Support 100 years of independent journalism.

21 September 2010

Splitting the atom? Huhne and Hughes divided on nuclear

Is Chris Huhne "fed up" with his own party's manifesto pledge on energy?

By Patrick Osgood

A small observation from the speeches at today’s Liberal Democrat conference.

Simon Hughes gave a rousing speech, in which he was quite categorical in saying he will, with his party, use “all our influence in the coalition government” to stand up “in opposition to nuclear power”. This affirmation of the party’s position on nuclear fuel was greeted with cheers from a crowd in need of a little reassurance over their role within the coalition.

Chris Huhne, the Secretary for Energy and Climate Change, didn’t get the memo. In his speech, given a few hours later, he said:

”I’m fed up with the stand-off between renewable and nuclear which means we have neither – we will have both. We will have low-carbon energy, and security of supply.”

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A weekly round-up of The New Statesman's climate, environment and sustainability content. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Which seems to undermine Hughes’s tubthumping somewhat, and contradict the party’s manifesto pledge to:

“reject a new generation of power stations; based on the evidence nuclear power is a far more expensive way of reducing carbon emissions than promoting energy conservation and renewable energy”

So, which is it to be? The dichotomy between Hughes as the voice of the party and Huhne as the voice of government could not be clearer.

Given the fudged provision on nuclear in the coalition agreement, it is easy to see why many Liberal Democrats are queasy at conjoining with the Conservatives in such a way as to guarantee the reinvigoration of nuclear power, with only the meagre sop of being excused from collective responsibility on the issue to show for it.