The Staggers

The New Statesman’s rolling politics blog

Syndicate contentRSS

Britain must defend Burma's Muslim Rohingyas

The abuse of the Rohingyas by the Burmese government is a human rights catastrophe.

The Rohingyas are not recognised as citizens by Burma.  Photograph: Getty Images
The Rohingyas have lived in Burma for generations, but under the 1982 Citizenship Law they are not recognised as citizens. Photograph: Getty Images.

The past year has seen impressive progress in Burma – the release of Aung San Suu Kyi and hundreds of political prisoners, preliminary ceasefires with many ethnic minorities in Burma and the first elections in 20 years which saw pro-democracy candidates elected to parliament.  Alongside this internal progress, international progress is being made with sanctions being suspended and political relationships starting to form, not least with an invitation from Prime Minister David Cameron to Burma’s President Thein Sein to visit the UK later this year.  

Burma’s President Thein Sein has been working hard to convince the world his government is changing.  Yet this story of progress and reform hides a far more complex and troubling truth. Burma is taking some initial, fragile steps towards democratisation, but there is still a very, very long way to go. Several hundred political prisoners remain in jail, a brutal war continues many ethnic minorities including the predominantly Christian Kachin people in northern Burma, and there are still systematic human rights abuses – civilians in Kachin talk of forced labour, torture and extra judicial killings and at least 75,000 people have been forcibly displaced.

And there is the tragedy that is the plight of the Muslim Rohingyas. In June, a devastating cycle of violence spiralled out of control in Arakan State in western Burma. Sparked by the rape and murder of a Buddhist Rakhine woman allegedly by Muslim Rohingyas, decades of racial and religious hatred erupted into several weeks of sectarian violence in which hundreds were killed, dozens of villages torched and at least 90,000 people displaced. Both communities committed violence, but the Rohingyas were the primary victims.

The effects were seen far wider than Arakan State. Throughout Burma, and among Burmese exiled communities abroad, including in the UK, blatant and shocking anti-Muslim racism came to the fore with threats against Rohingyas as well as those who campaign for them and crude comments on social media depicting the Rohingyas as “Bengalis” and “terrorists”.

Back in Burma, as the violence subsided, the security forces began a violent crackdown going house to house arresting Rohingyas who have now seemingly disappeared without charge and without trial. Those who could flee had nowhere to run except the jungle. Those who could not flee faced jail or death. This is a human rights and humanitarian catastrophe in the making.

Underlying this entire issue is the question of citizenship. The Rohingyas have lived in Burma for generations, but under the 1982 Citizenship Law they are not recognised as citizens. The Burmese government, and many in Burmese society, describe them as “illegal immigrants”. For years, they have faced severe restrictions on marriage, movement, education and religion in Burma, because they are deemed “foreigners”. They are among the most persecuted, marginalised people in the world.

Bangladesh, however, will not take them either. Although an estimated 200,000 Rohingya refugees have lived in dire conditions along the Bangladesh-Burma border for years, Bangladesh refuses to give sanctuary to any more. Those fleeing the current crisis have been turned back from the border, sent to face an uncertain fate. Those who have escaped from Burma on boats have been turned away from Bangladesh’s shores, often to die in stormy seas or be shot at by Burmese troops.

In early July, President Thein Sein escalated the crisis even further, by reportedly telling the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees that his government will not recognise them. On the same day Britain opened a trade office in Naypyidaw and the US lifted sanctions, Thein Sein wanted to hand the entire ethnic group to the UNHCR to look after until they could be resettled in a third country. He described the 800,000 Rohingyas in Burma as “a threat to national security”.

There is an urgent need for international pressure on President Thein Sein, to repeal the 1982 Citizenship Law and introduce a new law that is based on international norms and human rights. No one born in Burma should be denied citizenship. No ethnic group should be written off as “a threat to national security”. Such racial and religious intolerance is unacceptable.

The British government must make this issue a priority. If Burma is to become a truly free nation, with all the responsibilities and benefits that come with that, it must respect human rights for all its people. Britain must push for open access for humanitarian aid and human rights monitors to all areas of Burma, the release of all political prisoners and for an immediate stop to the violence and persecution - including rewriting the Citizenship Law.  Without this, the process of reform and reconciliation in Burma cannot move forward.

45 comments

shahrukhhh's picture

if u kill dem 2day den GOD wil kil u 2marrrooo!! understanDDDD????

JAVEED ISMAIL MAMSA's picture

MY REQUEST FOR ROHINGYAS ,ACCORDING TO THIN SEIN ,ROHINGYAS PEOPLE ARE NOT CITIZEN OF MYMAR , KEEP YOU CITIZEN OF MYANMAR WITH YOUR,BECAUSE NOBODY NEED YOU CITIZEN OF MYANMAR. YOU ARE WORLD NO 1 POUR COUNTRY ,EVEN USA. CANADA, BRITAIN AND MANY WEST COUNTRY,THEY GIVE THEIR CITIZEN IF ANY ONE LIVE THERE 3 YEARS ,BECAUSE THEY KNOW TRUE MEANING OF DEMOCRATIC .YOU MYANMAR NEVER CAN KNOW THE MEANING OF DEMOCRATIC ,BECAUSE YOU USE TO LIVE IN COMMUNISM , NO BODY CAN CHANGE YOU LUCK UNLESS YOU WENT ,FOR ROHINGYAS ENTIRE MUSLIM WORLD ARE PREPARING TO HELP SUCH AS FINANCIAL AND SETTLE IN MANY MUSLIM COUNTRIES ,THERE ARE GOING TO MEATING IN MAKHA FOR SOLUTION OF YOUR, TELL THEN STAY THEY WITH PAISAION , AND FOR BURMA GOVERMENT STOP ATTATCK TO MUSLIM PEOPLE IN MYANM OR MUSLIM WORLD DECLAR WORE ( JEHARD ) WITH BUDISH MYANMAR..

JAVEED ISMAIL MAMSA's picture

MY REQUEST FOR ROHINGYAS ,ACCORDING TO THIN SEIN ,ROHINGYAS PEOPLE ARE NOT CITIZEN OF MYMAR , KEEP YOU CITIZEN OF MYANMAR WITH YOUR,BECAUSE NOBODY NEED YOU CITIZEN OF MYANMAR. YOU ARE WORLD NO 1 POUR COUNTRY ,EVEN USA. CANADA, BRITAIN AND MANY WEST COUNTRY,THEY GIVE THEIR CITIZEN IF ANY ONE LIVE THERE 3 YEARS ,BECAUSE THEY KNOW TRUE MEANING OF DEMOCRATIC .YOU MYANMAR NEVER CAN KNOW THE MEANING OF DEMOCRATIC ,BECAUSE YOU USE TO LIVE IN COMMUNISM , NO BODY CAN CHANGE YOU LUCK UNLESS YOU WENT ,FOR ROHINGYAS ENTIRE MUSLIM WORLD ARE PREPARING TO HELP SUCH AS FINANCIAL AND SETTLE IN MANY MUSLIM COUNTRIES ,THERE ARE GOING TO MEATING IN MAKHA FOR SOLUTION OF YOUR, TELL THEN STAY THEY WITH PAISAION , AND FOR BURMA GOVERMENT STOP ATTATCK TO MUSLIM PEOPLE IN MYANM OR MUSLIM WORLD DECLAR WORE ( JEHARD ) WITH BUDISH MYANMAR..

true's picture

how many of you individuals on here slating muslims and Islam have actually taken the time to read up on the religion......(not media articles)... but actual scripture....mr joe bloggs!!!!!!.........calling an entire religious entity "paedo" is non sensical look at the history of England or France or the states and at that time approx 1400 years ago and look at the ages of individuals getting married then.....?????
as for Burma and the Goverment and the Rakhine people violating the basic humman rights of Rohingye people. im afraid it is religious hatred and genocide.
and its prevalent throughout the world look at the poor palestinians who have been taken over by israel to the extent, that world maps have changed and it is now called isreal and the gaza strip( 70 yrs ago it was all palestine)In international law they are seen as occupants of palestinian lands. it is a shame that the world leaders support these countries. how can one not think that its a war against a religion. To be honest the media just perpetuate this hatred.
"One mans terrorist is another mans freedom fighter"...................

Bernd Eberlein's picture

The socalled Rohingya are BANGLADESHI. They are overhelmingly economic refugees from Bangladesh.
There is only ONE SOLUTION to that problem:
The Bangladeshi have to be repatriated in their country of origin: That is Bangladesh. The REPATRIATION should be financed from richer countries of the world community. The refugees should get a piece of land, a small house and some capital to start a livelihood.
In NO CASE Myanmar should be burdened with that problem as that would mean endless future conflicts and bloodshed.

tahid 's picture

I can understand why you saying this...you being a jew want all palestians out of their homeland,same way you want rohingya out from country in which they lived for centuries

tahid 's picture

I can understand why you saying this...you being a jew want all palestians out of their homeland,same way you want rohingya out from country in which they lived for centuries

tahid 's picture

I can understand why you saying this...you being a jew want all palestians out of their homeland,same way you want rohingya out from country in which they lived for centuries

JSmith's picture

Groups like the Taliban, instead of rattling their sabres should do something beneficial for a change, if they can understand that concept. Ask their governments to take in the Rohingya. These countries use their immense wealth to buy all sorts of ludicrous luxuries but they can't offer their Muslim brothers a home?

Texan's picture

Over in Texas we push back the Mexicans across the Rio Grande everyday. No one complains.

haja's picture

1982 Citizenship Law should be change ....,give human right to all religious people especially muslim and christian in burma

The Sail's picture

The truth can't be hidden, the world know who are the most persecutors historically. Quasi-gov and Rakhine leaders trying to portray the matter is not ethnic cleansing. But from the beginning, the Law and Order have not been applied on aggressive Rakhines, the local security forces have been permitted to shot Rohingyas, seizing Rohingya people's lands and forcing them into tents, rejecting their rights, blocking aid and compelling to die from starvation, and handing over to relocate at another country, are very clear part of undeniable fats.
Yet the government indulges the Rakhine people while Rakhine people party- RNDP is being the in-charge for Arakan state.

Let see how the both sides affected here;
-in the whole Sittwe there are less than 500 Rakhines displaced are from about 40 houses of Mingan village, and
-less than 5,000 Rakhines from 6 Rakhine model villages of Maungdaw.
But the government and RNDP authority gathered all of Rakhines and wrongfully presenting as homeless. We long experienced social workers are not blind, even we don't talk we see them all..

From muslims side, about 20,000 of Rohingya houses from (55) villages and at least (43) mosques from seven different towns of Sittwe, Maungdaw, Rathedaung, Kyauktaw, Rambre, Myebon and Pauktaw townships were burnt down and more than (100,000) Rohingyas are displaced and shelter- less in these regions.
The homeless muslim people of Rathedaung, Kyauktaw, Rambre, Myebon and Pauktaw townships are suffering the worst because the gov blocked us from distribution aid.

Don't ever blame on Rohingya or muslim of Burma, they never attacked other group in the history. Now trying to portray the murder of Rakhine girl by 3 Rohingyas was also wrong. The muslim in Rambre town are mostly Kaman muslims but not Rohingya. And a suspect case of murder was swiftly charged death sentence. The funny thing like thousand of the other political prisoner serve?
And the local news and anti-Rohingya groups repeatedly airing this single individual crime case, is just trying to cover up the ongoing genocide against Rohingyas in Arakan? None of those Rakhine involved in violent attacks is yet arrested??
The following groups arrested were also released;
1) 17 Rakhines who worn muslim religious dresses and leaving after attacking of Rohingya village- Khaungdok (Khondol), were arrested by military on 17 June.
2) 9 Rakhines from Nagaya village who were arrested with arms at around 18:00pm of 16 June and for involving in an arson attack of Rohingya village, were released after the protest of about 500 Rakhines protested in a park of Kyauktaw town on 17 June.
3) a groups of 7 Rakhines arrested with arms from Maungdaw,
4)several groups of Rakhines with deadly weapons and fule bottles during the riots in Sittwe.
We are not stupid man..
5) arrested about 100 from 300 of those attacked police station in protest relating to Nazi market tendering on 3 June 2012..
Let is what is the next move of Rakhine and the quasi gov.. We are not stupid man..
The case is very clear that only aggressive Rakhine people went to attack Rohingya village???

The reality is there are also ongoing wars in other parts of Burma with minorities. The gov and majority could not hide them even they can blame on defenseless Rohingya. But no mater what ever happen with these minorities of Christian or Muslim, the UN and US and its UN will not involve effectively so they might defend by themselves. Nevertheless, UN and its members have to arm them.

Tausif Nakhuda's picture

If its not. Fack image...then we all have to stop this because. We are also a human being. No one right to kill any one. I requse u to please stop all this. God please help them.

Tausif Nakhuda's picture

If its not. Fack image...then we all have to stop this because. We are also a human being. No one right to kill any one. I requse u to please stop all this. God please help them.

Tausif Nakhuda's picture

If its not. Fack image...then we all have to stop this because. We are also a human being. No one right to kill any one. I requse u to please stop all this. God please help them.

Tausif Nakhuda's picture

If its not. Fack image...then we all have to stop this because. We are also a human being. No one right to kill any one. I requse u to please stop all this. God please help them.

Tausif Nakhuda's picture

If its not. Fack image...then we all have to stop this because. We are also a human being. No one right to kill any one. I requse u to please stop all this. God please help them.

Posh Tosh's picture

I think we ought defend our Christian people in Britain.

Markus's picture

Christians in our country are not persecuted for being Christian.

Habib's picture

you buddhist dont have right to kill any one, you will get back the answer soon,wait and watch.

Amit Sharma's picture

So you want to say that only muslims have the rights to kill others.

Markus's picture

No one has the right to kill anyone because of the religion or race, etc

Markus's picture

No one has the right to kill any one because of the religion or race, etc

Amit Sharma's picture

So you want to say that only muslims have the rights to kill others.

sheikh shahzad's picture

u says in wrong way no one have rights to kill human being and for ur kind of information islam teach only love n peace mind it and if u have any doubts then learn holy quran it will gives u mind to think got it

Amit Sharma's picture

So you want to say that only muslims have the rights to kill others.

Red Rain's picture

Now why would a sane man wish to attack a Buddhist?

Matt Doscki's picture

"Those who have escaped from Burma on boats have been turned away from Bangladesh’s shores, often to die in stormy seas or be shot at by Burmese troops."?

Stormy seas? Do you know how they cross into Bangladesh. There are many different routes to go to Bangladesh. You know nothing about demographics and geography of Rakhine state. In northern Rakhine, majority is Rohingyas. Thanks to the porous border, lack of rule of law and the mess left by British colonial government.

AmCA's picture

Yes, you're absolutely right there are so many routes Rohingya can cross into Bangladish or into Burma! People has been crossing by land, by rivers from overcrowded poor neighboring Bangladish for years partially fault to weak border control perhaps due to past Burma's weak government system and weak immigration laws! Also left to sort out generations of people British thoughtlessly brought into Burma as laborers durng their colonial rule! It messed up and left beind complications for many small countries such as Burma! Thanks a lot for exploitive colonial era!

No, there are no other fancy words to put illegal immigration, it's Illegal Immigration! Whatever organization, a reporter writes any bias view become news that is harmful for Burma sovereity, every reponsible Myanmar and world citizen should speak up for the truth and rights for Myanmar people! Every country in the world has their sovereighty so is Burma!

Many big countries are dealing with illegal immigration issues left and right, no one group or organization is bother to nit pick or critizie as the way some are nit picking, bullying to Burma! If bias people taking Rohingya side baselessly, neither they live in Burma nor a part of Burma, not a care of Burma"s wellbeing, only their agenta to achieve I don't know what probably not good and disrepecting the rights of native ethnic Rakhines living in their own ancestor land!

Burma has been the home of multiethnic multireligions for centuries, have admiringly peaceful existence. Let me sincerely make it clear for those who don't have the chance to know Burma, it was not a religious conflict what happened in Rhakhine State as some news reports, to anybody who writeand spread any false bias hateful news or views which is harmful to Myanmar is clearly not the friend of Myanmar nor have the best interest of Myanmar!

We are proud of our country and our heritage that are full of grace, peaceful with generosity and spirituality!

Markus's picture

@Matt
The author is describing ONE of the ways Burmese muslims flee to Bangladesh.
If you refer to an atlas you will see, quite clearly, that it is possible to travel from Rakhine state, Burma to Bangladesh by land or by sea. I think that you should, in future, refrain from accusing the author without knowledge.

Pyi Chit's picture

Both communities committed violence, but the Rohingyas were the primary culprits. They raped, killed and burnt properties of non-Rohangyas who are just the minority in many Villages where the majority population is Rohangyas. The Rakhine people are scared of violent Rohingya mobs. Religion is not the main issue. Millions of non-Rohingyas enjoy living through out Myanmar. Muslim groups should not label it as a primary religious issue.

Which country on Earth will give citizenship right to children born to non-citizens? If none, why should Myanmar do that? Myanmar is still a poor country. Myanmar can't sustain population explosion especially in Rakhine State. Critics should ask themselves what they will do if similar situations occur in their own countries before criticizing others.

Most Myanmar Citizens have no sympathy for Rohingyas who do not attempt to live in harmony or mix with them, often demanding citizenship and autonomy.

Red Rain's picture

"Bangladesh refuses to give sanctuary" If their fellow Muslim's can't be bothered why should we? This epidemic of rape committed by Muslims apparently affects the whole world. The Burmese have every right to defend their women form rapists. "Britain must push for open access for humanitarian aid and human rights monitors to all areas of Burma" No!! Britain needs to keep out of other sovereign nations internal affairs.

haja's picture

dont think buddhist people are good compare to muslim more than 1500 women were raped and killed by buddhist millitary......,by some of few (two r three)rohghinya people's mistake that lead to blaming the whole muslim minority group....,proper people whose incharge of rape and killing of non roghinya people should be punished ...,pls dont kill the innocent people of roghinya....,human must give value to live to other ....,dont support religion be a humanitarian.........

haja's picture

dont think buddhist people are good compare to muslim more than 1500 women were raped and killed by buddhist millitary in SRILANKA......,by some of few (two r three)rohghinya people's mistake that lead to blaming the whole muslim minority group....,proper people whose incharge of rape and killing of non roghinya people should be punished ...,pls dont kill the innocent people of roghinya....,human must give value to live to other ....,dont support religion be a humanitarian........

moemoezed's picture

So your saying its ok to kill and burn people alive, including babies?

moemoezed's picture

So your saying its ok to kill and burn people alive, including babies?

Derek Tonkin's picture

The issue of citizenship is controversial. "The law of each State determines who are its nationals" (Anthony Aust - "Handbook of International Law"). The UK has no standing to tell the Burmese Government who should and who should not be a Burmese citizen.

Human rights law requires that stateless persons resident in the territory of a State should be treated with compassion and humanity. This quite clearly has not happened. The Burmese Government should also seek by every means available to them to resolve the issue of statelessness. But the "right to a nationality" is poorly established in public international law. The Universal Declaration on Human Rights is not legally binding and the various Conventions on statelessness etc. have only limited take-up.

So while there might be strong moral grounds for pressing the Burmese Government to resolve the issue, there are no grounds in international law for putting pressure on the Burmese Government specifically to revise their 1982 law. Many Muslims had their chance under the 1948 Citizenship (Election) Act to acquire Burmese citizenship, and those who were eligible had until 1982 to do so. I agree though that many might well have not known what to do.

A UN-backed international commission to tackle the issue might be best.

Pyi Chit's picture

The problem with 800, 000 Rohingyas in Myanmar can be compared and contrasted to the life of the author of this article. Her family had moved to the UK from Bangladesh when she was a young kid. She wrote in her own autobiography that her family's migration was part of a long tradition of people (Bangladeshi) who emigrated (UK in her case) to build a better future for themselves and the people around them. That is fair enough if it is through legal route, and to a richer country. I admire her for being open and honest about her immigrant past.
In contrast, Rohingyas who also live in Bangladesh, crossed the border into Myanmar illegally over many decades, bribed corrupt immigration officials and continue to create social, cultural, religious and political issues to Myanmar which is still a very poor country (163rd poorest in the world). Many Myanmars children are poorer than the Rohingyas shown in the photo, based on clothings they wear. Children in remote Myanmar villages can't afford decent clothings, often having nothing above waist.

haja's picture

dont think buddhist people are good compare to muslim more than 1500 women were raped and killed by buddhist millitary in SRILANKA......,by some of few (two r three)rohghinya people's mistake that lead to blaming the whole muslim minority group....,proper people whose incharge of rape and killing of non roghinya people should be punished ...,pls dont kill the innocent people of roghinya....,human must give value to live to other ....,dont support religion be a humanitarian........

Tin Win's picture

Who entered into Burma illegally?
In 1942, about 100,000 thousands Rohingya were massacred cold-bloodedly by Rakhine Buddhists in Kyauktaw and other nearby cities. Soon after thousands of others families were dragged away forcefully by Military junta to Buthidaung and Maungdaw, the two border cities with Bangladesh. Again after military coup in 1962 and after wards, there took a number of military operations that pushed thousands of Rohingya to other countries making Rohingya diasporas in many countries such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE, India, Thailand, Malaysia totaling about 1.5 millions.
Within last 70 years, if nearly half of the Rohingya Muslims were forced out of the country, then who is daringly saying that Bengalis Muslims from Bangladesh border entered into Burma illegally? In fact the real history is the other way around where about 80,000 Rakhines who lived in Bangladesh for centuries entered to Arakan, Burma in 1972 just after Bangladesh independence by state sponsored program and most of them were provided with houses and jobs. Then who is right and who is wrong? And who entered Arakan, Burma illegally, Rohingya or Rakhine.

Derek Tonkin's picture

Hi Pyi Chit. As I expect you guessed, the photo has nothing to do with recent communal violence in Rakhine State. I was taken over three years ago. According to the Getty Images website: "Burmese Rohingya wait in a crowded room for malaria test results at special clinic for malaria on May 4, 2009 in Sittwe, Arakan state, Myanmar (Burma). The majority of the patients treated belong to the Rohingya Muslim minority who live in Muslim neighborhoods in Sittwe.........." Photographer: Paula Bronstein. Image No. 86882117 .

haja's picture

dont think buddhist people are good compare to muslim more than 1500 women were raped and killed by buddhist millitary......,by some of few (two r three)rohghinya people's mistake that lead to blaming the whole muslim minority group....,proper people whose incharge of rape and killing of non roghinya people should be punished ...,pls dont kill the innocent people of roghinya....,human must give value to live to other ....,dont support religion be a humanitarian.........

Derek Tonkin's picture

Hi Pyi Chit. The photo was taken on 4 May 2009, according to the Gety Imgaes website. The (long) caption begins: " Burmese Rohingya wait in a crowded room for malaria test results at special clinic for malaria on May 4, 2009 in Sittwe, Arakan state, Myanmar (Burma). The majority of the patients treated belong to the Rohingya Muslim minority who live in Muslim neighborhoods in Sittwe......."

joe bloggs's picture

The brainwashed psychotic violent followers of the 7th century Arab paedo seem to cause trouble wherever they go. Why on earth should I give a toss about these savages and their barbaric superstitions?

Sha's picture

Yet another stupid, racist uninformed comments by an individual who would seek to perpetuate (you can look it up in the dictionary) the growing tide of mistrust, hatred and cruelty between people of different backgrounds. Thanks for not helping anyone Mr. JOE BLOGGS.

Perhaps the world would be a better place without people like you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

By the way, I used to be rather close-minded as you seem to be (although without the measure of stupidity that you display) but i changed with age, and i hope maybe you might too. Perhaps Mr Tonkins could help you become a better person acting on less- misinformation.

Latest tweets