Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
22 October 2018updated 08 Jul 2021 11:47am

Why Labour hasn’t really shifted on a second referendum

By Patrick Maguire

Labour is to back a second referendum on any Brexit deal negotiated with Brussels, Jeremy Corbyn has told the shadow cabinet. 

In comments that mark the first time the Labour leader has unequivocally endorsed a fresh vote, Corbyn said that the party’s position was now “to demand that any deal is put to a public vote”. 

Until now, Corbyn has always caveated his support for a second referendum with the assertion that voters could be given a say via a general election – a form of words he stuck to in the immediate aftermath of the European elections, despite Labour’s poor third place and dissent from loyal shadow cabinet ministers, most notably John McDonnell. 

Yet it is not the unambiguous endorsement of Remain some in Westminster had expected. Corbyn told the shadow cabinet this afternoon:

“We have committed to respecting the result of the referendum, and have strongly made the case for an alternative plan for Brexit as the only serious deal that could potentially command the support of the House.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

“At Conference last year we passed our policy, the members’ policy. Over the past nine months, I have stuck faithfully to it. 

“A no-deal Brexit would plunge us into the worst excesses of disaster capitalism and trash our economy on the back of fantasy Tory trade deals or worse, very real and very damaging trade deals with Donald Trump, opening up our NHS to American companies.

“I have already made the case on the media and in Dublin, that it is now right to demand that any deal is put to a public vote. That is in line with our conference policy which agreed a public vote would be an option.

Content from our partners
Executing business ideas is easier than ever, and it’s going to kill a lot of companies
Creating an industrial strategy fit for purpose
“A third runway at Heathrow is not a silver bullet”

“A ballot paper would need to contain real choices for both leave and remain voters. This will of course depend on Parliament.

“I want to hear your views, I will be hearing trade union views next week, and then I want to set out our views to the public.”

Notably, Corbyn’s words fall some distance short of the shift to an explicitly pro-Remain position demanded by Tom Watson and Keir Starmer. It is also worth noting that Corbyn, who previously advocated a new public vote as a means to stop no-deal or a “damaging Tory Brexit”, told Labour MPs last month that he supported the principle of a vote on any deal. As such, the policy position itself is not new. 

So in so far as today’s statement represents a shift, it is a modest and rhetorical one. The only real concession Corbyn has made to Remainers in the shadow cabinet and PLP is that he has stopped suggesting a general election could resolve the impasse. And as he stressed, any real movement – both on the precise question posed in a second referendum and Labour’s campaigning – will be subject to bitter and protracted litigation within the shadow cabinet and among union leaders.

Though opponents of a new poll are on the back foot, they are not without ammunition: the shadow cabinet has also been warned that an explicitly anti-Brexit position might not be enough to win back sufficient numbers of Remainers to offset the risk of losing Leave voters in the key marginals in the North and Midlands the party must hold and win to have any chance of winning the next election. 

As much as the tide has turned in favour of Labour’s Remain tendency, it is unlikely to get the answer it wants this side of the Conservative leadership election – and there is no guarantee it will get the answer it wants at all.