Brown emerges and quashes ill-health rumours
How claims that Brown was receiving “psychological treatment” fell apart.
By George Eaton Published 17 June 2010 13:31
It was good to see Gordon Brown respond to claims that he's been spending stints at an Edinburgh hospital for "psychological reasons" with the wit for which he was once renowned.
On a visit to a school in his Kirkcaldy constituency, he told reporters:
The only times I've ever been in hospital were for the birth of my children, for my eyesight, for Fraser . . . and when I was once up a mountain with John Smith and accidentally stabbed myself in the leg with a penknife.
Guido Fawkes had claimed that Brown was receiving treatment at the Royal Edinburgh Hospital and, although he noted Brown's public appearance yesterday, he is yet to make a retraction. Over at Liberal Conspiracy, a contributor has pointed out that Brown is unlikely to have gone anywhere near Edinburgh Hospital for two reasons. First, he is in the wrong catchment area and second, it's inconceivable that the former prime minister wouldn't have been spotted in a hospital that has no private wards.
Speculation about Brown's health is legitimate enough (though I thought Andrew Marr's infamous question about prescription pills was entirely inappropriate), but the tone some commentators employ when doing so is crass, crude and thoughtless.
Guido, for instance, featured an image of the former Labour leader bearing the legend, "Is Brown bonkers?" One had hoped that society had evolved to the point where such comments had become as unacceptable as references to "cripples" or "spastics".
Elsewhere, there is evidence that Brown is enjoying his new-found freedom. The Telegraph's Tim Walker reports that the former PM is no longer forced to "tone down" his Scottish accent for English voters.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Jobs
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists

















10 comments
Spreading unfounded rumours like that is just a low blow. He got what he wanted when Brown resigned as PM, why can't he do the decent thing and leave the poor guy in peace FFS!
Well said Joel! GB has earned nothing but our gratitude for his efforts over the years.
Unlike other leaders I could mention, so far he hasnt been whoring himself out to the highest bidder, just so he can live in a f@***ng mansion with Zippy.
Damn... Macavity lives on !
How many lives has he used up ?
How many other lives has he 'messed' up ? !
And what if he had? His job is over - why should getting medical treatment be seen as a stain on someone's character?
Poor bloke - he can never win.
Staines, what an appropriate name in every way, for someone who is bankrupt in every way .
His name isn't Guido Fawkes, it's Paul Staines - and he's an overweight middle-aged man with an average education.
Funny how he always gets the gossip though. That afterall is what keep the punters clicking... he has a business to run you know!
When I questioned - over twitter - whether that would have been appropriate (even if true) believing it not to be in the public interest P. Stains felt so moved by the question he took the step of calling me at work for an expletive laden rant on his views on my right to criticise him.
I asked ITN why they were hiring such a bigot as Fawkes for their election night coverage. See here:
http://pogsurf.blogspot.com/2010/04/should-itv-hire-bigot-paul-staines.html
Silence was the stern reply.
Brown trashed the country - he merits unremitting, relentless, forensic scrutiny. Blair and the other bullying warmongers also. The unelected and unaccountable (Mandelson, Campbell, Whelan, McBride) must be brought to account.
Post new comment