A rouger shade of Palin
Those who seek to satirise Sarah, we salute you!
By Tom Calvocoressi Published 20 November 2009 12:35
As the Scary Sarah Palin Show rolls into a town near you (if you live in Grand Rapids, Michigan, that is), with the former Alaskan governor, failed Republican VP candidate and inveterate "hockey mom" signing copies of her autobiography Going Rogue: an American Life, it seems timely to pay tribute to all those satirists and lefties who continue to succeed in undermining her. While cheering crowds of fellow American "patriots" greeted a red-blazered and as-ever gung-ho Palin with a roar as she descended from her battle(axe) bus, the anti-Palin book industry was preparing its national lampoon.
First up, over in New York, editors from our friends the Nation simultaneously published their subversion of the Palin autobiography, ingeniously entitled Going Rouge: Sarah Palin -- an American Nightmare, the title apparently inspired by a genuine spoonerism made by a US newsreader. The font and graphics brilliantly echo the HarperCollins official book -- how many diehard Palinettes will mistakenly pick up a copy of the collection of leftist essays at their nearest Barnes & Noble? We can but hope . . .
As the publishers OR Books say, however, this is not a spoof book, but a collection of serious essays by respected writers to provide a political counterpoint to Palin and "the nightmarish prospect of her continuing to dominate the nation's political scene". In the words of Richard Kim, the editor of the Nation:
The cover is a parody of hers and it certainly takes some shots and mocks Sarah Palin, but it is a very serious book and the book itself is not a parody. It is not at all intended as a joke or a parody.
Rather more lighthearted is another Going Rouge, this one a "colouring and activity" book, its title again inspired by the hapless local newsreader. (Can anyone tell me who? I read the story last week but now can't find it!) Again hitting shelves on 17 November, the same day as Rogue, here you can "dress Sarah for success" or "help Sarah find her way to the White House". From their website:
Yeah, yeah, we heard all about the Sarah Palin's Book Going Rogue: an American Life to be launched on Nov 17th. They expect to move 1.5 million copies, and pre-orders have been brisk. We couldn't let that stand without a fight. There are two sides to every story, but let's get something clear here -- Sarah didn't write this book either.
Then, let's not forget the excellence of Tina Fey's campy and uncanny impersonations of Palin on Saturday Night Live last year, which won her an Emmy and, it may not be an exaggeration to say, were instrumental in ensuring a Republican loss (if not the actual Obama win). Fey is said to be reprising her role as Palin to coincide with the autobiography's release.
Finally -- to those readers of a more sensitive disposition, don't click this link. No, don't, you won't like it. Don't click it. Don't. Click. This. Link. Oops, oh well, I did warn you! -- dare I just mention Hustler's inspired porno flick Who's Nailin' Paylin? Adventures of a Hockey MILF, featuring "actors" spoofing Hillary Clinton, Condi Rice, Todd Palin and, yes, Mrs P herself . . . ?
Rouge faces all round.
Latest tweets
More from New Statesman
- Online writers:
- Steven Baxter
- Rowenna Davis
- David Allen Green
- Mehdi Hasan
- Nelson Jones
- Gavin Kelly
- Helen Lewis
- Laurie Penny
- The V Spot
- Alex Hern
- Martha Gill
- Alan White
- Samira Shackle
- Alex Andreou
- Nicky Woolf in America
- Bim Adewunmi
- Glosswitch
- Kate Mossman on pop
- Ryan Gilbey on Film
- Martin Robbins
- Rafael Behr
- Eleanor Margolis
- Tools and services:
- Polls
- Predictions
- Archive
- Magazine
- PDF edition
- RSS feeds
- Advertising
- Subscribe
- Special supplements
- Stockists





















13 comments
I don't think anyone needs to satirise palin - she's already a joke.
She reminds me of Martin Sheen's character in the Dead Zone movie.
"Now, what colour is the red button, again?"
I don't like Palin and my views are pretty much the exact opposite of hers, but I have to say that most of what is written about her is a load of b*ll**ks.
If you follow up most of the coverage, its mainly hearsay and gossip with little foundation.
As far as I can see she is a competent politician with a track record of success, who was flung late into the presidential race and failed to find her feet through a combination of poor briefing and media hostility.
She is a real contender for 2012 - youngish, good looking, pleasant, perceptively an ordinary woman with a family and a career. I can't for the life of me understand why so many on the left fail to understand her appeal.
Don't you realise with this breathtaking vitriol you aim at her you are effectively telling American working women that they are beneath contempt? That someone they see as being very like themselves is fit for nothing but the kitchen, and, if good looking enough, to fuel "ironic" fantasies?
If I didn't know better I'd swear you were all working towards her election.
She's like Pauline Hanson (look her up) on steroids.
Such a wonderful conversation with the elites...and BTW.. perhaps Obama should have someone else BS for him in his book ..maybe just maybe his book sales could have being a bit closer than Palin... Liberalism is a lost cause. They (liberals) are condesanding and annoying when anyone disagree with their point. Just a though ..From an ex liberal..
crazy ideology...
I 100% agree javmo liberalism is a lost cause!! Neo-liberalism and realism have been tryed tested and ultimatly failed...The unrestricted free market and privatisation of the 80s thatcher and reagan governements flower did not blossom...but lead to economic meltdown...Its time for the the U,S to go left...O'bama is maybe starting to shuffle in the right direction but a shuffle is not needed ...he has to 2 footedly jump. Palin refusing to teach darwins evolution theory deary me the more signs of republican insanity, next they will be denying healthcare to people because they cant afford it.....
I'm confused. I mean, I get that I'm obviously not as clever as you guys - if I were as searingly witty and smart I guess I'd be a lefty - but how come you think it's funny that someone used Mrs Palin as the basis for a porno? I guess you can hate Sarah Palin all you want (although the level of vitriol rather begs the question - just who is allowing her to sustain her 'her continuing to dominate the nation's political scene') but this is a pron movie like any other in that it exploits women's bodies for the sexual gratification of paying customers - essentially prostitution 2.0.
I know you guys consider yourselves sophisticated, liberal metropolitan types so I'd have thought you'd be a bit more grown up than using sexual exploitation as a punch line.
He can't be that clever - he doesn't seem to know what a spoonerism is.
You're right -- it's not strictly speaking a spoonerism, more a slip of the tongue. But I like the word, so sue me!
Yeah, yeah, I know a "pornification" of anyone's life -- even Palin -- is in slightly questionable taste (and we at the Statesman wouldn't seek to endorse exploitation), but it's still kinda funny. Now ain't it?
Not 'strictly speaking' a spoonerism? Well not in any way, actually.
But, you're absolutely right ModerateRepublican, it is because you're not witty or smart that you're a Republican. Congratulations on the insight.
"but it's still kinda funny. Now ain't it?"
At the risk of sounding a humourless Puritan, "Errrrr.... NO! Not really."
You do.
I somehow don't like all the Palin reviews. the book is ghost written and shouldn't get even an iota of attention that it is getting. At least Obama wrote his own stuff.
People, people.... please use a dictionary. what does it mean to "beg the question"?
That's my argument: finish school.