New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
18 September 2024

Why Keir Starmer’s freebies have become a political problem

The Prime Minister’s past attacks on the Tories and winter fuel payment cuts have exposed his government to greater scrutiny.

By George Eaton

In politics, there are few deadlier charges than that of hypocrisy. It’s one that Labour is facing as Keir Starmer’s fondness for freebies comes under scrutiny. 

The story began with the revelation that the Prime Minister failed to declare £5,000 of clothes donated to his wife by the Labour peer and fixer Waheed Alli. Starmer – who assailed Boris Johnson over “wallpapergate” in the Commons in 2021 – has insisted that his team “reached out proactively” to the parliamentary authorities (the parliamentary standards commissioner has rejected Conservative demands to open an investigation). 

But attention has now turned to Starmer’s long-running enjoyment of hospitality. The Guardian calculates that he has now declared £100,000 worth of free tickets and gifts – clothing, glasses, Arsenal, Taylor Swift, Coldplay – more than any other major party leader in recent times. 

It’s wrong, as some commentators have, to describe this as a “scandal”. First, there is no suggestion that any rules were broken. Second, there is no evidence that any improper influence was sought or received by donors. (Johnson, by contrast, failed both of these tests.)

But this doesn’t mean there isn’t a political problem for Labour. The first issue, as I noted, is that of hypocrisy: when a leader’s actions conflict with their chosen image. Think of the ridicule heaped on the eco-friendly David Cameron in 2006 after it was revealed that a car followed behind him with his briefcase when he cycled to work. 

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

As opposition leader, Starmer delighted in challenging Rishi Sunak over his wife’s former non-dom status and his fondness for private jets. The government made much of its recent decision to cancel a £40m VIP helicopter contract used by the former prime minister. This is all well and good, but it naturally prompts greater scrutiny of Starmer’s own financial affairs.

The second issue is austerity (one reason the Labour leader’s attacks on his Conservative opponents often resonated). A government imposing tax rises or spending cuts will always be vulnerable to the charge that it’s living the high life. That applies to Labour now as it removes winter fuel payments from all but the poorest pensioners. “He’s taking £300 off pensioners and taking £76,000 of freebies,” declared Sky News’s Kay Burley to immigration minister Angela Eagle yesterday. 

We know that the government didn’t carry out an impact assessment of the winter fuel cuts. But what some in Labour are asking is whether it did a political impact assessment. Cuts to benefits – emotive and easily understood – will always have spill-over effects. While some of George Osborne’s austerity measures were highly popular (such as the two-child benefit limit), the removal of winter fuel payments is a relatively unpopular one. 

It all adds to the sense that this government is struggling to tell a positive story about itself. There has been no shortage of policy activity: planning reform, the launch of GB Energy, public ownership of the railways and buses, workers’ rights and the settling of the public sector pay disputes. But what is the project that all of this collectively amounts to? Explaining that is one of the defining tasks for Labour at its conference.

In my interview with Wes Streeting – one of Labour’s best communicators – he says of the Conservatives: “It feels like being the fire brigade hosing down the house while the arsonists are heckling you for not doing a good enough job.”

It’s a good line and one that Labour would be wise to make greater use of. But as the party is learning, one of the biggest challenges in government is avoiding setting fire to yourself.

This piece first appeared in the Morning Call newsletter; receive it every morning by subscribing on Substack here.

[See also: Wes Streeting: “I don’t want to be the fun police”]

Content from our partners
Homes for all: how can Labour shape the future of UK housing?
The UK’s skills shortfall is undermining growth
<strong>What kind of tax reforms would stimulate growth?</strong>

Topics in this article : ,