Support 100 years of independent journalism.

The anti-abortion conservatives pretend that the change they long fought for won’t change much

Right-wing commentators and politicians are seeking to downplay the potential impact of overruling Roe vs Wade.

By Emily Tamkin

WASHINGTON DC – On Monday 2 May, a draft Supreme Court decision was leaked. The decision would effectively overturn Roe vs Wade, the 1973 case that guaranteed a right to an abortion federally. ​​​​If that landmark ruling is overturned, abortion would be legally restricted in roughly half of the states in the US. In some states, access to certain forms of birth control, such as IUDs, would be restricted too, as would IVF. Some people who had miscarriages have already, long before this week, found themselves hounded by prosecutors; that will continue and likely intensify. 

For anti-abortion activists, this decision, if it goes ahead, would be the culmination of decades of work. For millions of people, it would be a nightmare, and it is not an exaggeration to say that, since abortions in some cases are necessary to save the life of the pregnant person, the ostensibly “pro-life” decision will, for some, end in death. And so it was interesting to see people who wanted this outcome, and indeed who championed and worked towards it, downplay what it would mean.

The Senate minority leader, Mitch McConnell — who ensured a conservative Supreme Court by denying president Barack Obama’s nomination a hearing in the final year of his presidency, but later pushed through president Donald Trump’s pick with just days to go before the 2020 election — said he wanted to focus on the leak, not the substance of the document. “If Roe is indeed rolled back, you’re not going to have this massive change in law,” Kayleigh McEnany, Trump’s former White House press secretary, said on Fox News. The Fox News co-host, Tomi Lahren, said Democrats would be “counting on low-information viewers and voters who are going to look at this and say abortion is now outlawed” (which indeed it will be in many parts of the country). Various Republican senators said that they would rather focus on the economy (never mind that reproductive choice and the economy are, for the people making — or denied — the choice, inextricably linked). 

Why would conservatives downplay the effects of something that they’ve been working towards for years? Perhaps because the majority of the country does not support overturning Roe. Perhaps it’s because support for abortion has increased, not decreased, since Roe’s passage. Perhaps because they do not want to discuss the ways in which the draft decision blurs the separation of church and state, denying millions whose faiths do not restrict the right to an abortion their own religious liberty in the process. 

Perhaps, however, elected Democrats, many of whom seem to mostly be telling Americans to vote in November, are overly confident that this will galvanise their supporters. There are months between when the formal Supreme Court decision is expected and the midterm elections.

And so Americans are left with an additional indignity: their rights are attacked in a way that will cause real harm, and all the while we are told not to worry. The pain won’t even hurt. 

[See also: Roe vs Wade: What to write when your country takes away your rights?]

Content from our partners
The truth about employability
Why we need a Minister for Citizen Experience
Look at the person, not the CV
Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Topics in this article : , ,