Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Quickfire
26 April 2022

In defence of the lunch break (even when working from home)

Stop assuming your boss thinks you're skiving.

By Benedict Spence

I observed a curious phenomenon recently, at lunch in central London. Diners at every table had upturned phones beside their knives. Despite the babble, one could tell, from twitching hands and nervous glances, the attention of the patrons was not entirely on the people accompanying them. The devices hummed so often that I wondered how these people had become so conditioned to not switching off that they didn’t just take the plunge and stab the phones with the cutlery.

Then I received an email and lost my train of thought.

Though some say it’s a blessing for productivity and livers everywhere that lunches are less liquid than once they were, it seems that the time spent on them has become a lot more fluid — and that fluid is being sipped away at an alarming rate. The average lunch break is now down to a mere 29 minutes, according to a survey commissioned by Branston, and even that is punctuated not with fresh courses but regular servings of emails. The survey found the problem to be even more acute among home workers, who felt the need to forgo breaks so as not to seem lazy to overbearing superiors, as though their boss would presume they were skiving if they didn’t immediately reply to messages.

A Twitter post that went viral two weeks ago (which I found on my lunch break) tried to paint modernity as a dystopia by comparing the working calendar of today to that of the average medieval serf, who apparently worked just 150 days of the year. That stat is wrong, and what extra days they had were spent in church and avoiding death. But at least the peasants didn’t spend lunch with their lord popping his head through the hovel door every four minutes to ask how the turnip harvest was coming.

This was always going to be one of the problems of the modern world: productivity chipping away at the civilisation it built. The case for longer lunch breaks is everywhere. They allow workers decompression, to take stock of the first half of their day and reflect on how to approach the second. It helps guard against burnout, protecting against a deterioration in mental health. Improved morale and mental performance can only be beneficial. It also leads to healthier eating choices. People are more likely to take the time to choose better quality food if they know they have the time to lavish on it.

France, Spain and Italy, among others, have so normalised the extended lunch break that many of their shops don’t reopen in the afternoon. Though Montesquieu said lunchtime in Paris killed half the city, and dinner the other half, France has not yet collapsed into failed statehood. Italy’s economy isn’t as dynamic as the UK’s, but its people sure do live longer.

No one believes all problems can be solved by not working, but we know how much better we feel when rested, without the cortisol building up in our systems. Take it from me: I wrote this having not yet taken a lunch break today. Imagine how much wittier it might have been if I had.

Content from our partners
The truth about employability
Why we need a Minister for Citizen Experience
Look at the person, not the CV
Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Topics in this article : ,