Support 100 years of independent journalism.

13 November 2013

ITV’s Charlene White gets racist, sexist abuse for choosing not to wear a poppy

It is increasingly impossible for any public figure to justify their decision not to wear a poppy because of personal reasons, no matter how sensible.

By Media Mole

Next year marks the centenary of the beginning of the First World War, and perhaps it is the proximity to that anniversary that has made this year’s poppy debate feel more tense than normal. One person who has felt that acutely is ITV News presenter Charlene White, who has had some vile abuse aimed at her on social media this week for choosing not to wear a poppy.

Here’s a sample from Twitter:

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Here are some messages posted – publicly, using their real names – on the “Charlene White ITV News” Facebook page:

These are some of the tamer examples, but you can also see that some people took to defend White. Sexism and racism compounded the anger directed at White in the most extreme cases, as out of the woodwork came the weird far-right fascist types who celebrate a symbol of anti-fascist resistance.

Her response to this abuse is measured and dignified, and entirely reasonable:

I support and am patron of a number of charities and I am uncomfortable with giving one of those charities more on-screen time than others.
I prefer to be neutral and impartial on-screen so that one of those charities doesn’t feel less favoured than another.

Off-screen in my private life – it’s different.

I wear a red ribbon at the start of December for World Aids Day, a pink ribbon in October during breast cancer awareness month, a badge in April during Bowel Cancer Awareness month, and yes – a poppy on Armistice Day.

I respect and hold in high esteem those in the armed forces, both my father and my uncle have served in the RAF and the Army.
Every year I donate to the Poppy Appeal because above all else it is a charity that needs donations, so that it can continue to help support serving and ex-service men and women and their families.

The messages of “go back to where you came from” have been interesting to read, as have the “fat s–g” comments, and the repeated use of the phrase “black c–t”.

Mostly because it flies in the face of everything that millions of British men and women and those in the Commonwealth have fought for for generations, and continue to fight for: the right to choose, and the right of freedom of speech and expression.

It’s worth saying that the defences of White’s decision have been pouring in faster and in larger quantities than the insults, with many people Voltaireishly disagreeing with her decision but defending her right to do it.  Many tweets have been deleted after other users rounded on the abusers. Regardless, so-called “poppy fascism” doesn’t appear to be going anywhere soon.