Support 100 years of independent journalism.

19 February 2010

The “meaning” of James Purnell’s resignation

"Politician in honest move" shock.

By James Macintyre

Like almost everyone in Westminster, I certainly cannot claim to have predicted that James Purnell would announce that he’s to stand down as an MP at the next election, as he has done today. But I can claim to be unsurprised, having rejected the cynical view that everything Purnell does — including his call this week for ideological clarity in Labour — should be seen through the prism of the party’s leadership.

In an article for the Guardian on Tuesday, I wrote:

Purnell probably knows that in the eyes of Westminster cynics he can make no intervention that isn’t interpreted as some sort of act of hostility towards Gordon Brown, if not a pitch for the leadership when and if it becomes vacant after the general election. But Purnell should be taken at his word when he expresses a desire to contribute to the thinking of “a clear ideological argument in the manifesto”, and in his hope that his resignation claim — that Brown’s leadership makes a Tory victory “more, not less” likely — is proved wrong. He should even, despite the slight sense of frustration, be believed when he says: “I’m happy where I am now.”

This is for two reasons. First, Purnell is — contrary to conventional wisdom — highly unlikely to run for the leadership. This is because he is preparing to back the near-certain candidacy of his close ally and friend David Miliband. But second, because — like Miliband — he is a much more complicated Labour figure than his vacuous “Blairite” label suggests.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Purnell has many enemies, including some on the left, as almost all the comments under my CiF piece showed. But he is nothing if not honest. His resignation last June — agree with it or not — was one of the few brave and clear acts among the many moves by the many rebels opposed to the status quo in Labour.

Content from our partners
How to create a responsible form of “buy now, pay later”
“Unions are helping improve conditions for drivers like me”
Transport is the core of levelling up

A year and a half or so ago, in the early days of Purnell being touted as a possible leader, I asked him about it and he said, again with honesty, “I’ve got a decision to make” about whether he wanted that kind of personal reassurance and scrutiny. So, in that context — and bearing in mind that, as I have said, he is preparing to back David Miliband for the leadership — his announcement today is not surprising.

Genuinely, he wants to do something else with his life. Purnell should be applauded for that, even by those cynics who can’t get their heads round his latest move.

PS: Some news reports are claiming this is a “blow” to Gordon Brown and Labour because, the theory goes, Purnell has realised the party isn’t going to win the election.

This doesn’t quite work. If Purnell was ambitious, he would have waited until Labour loses and then stood as David Miliband’s running mate, or claimed a key shadow cabinet role in opposition. Is it not just possible he is sick of Westminster, a very small world where he has spent almost all of his working life so far?

Follow the New Statesman team on Twitter.