Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. The Staggers
8 September 2021

Why Tory MPs won’t rebel over Boris Johnson’s National Insurance hike

While there is no enthusiastic support for the health and social care proposals among Conservatives, it is at least “swallowable”.

By Ailbhe Rea

The Conservative rebellion against Boris Johnson’s national insurance hike to pay for health and social care looks likely to be a muted affair this evening. Since rumours of the plans began to break over the weekend, cabinet ministers, Conservative former chancellors and backbenchers have lined up either anonymously or off the record to indicate their unhappiness with the plan – one that goes against their Conservative low-tax instincts, a 2019 party manifesto pledge, as well as, with this choice of tax, targeting younger working people in a way they see as unfair.

But following the plan’s announcement yesterday, Conservative MPs are, reluctantly, falling into line behind it. The tricky back-bench questions for the Prime Minister when he spoke in the chamber never came, and, while some Tory MPs still plan to rebel, many who strongly hinted they would vote against the government have decided not to.

What has changed? The main thing is the Tory sense of pragmatism that has seen the party shapeshift, change leaders and directions time and again to electoral advantage. One Conservative MP says they understand that this health and social care levy is a “flagship policy” of the government – not one they can rebel on lightly without inflicting serious harm on their own brand. A cynic might also wonder if rumours of a cabinet reshuffle before Conservative Party conference – and possibly as soon as tomorrow – have helped to inspire loyalty in the Conservative ranks.

[See also: How Boris Johnson will try to bounce Tory MPs into voting for his tax rise]

There is a second factor that has influenced those on the back benches. Conservative MPs have reluctantly concluded that they will be in a weak position to ask for more money for the NHS in their constituencies if they oppose a levy designed to raise funds for it. Tory MPs are competing against each other for money from the towns fundlevelling-up fund, and for a piece of the pie in new funding for NHS hospitals. They know their negotiating hand is weakened if they rebel.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy
THANK YOU

The third factor in squeezing the rebellion is, quite simply, that Tory MPs think the Prime Minister’s plan is better than they had initially feared. The proposal was first reported over the weekend, before the government had decided the final details of the policy, leaving critics time to get ahead of the story without anyone from No 10 making the case for it. Expanding the national insurance levy to include pensioners in work has done something to allay Tory fears that this is an unfair tax on younger people, as has the dividends tax hike.

Content from our partners
How industry is key for net zero
How to ensure net zero brings good growth and green jobs
Flooding is a major risk for our homes

That has been further helped by a line in the Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS)’s snap analysis of the proposals. Although the IFS describes the package overall as “disappointing”, Tory MPs have been quick to pick up on the economics body’s description of the plans as “a broad based and broadly progressive tax increase”, which has made the plan “more palatable”, noted one MP.

There is no enthusiastic support for these proposals among Conservatives. One senior government source admits the plan is “not ideal”, while another would-be rebel admits to not being “over the moon” about it. But it is “swallowable”. They are sticking with it, and Boris Johnson looks likely to have pulled off his first political sleight of hand of the new political year.

[See also: How the tax system squeezes graduates]