New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. World
  2. Americas
  3. North America
22 April 2022updated 27 Apr 2022 9:39am

Don’t be fooled: Republicans will call any Capitol riot investigation biased

Trying to hold a former president accountable will always be seen as partisan, but Donald Trump shouldn’t be ignored.

By Emily Tamkin

This week, ahead of the public hearings of the special panel of the House of Representatives that is charged with investigating the events of 6 January 2021, Jamie Raskin, a Democratic congressman on the committee, told reporters that the events did indeed constitute an attempted coup. To recap: on that day, a mob, summoned to Washington DC by the then-president Donald Trump, stormed the Capitol building to try to stop the certification of the 2020 presidential election. 

Meanwhile, the New York Times reported that, though lawmakers have sufficient evidence to make a criminal referral to the Justice Department, some are worried that this would lead the department’s own investigation efforts to be coloured as partisan. 

[See also: What is Trump’s endorsement worth?]

But there is no way that any action the Justice Department ends up taking, should it indeed decide to take action, will not be called partisan by the Republicans. The vast majority of the Republicans in the House of Representatives did not vote to impeach Trump after 6 January, and the majority of the Republicans in the Senate did not vote to convict him. American politics are such that trying to hold the former president accountable under the law will be considered partisan. That is sad. It is not, however, a reason to stop the former president being held accountable under the law.

Why? Because if you have found, as these lawmakers reportedly have, that the former president was engaged in a conspiracy to defraud the American people, then it is your job to do whatever you can to address that. Lawmakers who are not interested in that job, and who would rather be well liked by everyone, should perhaps consider getting out of politics, or at least out of Congress. 

[See also: Why is JD Vance so bad at politics?]

I understand that these legislators are afraid of appearing political. I understand that a judge in California found it “more likely than not” that Trump committed a crime, and that some might hope that that will be enough for the attorney general Merrick Garland. But by now we know two things: First, that any action will indeed be called political, and so that is not, in and of itself, an excuse for inaction. Second, that the cavalry is not coming. There will be no deus ex machina to save American democracy. That will only happen with a concerted effort from everyone in power to do quite literally anything in their power to hold Trump to account. That includes these lawmakers. 

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Content from our partners
Can green energy solutions deliver for nature and people?
"Why wouldn't you?" Joining the charge towards net zero
The road to clean power 2030