Labour must be bolder as the storm brews
Despite Miliband's fine words, the party still clings to a busted economic model.
By Neal Lawson Published 30 August 2012 11:37
"There is a storm coming." It’s the last line from the first Terminator film. It’s a quote that haunts me. Its been gathering for a while now – not just in the economy but physically in the environment and emotionally in all of us. A palpable fear of a world going far beyond our control, in which we become lonelier, more isolated, anxious and insecure. We have lost the shoreline and there is, it seems, no captain to steer us home or lighthouse to warn us away from danger.
Of course the presence of a broken economy looms over everything. It’s not just that times are hard but the best we are offered is a return to business as usual – the booms and the busts, the inequality and the endless slog of the earn-to-spend treadmill – but our politicians cant even deliver on that miserable promise. There is pain but no gain as child poverty rises, health inequalities widen and the budget deficit grows. Poverty is returning to Europe – not my words but those of Jan Zijderveld, Unilever's European boss, on why the company is using marketing strategies designed for developing countries to sell their goods in Europe. A tunnel with no light at the end is a disorientating place to be.
Before you think I’m going to say something cheery we have to face an even bigger threat: that of ecocide. We all know something bad is happening to the planet. The scientific evidence stacks up but we can all see, hear, smell and touch. The weather isn’t right just as the sight of bees in the winter is alarmingly wrong. An economy out of control triggers a planet out of control. The ice melts at record rates. Serious water shortages await. Food prices rise as crops fail because temperatures soar. Energy and mineral prices go through the roof as both become scarcer. The poor are hit first and hardest. But we all will be hit eventually. No gates can be built high enough to thwart what’s coming.
Is this just more leftie doom and gloom? Maybe. You decide. But bad news usually tends to be even worse news for the left. Lenin is long rumored to have said "the worse it gets the better it gets", in the belief that from misery will come revolution. History doesn’t bear this out. The left thrives on hope and optimism. Caution and conservatism are more likely to spring from hard times. This is especially the case if the left fails to meet the challenges that confront us.
Fredric Jameson tells us what we already know to be true "that it is easier to imagine the end of the world than to imagine the end of capitalism". Which, as the new political season is about to kick off, brings us to our own backyard and the gaping chasm between what is and what needs to be in British politics.
There is a double arm lock in place. The crash revealed not just the weakness of the financial system but the incredible hold of neo-liberalism on our national psyche. It has become a truly "hegemonic project" in the words of Stuart Hall, recently interviewed in the New Statesman. To suffer such a potentially fatal blow as the biggest crash ever, but get up and carry on, reminds us of the Terminator films from which this article began. It is a system held firmly in place for many reasons but one is the British electoral system of first past-the-post – which purposefully denies the space for viable alternatives to grow as all the focus remains on a few swing voters in a few swing seats. To secure office means nothing must change. Surely something has to give between the epochal change taking shape all around us and business as usual at Westminster. But when and how?
Here we turn to Ed Miliband, Labour’s underestimated but still under-performing leader. His instincts are to be bold and radical. But his actions are too timid and cautious. Understandably, he feels hemmed in by his shadow cabinet and the PLP, too many of whom want just want one more heave - but without any heave. He has been proved right in his attack on "predatory" capitalism but has so far failed to either develop the concept or build the alliances and forces to make it happen. Labour, in effect, still clings to the same-busted economic model of trickle down from the City. And on public service reform, from welfare to the NHS, Labour paved the way for the Tories to do the same, only worse. Unless and until Labour breaks from its past, no one will believe it will be any different in the future.
It is still early but look across the channel to France and François Hollande. Yes, the left can find itself in office when right-wing governments contrive to lose but unless you go through the long hard process of renewing your political ideas and organisation then you never find yourself in a position of real power. As things stand, coming a close second to the fear of losing the next election is the fear of actually winning it. What would the left do about an economy and an environment that are out of control? To rebuild Britain we must rebuild not just Labour but a much wider and deeper political alliance for change. That is not just Miliband's job but that of everyone who wants a good society.
Gramsci advised us to live without illusions, without becoming disillusioned. In these grim times, we must look for the cracks in the system and find inspiration, hope and a toe hold for a better society. From Transition Towns to Community Links, from Citizens UK to 38 Degrees, from Greenpeace campaigners to UK Uncut, from the soon-to-be-launched pressure group Own It to UK Feminista, from Danny Boyle’s soft progressive sentiment to Joseph Stiglitz's hard new economy by way of Jon Cruddas running the Labour policy review and even, yes, the Liberal Democrats calling for a tax on wealth – a better way can and must be found.
Neal Lawson's column will appear every Thursday on The Staggers.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists




















9 comments
I completely agree about FPTP. This Country desperately needs a new electoral system, akin to those in Europe, I favour PR. Labour and Conservatives are coalitions themselves with different wings of the parties etc. The way nothing seems to change and all 3 are really no different is causing serious apathy in the UK, something very unhealthy in a democracy.
One major policy I would love Labour to adopt is the mansion tax. Property in England is under taxed and high house prices are shifting wealth from young to old. Taxes on property are impossible to avoid unlike those on income or capital gains. A mansion cannot be moved to Switzerland and failure to pay taxes due means the asset can be seized. Housing or lack of is a massive issue for my generation. Instead of giving billions to the banks why not start a mass house building programme? A mixture of social and affordable housing on a massive scale will reduce or even eradicate homelessness, stimulate the construction industry, create jobs, reduce the housing benefit bill and be a step toward a more equal society.
Isn't is about time Labour started egging on this Government to get stuck in? Use the old 'yellow' smear that the Tories always use against Labour. Syria and the MidEast are begging for it and we're the boys to give it to 'em.
Labour won by a landslide following the Second World War. In a war the inadequacies and frailties of this government will be more than obvious. The Tories were not in charge following the First and Second World Wars, were they? After the Korean Conflict they did not have the universal vote, and following Suez, whilst it took almost a decade, it was downhill all the way.
The British electorate need a good shaking and war in the region of the Middle East is just the ticket.
Force a show-down before Mitt and his Texas Rangers get into the saddle.
White Feather
For committed Blairites, it's worth looking at what the man said in 1941 :
"What England has never possessed is a socialist party which meant business *and* took account of contemporary realities. Whatever programmes the Labour Party may issue, it has been difficult for ten years past to believe that its leaders expected or even wished to see any fundamental change in their own lifetime."
- George Orwell : Fascism and Democracy
Well - if not perfect - the government that was formed some five years later did, to a considerable extent, confound that analysis. The result was that a social change was initiated that created a largely progressive frame that shaped the political agenda for 30 years. Anyone with a family narrative that stretches back to the first world war will know that the effects for most people were transformational.
History doesn't repeat, and the conflict now is not that of 1941 (even if the enemy is just as sinister). But the task in front of the Labour Party is a parallel one - the creation of an alternative, coherent narrative.
Interestingly, in the same essay, Orwell berates the left for leaving it to Churchill to express the then relevant narrative (of national purpose).
Can the current leadership of the Labour Party rise to the task of reframing the political debate?
It certainly won't do it by keeping silent or arguing that it's less nasty and a bit less austere than the coalition (that leaves the narrative with the government). It won't do it by aping outrage about benefit scroungers and welfare cheats - again, it leaves the narrative in Tory control.
It certainly won't do it by being psychologically in hoc to the nuliarbore strategic disaster (no - not necesary to recant - just go in the opposite direction an hard-nose it).
There is a narrative to be had. And it celebrates a sense of community and history and nationhood, and the reality of what those post-war years achieved (as opposed the the importation of a foreign ideology under Thatcher).
Why the f**k does it take Danny Boyle to gently point it out?
I think we need a more sophisticated approach than this.
Forget the storm metaphors, leave that to the poets! You need to clear your mind of images from popular films and focus on details.
What can we learn from the flawed histories of government policies? Can a model be forged from the tangle of mistakes, policy failures, flawed thinking, as opposed to producing policy from the generalities of an abstract model forged by out of touch academics?
There needs to be greater effort in bringing all the diverse communities that would support Labour together. Politically, Tories benefit from segregation between communities with people not relating to social values that are progressive and anti-sectarian. Labour's support is far too fragmented.
Quote:
Labour, in effect, still clings to the same-busted economic model of trickle down from the City. And on public service reform, from welfare to the NHS, Labour paved the way for the Tories to do the same, only worse. Unless and until Labour breaks from its past, no one will believe it will be any different in the future.
End Quote
............and it won't be.
New Labour - hi-jacked by a man and his cronies in pursuit of power and great wealth, his self serving, greedy MPs proved unable to resist.
Why would anyone trust them?
Super article giving very good perspective. I'm more pessimistic on the Labour party though. Not everyone involved in it is wrong but the Labour party is controlled by people who are essentially Tories just not as extreme as the current lot.
How else could you explain all that continuing privatisation and unsavoury approach to unemployment, sick and disabled etc? Not to mention the widening inequalities.
I've also been disturbed by some of Millibands comments social security.
From a slightly selfish point of view I can only hope that Scotland votes for indepedence and takes a different direction.
I just don't believe that a progressives can trust the Labour party anymore
"The left thrives on hope and optimism. "
It's a shame, that.
We're a cause of struggle and hardship and gearing up for a fight to make things better. Hope we can dig in.
Yes, why is it left to (the irrelevant) Clegg to act as cheerleader for a wealth tax? That's the kind of measure that Miliband should have put forward long ago.
Precisely. The mechanics may be difficult, but the principle is crystal clear. Of all the issues tainting the economy since the great neoliberal deregulation, it is the accumulation of unearned wealth and the corresponding increase in poverty and inequality that needs to be seriously addressed by any party that dares to claim a progressive agenda.