Support 110 years of independent journalism.

“No tangible benefits”: Tory councillors give their verdict on levelling up

An exclusive New Statesman survey reveals waning support for the government’s flagship policy.

By Jonny Ball and Katharine Swindells

The results of an England-wide survey of councillors, conducted exclusively by New Statesman Spotlight, shows that at the local level elected Conservatives have no faith in the government’s ability to deliver on levelling up. Sixty-nine per cent of respondents said their areas had seen “no tangible benefit” from what was once billed as the government’s flagship agenda on regional equality, while over a third (35 per cent) described the project as “a success”.

Ahead of the local elections on 4 May, surveys were sent to every local authority in England to gauge councillors’ opinions on local government, levelling up and the highs and lows of Westminster and local politics. Full results will be published next week. Almost 700 responses (671) from individuals across the country were received, with just over a fifth (20.2 per cent) from the Conservative Party, and twice as many from Labour.

[See also: Could the local elections be a damp squib for Labour? Here’s what councillors think]


The results confirm what many have observed and interpreted as lost momentum behind the levelling-up project: 52 per cent of councillors say that commitment to regional equality has decreased since Rishi Sunak became Prime Minister. Among Conservative councillors the figure is 28 per cent.

First launched by Boris Johnson in 2019, levelling up was at first touted as a way of consolidating the Conservative vote in the Red Wall areas of northern England and the Midlands. Johnson promised to reduce the wealth, productivity, health and investment gaps between the south-east and Britain’s “left behind” regions. Plans were vague initially. Levelling up was described as an “everything and nothing policy” by a parliamentary committee, and derided as a “slogan in search of a policy” by commentators. A £4.8bn fund was established for local authorities to bid into, but regional development experts described this sum as wholly inadequate to a challenge that was comparable in scale to the stimulus needed by the East German economy post-unification (around €2trn).

Select and enter your email address Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A quick and essential guide to domestic politics from the New Statesman's Westminster team. A weekly newsletter helping you understand the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email. Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

The Levelling Up white paper, published last year, was praised in some quarters for correctly diagnosing Britain’s geographical disparity problem – one of the widest in the developed world. But its solutions were nebulous and rehashed, and included many already-announced initiatives, such as infrastructure investment, new devolution agreements, rewriting Treasury spending rules, skills and apprenticeships policy, the relocation of Whitehall offices, a plethora of existing funding pots, and reallocating and reprioritising departmental budgets away from the capital.

Treasury worries about departmental over-spend were widely seen by experts and local government officials as acting as a blockage on levelling-up investment. 

Content from our partners
How trailblazers are using smart meters to make the move to net zero
How heat network integration underpins "London's most sustainable building"
How placemaking can drive productivity in cities – with PwC

With the former Brexit negotiator David Frost calling for the government to reverse elements of the Scottish devolution settlement, the Prime Minister should take note that Whitehall’s most centralising and imperious tendencies do not go unnoticed. Our survey revealed that local Conservatives (71 per cent) widely believe that the government is in thrall to a “Whitehall knows best” mentality, and 70 per cent said local authorities could be trusted to make better decisions than Westminster’s politicians and civil servants.


The full results of our local government survey will be published online and in a Spotlight regional development supplement in next week’s New Statesman magazine.

[See also: Can the Greens sustain their gains in May’s local elections?]