bored witless and destroying your property instead of being in college as they should be. EMA is a brilliant idea and should be preserved instead of giving nearly 10 billion in foreign aid (not that I'm against aid)pinch off a bit of that and give it to our poorest kids.
Absolutley disgusting that they are cutting ema.how our kids ment to get to college and eat??This just means less kids going to college and university.No jobs available so will have to go on Jobs Seekers Allowance.What a joke
I beg pardon. NINE billion in foreign aid whilst stealing our children's education. Complete disgrace. I don't say don't help others but at a time when we're being asked to tighten our belts, I think the government should cut the foreign aid budget by at least half and give back to our children's future. Foreign aid can go back up again when it is sensible to do so.
I don't know how to start this message off but if you think of it from a poor person's perspective, they will choose to go to 6th form or college to get a better education, the EMA is then an insentive to stay in school and not drop out. I think they do need it due to more options being made more available at their age. For example being able to learn to drive or even though it's a bad example, but being able to drink and socialise with a lot of their peers. And getting to and from college or paying for food.
However a lot of people take advantage of the system but their is people I know who need the EMA to help pay for their familys food due to other cuts taking place.
And I agree that Osbourne, Cameron and Clegg can make these decisions because they had no hard times during childhood as money goes and nor will their children. The conservative approach will always benefit the rich and fuck the poor. No matter how much they cover up to say their proposals to help or affect everyone. "We're in this together", no, the poor are in it with the rich watching.
I think we need EMA to pay for food and college stuff as some mums dont get money for children when they turn 16. Also, for me and many otheres only go to college/6 form to get EMA so attendance will drop more if they get id of it. Have thye actually got rid of it then??
I'm a working single parent and my daughter who is in sixth form receives EMA. Without this money she won't be able to buy books or pay for Geography field work trips she has to attend as part of her course.
Does anyone know when this comes into effect??
My daughter is 15 and doing her A levels a year early. Next year she would have been able to claim EMA, at the moment I stuggle to make ends meet and I was relying on EMA to help my child get through her 6th form years as I am unsure if I will be able to afford all of the things she will need. I am on a low income and my daughter is a high achiever, this is a real blow to us as a family along with all the other cut backs that will effect us!!!! Looks like the rich are trying to keep the poor, POOR!!!!
@ Beth (student) I have been told that the EMA will go in April. The government claim it will be replaced by 'more targetted support' whatever that means!
Today my 25 year old son had his PhD viva and passed, so now he has a bio-medical PhD and can be called Doctor :D If he hadn't been able to get EMA when he was younger, then he might not have been able to go to college as we were not able to help him, both his father (now deceased) and I were on a very low income, and we did not give him any money after the age of 16. So without EMA would he have been celebrating today?
I have a daughter who is 15, I am not in a position to help her either, widowed parents allowance isn't very much, does this mean she won't be able to go to college and university as she wants to? I don't know.
It is appalling that the EMA has been scrapped. There are going to be vast amounts of teenagers who will not be able to afford to go to college know. Including some very clever teenagers. I am a single parent of two, who has always worked hard. I myself am currently a student at University studying an Occupational Therapy Degree. Have been discriminated against in previous employment due to my Dyslexia. My eldest child is 14 and I will be starting my final year when she will be starting a-levels. How it know looks is that I won't be able to get a job in Occupational Therapy, or maybe no job at all as its a professional Degree which also means I won't be able survive with both my keds or helpmy eldest out financially during her studies. And she won't be able to complete her a levels, go to university herself and become a social worker. She is a very mature and intelligent girl. I always said before the election, that there would be cuts on the most vulnerable people in our society and unfortunately I was right. The children, who are meant to be our future.
EMA helps alot of students out. currently i'm saving up all the money i can from EMA for uni since uni fees are going to go up to.
as for Osbourne proposing a 4 billion pound increase in foreign aid. Why can't we help the people who's country it really is before helping the other countrys??? we all may aswell swap countrys with africa all the african people move here all of us move there maybe then the government will be happy with a more "ethnic society" yay.
Will, you obviously are associating with the wrong type of people.
Mel, my daughters school does not supply text books. Her free school meals allowance is £1.95 per day, which cant get her a sandwich and a drink for her lunch. Her whole school has lunch at the same time and have 40 mins to eat. Most of the children cant get served lunch in the time they give them. Including my daughter some days. On those days, the school pocket her meals allowance. I am struggling to buy some of her gcse books know and uniforms. So don't know how I will pay for it all at sixth form when I will have just got my Degree and seeking employment myself.
Post new comment