Mehdi Hasan

Mehdi Hasan’s polemical take on politics, economics and foreign affairs

Syndicate contentRSS

Rick Santorum's baby - a follow-up

Damian Thompson and others on the right are trying to demonise me for reporting a story that Santoru

293 comments

jankaas's picture

"what a great comeback"

i know.

yours though was an embarrassment SucksDicks.

Steff's picture

If the death of Santorums baby has been public knowledge for a decade and his wife wrote a book about it, how come it appears in an article titled '10 Things you DIDN'T know about Rick Santorum'?

The worst thing is though, I get the feeling that even if this had not previously been public knowledge, you would still have included it in your article as a bit of a 'point and laugh at the weirdo' attempt to ridicule him.

Buckskins's picture

"yours though was an embarrassment"

To you Jackass.

Is this all you can do with your time? Have you considered getting a life. You are either thick skinned or thick in the head, probably both. Don't you get tired having sweet Julia kick your ass every time she shows up? I'm starting to think you like it.

Julia Harris's picture

@ Steff, FYI, I have no interest in spreading any misinformation and yes they are shocking stats that the left wing media, Islamist’s like Mehdi and the PC brigade don’t want you to hear about.

No doubt too many here I am a/the racist Islamaphobic bigot. The people committing criminal acts and in many cases the Muslims who are killing Muslims have got nothing to answer for? Are they not the true Islamaphobes as it is they who are killing Muslims??

I am the problem of course... if I go away the killings and repression will stop?? No, it won’t, you just won’t hear about it... Then the likes of Mehdi Hassan and his pro Sharia and Pro Islamic view of the world would be allowed to percolate without question.
The left wing media in the UK, the NS, the BBC which often takes it cues from the Guardian are wicked self hating and anti-Semitic institutions.

They are culpable of glossing over the real facts, sugar coating Islam with a view of cultural and religious relativity – and ultimately fail to bring the whole picture to the UK public for fear of being labelled by there colleagues – bigots or Islamaphobes if anyone should dare try to speak the truth.
Truth is the new hate speech...

Des Demona's picture

@ Mehdi

You may well have included the comment 'without any criticsm or rebuke' but that those are weasely words. The implied mockery of the way someone chooses to grieve for their dead child isn't what I would consider an acceptable inclusion in an article in the NS.
There is a differenence between 'polemical' and 'dick'.

Your outright mockery and sweeping generalisation of 'below the line' posters goes on to show you aren't aware of the balance.

Julia Harris's picture

@ Jackass, as I have said, you’re not worth bothering with but I will indulge you this once. However anyone who reads your posts will see what a real Idiot and Fool you are.

If people are too stupid to see the wood from the tree’s so beit, all I can do is make the best case I can and let the free thinkers indulge and the fools like Jackass spout there psycho babble conspiracy theories, nothing is as it seems, it’s all our fault, it’s all because of Iraq clap trap

andyg's picture

@ Sir Michael.
Yes I concede the point and fully endorse your persistence.
Do you think that she/he will give advice regarding the dress code?

Buckskins's picture

Thanks Jackass for your astute and brilliant insights into the candidates for the Republican party leadership. As a Dutchman that resides in the UK your grasp and expertise on their abilities is breath taking.

BTW. most of them are self made Millionaires with one Billionaire. I doubt they made it in the cake and pastry business, but who knows? There could be an incognito World Famous Rock Star among them.

Politico's picture

Message to the New Statesman Owner/Editor.

I really do think it is time that Mr Hasan moved onto greater pastures. He neither creates the atmosphere or the environment for good debate.

This article is a childish and self serving rant from an individual who not only acts well above his station but lacks intellectual capability.

Persistently copying and pasting other quotes and providing little in the way of the basis for meaningful debate is counter productive. Moe individuals are turning away from the New Statesman due to individuals who are encouraging Hasan to write nonsense.

His actions are not what I would associate with good ethics within the code of journalism.

He needs to move on before the New Stateman regrets it.

His columns are very one sided personalised and are a turn off.

Julia Harris's picture

Sir Michael, I don’t have a problem with people that disagree with my views, where did I say that? It was you who made a highly insulting post to me and I retorted calmly with my tongue firmly in my cheek. Its clear to see you are an Idiot.

john woods's picture

Why was my comment censored?

andyg's picture

@ Buckskins
Why would the hones teacher kick a Donkey? Doesn't he/she like animals as well as Humans. Maybe we could dress them in green? Your Julia(n) appears to like green.

john woods's picture

Hasan says: "Btw, can you imagine a headline which read "Indulgence of Judaism is harming society" ?

I said: no, but then the Jews are not blowing up tube trains, pimping under age white girls, putting em in kebabs, demanding that authors and cartoonists that they disapprove of be murdered, conducting female circumcision, spitting on white women who have the nerve to walk through Jewish areas or demanding that their court system take preference over the laws of the land.

jankaas's picture

@andyg

"Truth Jankaas is always the first casualty with the racist "

which is why they are so readily exposed. it's like shooting fish in a barrel.

"Julia is really Julian"

omg. if that is so then Buckskins is trying to hit on a bloke!

jankaas's picture

@Awake

"half the readers are so chippy or defensive they can't read you objectively"

not sure you make sense here. Julia has provided some data, and has dome something subjective with them (i.e. provided her personal opinion/conclusions of what the data mean. she claims the data prove Muslims = bad)

i then pointed out that her conclusion is not logical and therefor seriously flawed. the reason i gave was because some of these very Think Tanks that provided her raw data, also unequivocally advise that married couples experiencing relationship difficulties could go to their local Mosque for valuable advise and help.

so what am i doing wrong in pointing out this glaring contradiction? or was i not in that "half" of the readers you refer to so disparagingly? do tell.

Martin's picture

This is terrifically childish, isn't it? Also boring.

"@ns_mehdihasan @holysmoke If you've got a couple of pins handy stick them in your eyes. More enjoyable and productive"

This is the comment editor for the Telegraph, the political editor of the New Statesman and a published historian.

What was the word count for this blog post? 1500?

"You're weird and sinister!"

"No, *you're* weird and sinister!"

Powerful minds looked in combat. Exhilarating stuff.

jankaas's picture

"Jackass"

yes ScrewYoulia..?

"as I have said, you’re not worth bothering with but I will indulge you this once."

which you then don't. you just rant away, fantasising about me proposing "psycho babble conspiracy theories" (? link pls to any post of mine that does this), and of course failing to address the serious issue i raised. can you even remember the salient point i made about some of your data sources? no?
simples; the very same people who, according to you, have found that Muslims are a clear and present danger, in fact recommend Mosques as an excellent place to get marriage councilling....!

...your failure to explain this gigantic contradiction about Muslims is what matters you silly little bigot. care to have a real go, or is it all too much for your intellect?

perhaps you are only able to hurl shit and abuse at anyone who dares to question your posts. how very totalitarian of you.

Politico's picture

One other thing Medhi. You know very little on international relations theory and the global political economy.

Amateur

Fraziel1's picture

@julia, I believe the stats and it is worrying and we all know the left hate statistics and proper debate. I am just saying calm down a bit, it will help your cause.

@Mustafa, well said mate for showing up that clown Buckskins for the ignorant oaf he is.After his comment about Christians generally not raping and murdering he should not have the brass neck to ever come on here again. Talk about making yourself look a moron.

To be expected for an American though, we all know they have smaller brains.

And santorum is still a dangerous half mad lunatic, as many republican candidates appear to be these days. Only in the land of the free would people vote for them and that tells you everything you need to know.

jankaas's picture

@Des

"It is not my argument."

i accept this is true, but you do give it some credence rather than call it for what it is; shameless hate mongering.

"Just pointing out that sometimes common sense is required rather than courting controversy."

and i must say that my common sense dictates that i can't allow minorities to be silenced if i place any personal value on the principles of free speech and freedom of expression. controversy be damned, this is about Democratic principles. i think if you made the subject of your advice the Gay Community, you would not find yourself even trying to hand out such instructions? or would you?

jankaas's picture

^

i'm gonna take notes if that's ok? always willing to learn something valuable.

Julia Harris's picture

Your an Uber left Islamist columnist and your writing a 10 point article about a right wing US politician it stands to reason that people will associate your highlighting of this fact with a derogatory view of him / his family as this is how people associate you and your view of people on the political right.
I don’t understand why you would mention the death of their baby even it was documented it shows a lack of judgement on your part – there was no need to.

David's picture

@Julia Harris: You would do much better if you stopped calling people idiots, since it's abundantly clear that you cannot communicate properly in English. If you can't tell the difference between 'your' and 'you're' and don't understand when to use appropriate punctuation, you have no right to start calling others idiots. I'm saying this for your own good.

jankaas's picture

"To you Jackass."

i would hazard a guess Sweet SucksDicks, that all those who read your infantile misogynist post would come to the exact same conclusion; that 'comeback' was an embarrassment.

maybe you can ask Sweet Julia if she thought it was a good one?

Julia Harris's picture

@ David, your missing the point, its not about punctuation, its about the content and meaning - that's the important stuff.

If you want to mark people on grammar and using correct English go and teach at a school.

Terrible But True's picture

I think I am outraged about the outrage here about other folks outrage.

Which is surely enough for an inquiry to be held and Newsnight to do a special.

Isn't it?

Two extremes from the MSM infirmament find a way to drive the ratings that sustain them and... bingo!

Makes one feel all warm and fuzzy.

Next... Laurie Penny disses Neo-Guido. Or is it his turn?

So much to flounce around, so little time. Or is that sh*t being given outside a very small, nasty bubble?

jankaas's picture

@Sir M

"I will free admit to being entirely capable of being a "stupid little twat".."

haha! well said, and count me in, I'm Spartacus too!

indeed it's one's ability to do such, and learn from it, that makes me return to blogs. especially in the down season when i can't go windsurfing. so till april....

jankaas's picture

@Politico

"Amateur"

for all his faults in this specific article, and his defense of it, isn't Mehdi the one who earns a living from this stuff? and you..?

Julia Harris's picture

Buckskins, as usual, you are quite right, its sick and disgusting.

This latest stunt is up there when Mehdi 'USED' Tariq Jahan who had just lost his son in the brummie riots to his political advantage with two article's on the NS.

Then there was the political point scoring with his questions and the man had just buried his son. Mehdi also held this guy up as a positive example of the Muslim community but as many said at the time who was Tariq Jahan that he should be held up like this and his views on how to run the country be heard?

We were proved right as since he has been accused and charged with breaking driver's jaw and knocking out two of his teeth, a great upstanding person we should listen to.

Julia Harris's picture

@ Jackass, ROFL, you are such a Muppet.
One line taken out of paragraph (from somewhere and out of context) that bundles together the main places of worship in some kind of general statement doesn’t mean shit. It doesn’t disprove anything I have said; it doesn’t make your case that the statistical data I/they presented is contradictory and worthless.

So what if this organisation should collect statistical information regarding Muslims and it turns out to be negative - it’s not the bloody fault of the people collecting the data that Muslims carry these points of view, is it... understand?

Subsequently, if this paragraph didn’t include mosque in that paragraph you’d say something like...”see, they hate Muslims, they haven’t included Mosque in with Churches and Synagogues and then try to disprove it that way.
As I said, you cant win with an idiot like you, how try’s to be oh so clever, but really doesn’t come up with anything, can you see how stupid your being?

It does show you are clutching at straws, trying to make a case out of some spurious line about support and education. You would be laughed out of a court room for presenting such a weak and feeble case, is that all you’ve got??? Really??

You have also proved my earlier point about religious relativity in that Islam gets lumped in with Christianity and Judaism, when it should be treated differently and has a far more sinister side

The Law's picture

It's 2012 and already Medhi Hasan is writing self-referential articles...surprise!

jankaas's picture

"Julia, brilliant posts as usual."

now there's an endorsement worth its weight. on the same wavelength as Buckskins lol.

"How anyone could follow the teachings of a pedophile and rapist is beyond me, but they manage."

as do you since you are a Christian you dim-bulb. Mary was about 13 when she was impregnated by God (statutory rape anyone?)

"Isn't that right Al Jackass."

yes, it's always a pleasure to rub your nose in your dirty muck SucksDicks...

jankaas's picture

"@Jackass, your an Idiot, there is no saving you, I can’t be arsed."

coming from you ScrewYoulia Harris, i take that as a compliment. you wouldn't recognise a reasoned argument if it bit you on the arse.

Sir Michael's picture

Myself, as an unapologetic leftie, and someone who thinks that Rick Santorum is a fruitloop who should never be in any position of power, let me use this opportunity to tell you that you pulled an absolute dick move with that post Hasan.

Really.

The guy has a personal tragedy. He and his family dealt with it

The sort of demonization and false equivalence the likes of Fox news and the Daily Mail make against the left was done by you Hasan. Your punditry decended into bigotry and intolerance with that blog post. And this is Rick Santorum we are talking about, it's not as if you couldn't find actual politics from him which you could have used as a number 8 is it?

3 things everyone now knows about Mehdi Hasan;

1) He reserves his right to pass judgement on others for their own beliefs and personal lives, yet complains when he is himself judged...

http://www.newstatesman.com/religion/2011/12/violence-faith-violent-arab

2) He is happy to make a ten point blog post "just pointing things out" and not passing judgement, but will react very childishly when someone else "just points out" that the entire thing wasn't journalism but a high-handed hack job which would give the Daily Express a run for their money, albeit on the opposite side of the coin.

3) Rather than simply apologising for an error of judgement concerning his reporting the death of a child, he will then go on to make a further blog post going into even more intimate details concerning this death in a bizarre effort to convince people of his journalistic integrity.

By the way Hasan, don't you dare complain about this post. I am just "pointing things out".

praha7's picture

@john woods
RE: Can you imagine headline that read "Indulgence of Judaism is harming society"?

Pop across to Al Haaretz and you will often find headlines in this vein and often for some of the raesons you list in your comment.

Des Demona's picture

@Jankaas

Fine words Jankaas which one can only agree with. At the same time however, we live in the real world. The world in which Mehdi Hasan is (in my view) rightly berated for his hugely misjudged and insensitive attack on the way someone grieves for their child. It's his right to say it. That is free speech yes? Is it common sense. No.

This could have been an interesting thread. This could have been about press ethics, a journalists responsibility to both present news and keep a moral balance (wherever that balance is) Instead we get the usual Muslim or Antiu-muslim propoganda spwewing out, which personally I find rather depressing. i know you and the likes of Julia Harris, and the rest of the alter egos Buckskins etc like to bang on about this at length, but I find it tiresome and that is my right to free speech!

john woods's picture

@Praha7

Yes, but I don't live in Israel. I live in the UK and I would like to keep it looking vaguely like the UK, not turned into an Islamic republic.

Where is Anders Breivik when you need him?

Buckskins's picture

@Fraziel1.

All you do is run your mouth and say nothing of substance. If childish personal attacks is all you are capable of I sincerely hope it purges some of the bile from your system.

Who knows perhaps one day you also can vote for your country's leader, and have a Parliament that is not in place in part as a result of appointments and right of birth. If we Americans elect a President that irks the hell out of your ilk, then we know we did something right.

Julia Harris's picture

“10 Things you didn’t know about Mehdi Hassan....”
Point 8 – He defends Islam and promotes Islamic values which includes Sharia law which promotes the stoning of adulterers, execution of apostates and blasphemers, repression of other religions, and a mandatory hostility toward non-Islamic nations.

jankaas's picture

@Des

"Fine words Jankaas which one can only agree with."

great, i thought as much.

" That is free speech yes? Is it common sense. No."

indeed. and i said so right at the start of this thread. pls scroll to the top, mine was the 5th comment.

you then lob me in the same boat as certain vile reactionaries. i protest. i don't defend or attack Islam for my personal agenda, beyond the desire to deal in facts. others dish out hysterical rhetoric, and propaganda, i most certainly don't. i thought my post 12 January 2012 at 15:20 laid out my position quite clearly?

the fact that i use some foul language when dealing with Julia and Buckskins is merely because they solicit this from me. i think they crave and demand it. but as you may have noticed, my interactions with reasonable persons don't include any bad language at all.

ttfn

Buckskins's picture

Jackass. I will not dignify your post with a rebuttal.

Buckskins's picture

Jackass, Julia needs no defending from me or anyone else. The fact that she persistently kicks your ass all over the place, to the delight of some of us, is no reason to attack her in your laughable macho manner.

You see Julia like many women is very smart. When you duel with her you're bringing a knife to a gun fight. Did you figure you could stone her into submission with your fantasy world intellectual cleverness. She makes you look even more stupid than you are. Quite an accomplishment.

Buckskins's picture

Julia, you're brilliant sweetie.

@)-)-)----

Julia Harris's picture

"as you may have noticed by now, Julia hasn't bothered to defend herself. this is also part and parcel of her 'debating' style; get out the moment your bluff is called- like most bigots, she too is a coward."

Jackass, your cutting remarks are too much for me, your new band of merry men, Andy G, Sir Michael are a really scary prospect, your wit is really something to behold...

Fact is, I have a life (unlike you?) and have had an enjoyable weekend with friends and family and don’t feel any urgency to justify myself, especially to an Idiot like you.

“just say that Islam is not bad by default, and that you definitely do not mean to imply that Muslim = bad.”

Look Jackass,I know you have a simple mind and like things simple, but its not for me to say whether Islam is good or bad by default. All I know is what I see, read and hear about the deeds and actions of Muslims who adhere to Islam and Sharia - its definitely not all good and its alot of very bad too.

I have no doubt not all Muslims are bad people and I would surmise that its the ones who are lapsed and more secular that have a better chance of being model citizens.

I would also say that Muslims who adhere to and are pro Sharia are not the sort of people I would want to live with.

Lets not sugar coat things here for the sake of keeping the PC brigade happy, Islam is not a religion of peace, it’s a totalitarian ideology that lacks human rights, proper justice and causes many Muslims to be hateful and prejudicial towards non-Muslims, homosexuals and women.

It also causes them to persecute others inline with Islamically inspired killing, acts of terror and violence – all on a daily basis.

If that’s the default position or not shouldn't make any difference, it won’t change my feelings and/or shouldnt anyone else's. It should just let people think, these are terrible things happening in the name of Islam, lets try to work together to save the innocent people downgraded by this nightmarish religion, so that they might be free and live a happy life, free of fear and intimidation.

I know....tho Jackass, Sir Michael and AndyG that you still won’t concede to my view, but instead decide to hate me for bringing the truth to you. You will never concede; "I can see what you mean, as a Muslim I am embarrassed, ashamed and disgusted by my religion Islam. I want it reformed and modernised without reservation.

I am able to say that as a Muslim who can see good from bad, right from wrong. I am able to say this as a Muslim who has tasted the fruits of freedom in the West - whereby I can be truthful and critical of Islam, unlike Muslims in Islamic states whereby it is feared and revered without question, totalitarianism.

Buckskins's picture

Fraziel1.

That would be why we Americans have run the world for the last century. It would also be why you Brits are our lap dogs. So you don't like us? You obviously have us confused with a country than could give a rats ass.

andyg's picture

Mehdi your making thing's worse my friend. You did it, you wrote it now live with it and move on. The worse thing you can do is try to explain why, just move on!

Des Demona's picture

@Jankaas

I agree I have always found you perfectly reasonable, my apologies if it seemed otherwise. What I was talking about was how so many threads here get derailed by the religious intolerance or weird conversations about sod all which drone on forever between - and here I think you'll find it hard to disagree - certain posters ( I use the plural loosely as I suspect many of them are the same)

So I'll tell you what Jankaas, how about you and I make a pact. We both avoid interaction with the obvious trolls and vile bigots who frequent these forums and if everyone else does likewise we might actually isolate them and make this place a decent forum for intelligent debate?

jankaas's picture

"Jackass"

yes ScrewYoulia..?

"ROFL"
how embarrassing for you.

"(from somewhere and out of context)"

nope. i provided the name of their study, and the context i explained also.

"it doesn’t make your case that the statistical data I/they presented is contradictory and worthless. "

no you dimwit, that's exactly what i did not do. i did however illustrate that the data does not allow you to imagine it supports your notion that Muslims=bad.

that you can't even see this simple truism is indicative of just how dense you are. that Buckskins is impressed by your arguments should set alarm bells ringing at max volume.

jankaas's picture

"Jackass, your cutting remarks are too much for me"

do be brave ScrewYoulia, no tears now...

"Fact is, I have a life (unlike you?)"

i can multi-task, unlike you? it honestly doesn't take but a moment to sort you out dear. still managed to cook sunday roast for wife and kids, help with their homework, hoover, make some music, read a little.....

"its not for me to say whether Islam is good or bad by default."

rubbish. that is exactly the question put to you. i say Islam is not bad by default, nor is Islam good by default. it's just another religion, they're all a load of old toot as far as i'm concerned. it's what people do with them that is key.

you however are driven to obscene generalisation, and insist that Islam is an imminent danger to our Western way of life. but at least you do now acknowledge it is just down to your personal prejudice since you write;

"I have no doubt not all Muslims are bad people and I would surmise that its the ones who are lapsed and more secular that have a better chance of being model citizens."

that's not too bad though, maybe there's hope for you? indeed the more modernisation the better, the more humility the better.

btw the end of your post is most confusing without the quotes closing, nor do i get which person you wrote it in when you write "as a Muslim I am.."

none of the people you list nor me, are Muslim as far as i'm aware, nor are you. so what's with the amateur dramatics?

jankaas's picture

"Jackass"

yes ButtFucks..?

"I will not dignify your post with a rebuttal."

you couldn't in other words. coward.

Latest tweets