Support 110 years of independent journalism.

Republicans want to destroy the US presidential debates

That may not seem like a great loss, but the opportunity for public scrutiny of policy ideas would be lost.

By Emily Tamkin

WASHINGTON DC – On 14 April, the Republican National Committee (RNC) voted to withdraw its participation from the Commission on Presidential Debates. The Commission on Presidential Debates is, as its name suggests, the entity that governs presidential debates in the general election.

The RNC insisted that it does not mean it has completely pulled future nominees from debates. Still, with the RNC chairwoman Ronna McDaniel insisting that the commission is “biased and has refused to enact simple and common-sense reforms”, and generally echoing the former president Donald Trump’s criticisms of the fairness of the commission, it is perhaps safe to assume that, at the very least, Republican participation in future presidential debates will not be a given.

In practical terms, this is perhaps no great loss. The presidential debates from the 2020 election featured Trump yelling over everyone for the entirety of the opener. In a later debate, Trump spewed internet conspiracy theories about his political opponent, Joe Biden, and Biden’s son Hunter. In the 2016 iterations, Trump stalked his opponent Hillary Clinton around the stage; he also invited women who had accused her husband, Bill Clinton, of sexual harassment at various points to the debates as his guests. In other words, they have already turned into a substance-less circus. I do not know if there are still people who tune into the debates to hear how their candidates’ policies hold up under questioning, rather than root for their party’s pick, but if there are they have surely been disappointed in recent years. Not having a presidential debate in 2024 doesn’t seem like such a great loss.

​And yet, it is. There should be a forum for candidates to have their ideas scrutinised and held to account, and to answer both to their political rivals and opponents and the American public. It would be nice if both of the US’s major political parties recognised that and did what they could to make their candidates answerable to the people in this way, rather than, as the RNC is, making mendacious excuses and pulling further and further away from transparency and accountability.

In other words, it’s not that the RNC pulling out of the Commission on Presidential Debates is a great loss. Rather, the RNC decision underscores what we Americans have already lost, and how difficult it will be to ever get that back.

[See also: Murder charge heralds a frightening new phase in fight for abortion]

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday - from the New Statesman. The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates. Weekly analysis of the shift to a new economy from the New Statesman's Spotlight on Policy team.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Content from our partners
Businesses must unlock the regional growth agenda
Why we must prioritise treating long-term health conditions
It’s time to reimagine the lifecycle of our devices

Topics in this article :