Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
9 November 2022

Letter of the week: What Britain has lost

Write to letters@newstatesman.co.uk to have your thoughts voiced in the New Statesman magazine.

By New Statesman

Consciously or unconsciously echoing Tony Benn, William Waldegrave correctly identifies “non-Marxist socialism based on Methodism and the cooperative movement” as driving “much of the rise of the Labour Party” (Cover Story, 4 November). He neglects to mention that institutionally Labour drew its strength and development from the trade unions, which have not only bankrolled the party but historically nurtured and provided some outstanding politicians, such as Ernest Bevin and James Callaghan. Trade unions were ignored as critical components of civil society in David Cameron’s “Big Society”, which was supposedly inspired by the Burkean tradition, where the “little platoons” sustained social cohesion and stability and provided a crucial buffer against the predation of an overbearing state.

Waldegrave, correctly in my view, also laments the loss of the paternalistic tradition exemplified by the likes of Rab Butler, Harold Macmillan and, for all his flaws, Edward Heath. The prospect of “the rougher beast” taking their place fills many of us with considerable foreboding.
Paul Thomson, Mobberley, Cheshire

The past-it party

Last week’s NS (4 November) has a cover story about right-wing politics by a history professor, and a second by William Waldegrave, an ex-Conservative cabinet minister, also mainly about Conservative policies. One could be excused for thinking that there is no opposition party in the UK. Surely it is time to hear from the Labour Party about its policies. As Andrew Marr points out (Politics, 4 November), they need to present an alternative vision.
Mary Davies, Lymington, Hampshire

William Waldegrave’s eulogy makes it clear that the Tories need a long vacation in opposition. At least a generation. Preferably a century.
Ian Fraser, Harrogate, North Yorkshire

Doesn’t add up

It is disappointing to read Wes Streeting in your Spotlight supplement on healthcare (28 October) bandying about uncosted claims for increased expenditure, all paid for by “abolishing the non-dom tax status enjoyed by a privileged few”.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Those who currently enjoy this tax break are unlikely to be entirely passive if it is abolished. The UK’s tax regime is, in this respect, no more generous than that of many of our neighbours. Some would leave for more congenial territories – with a net disbenefit to the UK economy. Streeting needs to show the gross cost of additional doctors, nurses, midwives, health visitors set against the net impact to the UK Exchequer of the non-dom tax changes.
Richard Budden, Tisbury, Wiltshire

The invisible “an”

Colin Kidd quotes the expression “the invisible hand” in his attempt to debunk the myth that Adam Smith was the founder of the free market (The Critics, 4 November). The problem with this fetishised expression is, however, even more severe than is recognised: Smith did not say it. In The Wealth of Nations he spoke of “an” invisible hand, not “the”. The difference is profound. “The” implies a godlike force, endowed with strategy, power and order; “an” implies something much more accidental, random and out of control. I wonder whose invisible hand first misquoted it?
Dr Valerie Hamilton, Kent

Content from our partners
What are the green skills of the future?
A global hub for content producers, gaming and entertainment companies in Abu Dhabi
Insurance: finding sustainable growth in stormy markets

Get him out of here

John Gray’s argument that proportional representation is now “an unavoidable necessity” (State of Disorder, 28 October) is further boosted by Matt Hancock appearing on a TV show while still receiving his parliamentary salary. I have lived in Suffolk for nearly 40 years, and at every general election my vote counts for nothing.
Graham Judge, Barrow, Suffolk

Clarity on dangerous dogs

Will Dunn’s article “Why would anyone lobby on behalf of dangerous dogs?” (NS online, October 2022) presented an ill-informed view of the animal welfare sector’s stance. We have been deeply shocked by the tragic events this year but strongly believe that the current approach is not fit for purpose.

Aggression in dogs is a complicated behaviour. It is not simply a product of breed. The Dangerous Dogs Act suggests only four types of dogs are dangerous and distracts from the truth: that the behaviour of any dog is determined by how they are bred, trained, socialised and treated.
The Dog Control Coalition: Battersea, Blue Cross, British Veterinary Association, Dogs Trust, Kennel Club, RSPCA and Scottish SPCA

Cold comfort

Nicholas Lezard (Down and Out, 4 November) writes: “You know what else, though, is good at keeping out the cold? A clear, golden, alcoholic liquid made in Scotland.” Sad to say, Nicholas is not right. Alcohol dilates the blood vessels close to the surface of the skin, which makes the body lose heat more quickly.
Richard Dargan, Coulsdon, Surrey

The greatest

Andy Leslie (Correspondence, 4 November) mentions the truly great British football managers but omits arguably the greatest of them all: Bob Paisley.
Ian Hartgroves, Stourbridge, West Midlands

@carysroberts
Carys Roberts, executive director of the Institute for Public Policy Research 
In 2020 @IPPR sent a letter to the BBC asking them to reconsider their coverage of fiscal events, especially inappropriate use of household analogies. This excellent piece describes the subsequent review of reporting on tax and public spending.
Inside the BBC reckoning over its economic coverage”, Anoosh Chakelian, 1 November 

@simonmontefiore
Simon Sebag Montefiore, historian
This is a good article on Holocaust kitsch fiction. Don’t agree with everything in it, but much of it. And Ann Manov is right on this: The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas should never be used to teach the history of the Holocaust.
The moral corruption of Holocaust fiction”, Ann Manov, 17 October

Write to letters@newstatesman.co.uk
We reserve the right to edit letters

[See also: Letter of the week: Time for a change]

Topics in this article:

This article appears in the 09 Nov 2022 issue of the New Statesman, On the brink