Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Quickfire
11 May

Why say #FreeBritney if she’s not free to post nude photos on Instagram?

Fans only want Britney Spears free on their own terms.

By Charlotte Colombo

Less than twelve months ago Britney Spears told her story in court. In her harrowing testimony, she spoke of her lack of bodily autonomy, with the conservators who had control of much of her life refusing to let her remove her own IUD. It was because of this that millions of people campaigned to #FreeBritney.

That is, until Britney used her freedom in a way people didn’t like.

Her crime? Posting naked photos to her Instagram account. There were always going to be trolls, but most concerning is the way in which her supporters have changed their tune. “Please have a little respect for yourself and your children,” one Instagram comment reads. “Anyone else legitimately concerned?” another asks. “Starting to think those who were in control perhaps should have stayed in control,” one user said. The photos, people suggest, are at best a sign of little self-respect, and at worst proof that Britney is too mentally unwell to look after herself — which was the basis for the conservatorship.

These objections are hypocritical. Why would fans spend all this time pleading for Britney to be freed from a controlling influence, and then try to dictate her Instagram posts? That wasn’t part of the deal. Fans seem to think that Britney’s freedom is contingent on her acting in a way that they approve of; they believe they’re entitled to have a say in her life just because they campaigned for her to be free. Some of the concerns might be well-intentioned, but overwhelmingly it feels like many of Britney’s fans see her as an eternal child: a Peter Pan who is incapable of making informed choices without the guiding hands of her saviours. The problem with that is that Britney is forty years old.

And of course, there’s plain misogyny driving this all. All her life, Britney has only been able to explore and express her sexuality under the male gaze. If it wasn’t skimpy schoolgirl outfits in music videos while she was a teenager, it was tabloid magazines having a “countdown” to her eighteenth birthday, or her being slut-shamed on live television after she broke up with Justin Timberlake in the early 2000s. Media and society were supposed to have moved on from this kind of objectification. In 2022, I thought we had the understood that if a woman wants to post naked pictures on Instagram, that’s her prerogative.

It’s uglier still that so many media outlets are presenting her Instagram posts as a huge scandal, equating it to a mental health crisis. If a woman posting naked photos on Instagram of her own volition is a surefire sign that she needs to be placed under a conservatorship, as some suggest, how much have the media, and Britney’s fans, truly changed? Apart from the body-shaming, there is a fundamental resistance in letting Britney explore her sexuality in her own terms. People can’t stand the idea of Britney having the potential to evolve outside the identity her conservators and the media boxed her into so well over the last few decades.

The saddest part of this situation is that it shows how, for many, #FreeBritney was about nothing more than jumping on a trend. If fans, commentators and media outlets truly understood the significance of the movement — rather than being blindly performative — they would understand that Britney doesn’t have to be free on their terms.

Content from our partners
The cost-of-living crisis is hitting small businesses – Liz Truss must act
How industry is key for net zero
How to ensure net zero brings good growth and green jobs
Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy
THANK YOU

Topics in this article: ,