Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. UK Politics
5 October 2017

Why Theresa May has failed to offer more than policy tinkering

The Conservatives are constrained by ideology, the public finances and Brexit. 

By George Eaton

Even had Theresa May’s speech been a feat of oratory, it would have been underwhelming. Faced with the greatest challenge of her political career, the Prime Minister offered mere tinkering: 25,000 new affordable homes, a potential cap on energy prices (set by Ofgem) and a freeze in university tuition fees (at £9,250).

The speech provided neither the message nor the policies that the Conservatives need to regain the initiative. They cannot simultaneously denounce Jeremy Corbyn as a “Marxist” while offering lukewarm versions of his proposals. 

But there are crucial reasons for the party’s inertia. One is ideological. After decades in which they have championed economic liberalism, the Tories are struggling to adjust to a new era in which the market is not working for the majority.

May’s electoral humbling has further limited the space for her to break with Thatcherite dogma. Most Conservative MPs continue to believe that salvation lies in the market, rather than the state. Few are prepared to think the unthinkable (such as raising taxes on the wealthy).

Since leaving No10, May’s former co-chief of staff Nick Timothy has expressed his consternation at the conservatism of the Treasury and the Department for Business. 

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

The troubled state of the public finances also reduces the scope for action. As the Financial Times’s Chris Giles has revealed, two-thirds of the £26bn that Philip Hammond reserved as a “Brexit buffer” is set to be wiped out by anaemic growth. The deficit is now not due to be eliminated until at least 2025 (a decade later than promised). Both the Chancellor and May are fiscal conservatives who run shy of Keynesian solutions (such as major investment and tax cuts). 

Finally, Brexit – the greatest challenge any post-1945 government has faced – absorbs ever more of ministers’ energy and capacity. May’s speech showed her determination to be remembered for more than EU withdrawal (an outcome she campaigned against). In the heady days of 2016, she dreamt of achieving a new ideological settlement, as Attlee and Thatcher did. But the obstacles to doing so now appear insurmountable.