Support 100 years of independent journalism.

25 September 2018

Unite’s row with Keir Starmer exposes Labour’s Brexistential crisis

The justified fear from Len McCluskey and his union is that a referendum on the terms of Brexit could cost Labour electoral gains in the towns it needs to win.

By Patrick Maguire

 

Departing from script in his speech to Labour conference this morning, Keir Starmer won a standing ovation when he said the party was not “ruling out Remain as an option” in a hypothetical second referendum.

In doing so he has picked a fight with a powerful adversary: Unite. In the hours after the shadow Brexit secretary spoke, both Len McCluskey, the general secretary of Labour’s biggest union backer, and Steve Turner, his assistant, said any referendum would be on the terms of the deal and that Remain would not be on the ballot. 

McCluskey has made that point repeatedly in recent days. Those involved in drawing up the conference motion – a process that saw Starmer, local party delegates, and the unions hammer out a compromise motion – dispute his line of argument. A line stipulating that any public vote would be on the terms of Brexit, rather than Brexit itself, was removed during Sunday night’s compositing meeting.

Unite’s aversion to a second EU referendum that explicitly includes the option of reversing the result of the first highlights the defining anxiety of Labour’s Brexit debate. McCluskey has said that Labour’s path to a majority runs through working class communities in the North and Midlands that, by and large, voted Leave. In July he urged Corbyn to “test every policy against how it is going to play in Walsall and Wakefield, Mansfield and Middlesbrough, Glasgow and Gateshead” and not rely on gains in London to deliver a majority. 

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

Accordingly, the leader’s office is focusing its campaigning efforts on towns in England, both in its former industrial centres and on its coasts, as well as in Scotland. It is also defending slender majorities in Leave-majority seats like Dudley North, Newcastle-under-Lyme, and Ashfield in Nottinghamshire. It’s not the economy, stupid, but the towns. Sources close to Corbyn say this year’s conference is “its most direct pitch yet to people in post-industrial towns and communities” and “the millions of people who have been most directly affected by deindustrialisation and austerity”.

This is the context within which McCluskey’s aversion to including Remain on the second referendum’s ballot paper should be understood. The (justified) fear is that it would prevent Labour gains and hasten losses in places it needs to win at the next election. Instead, McCluskey told a fringe event on Sunday, the party should look to unite Leavers and Remainers after a general election rather than divide them again with another in-out referendum. It remains to be seen whether Labour will be given a choice.