Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. The Staggers
24 February 2021

Why the SNP’s opponents aren’t benefiting from the Salmond-Sturgeon feud

All the main parties have handled allegations of sexual harassment poorly.

By Stephen Bush

The inquiry into the Scottish government’s handling of allegations of sexual harassment against Alex Salmond will not hear evidence from the former first minister today, after the Scottish parliament withdrew and then republished a revised version of Salmond’s written submission, following advice from the Scottish Crown Office.

Salmond, who has offered to attend this Friday (26 February) instead, has said that he cannot appear before the committee unless his evidence is published in full. He insists that individuals within the Scottish government and the SNP planned to damage his reputation, even to the extent of sending him to prison, and has accused his successor, Nicola Sturgeon, of misleading the Scottish parliament and breaking the ministerial code. Sturgeon denies the claims. 

The ongoing dispute about the Scottish government’s handling of the charges against Salmond, who in March last year was found not guilty of 12 charges of attempted rape, sexual assault and indecent assault, and “not proven” on a further charge of sexual assault, has yet to dent the SNP’s popularity or interrupt its march to a fourth consecutive election victory. 

[see also: The Alex Salmond affair has shown Scotland at its worst]

While the party’s internal divisions are not going away, the fantasy of some of the SNP’s opponents – that the Salmond inquiry would boost their chances – has proven to be just that: a fantasy.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

For Scottish politics, the more significant event yesterday was probably Sturgeon’s unveiling of the Scottish government’s route out of lockdown, which is more cautious than the plan for England. The coronavirus crisis has allowed the First Minister to demonstrate the ways in which she is unlike Boris Johnson – she speaks in an accessible, easy-to-understand way, she largely avoids jokes and analogies, and she generally sounds more careful than the Prime Minister – even on the occasions when she hasn’t been. Since December, that tonal difference has been accompanied by a genuine policy divergence: Scotland has had a far tougher lockdown considering its caseload and it is plotting a longer journey out of it too. 

[see also: Why support for Scottish independence is more fragile than it appears]

The uncomfortable reality for the SNP’s opponents is that, whatever the truth of the Sturgeon-Salmond divisions, no party can say it handled well the wave of sexual allegations that followed the #MeToo revelations in Hollywood in 2017, whether it is Theresa May restoring the whip to Charlie Elphicke, who was later convicted of sexual assault; Labour’s unresolved sexual harassment claims; or the legitimate allegations brushed aside across the House. It is no wonder the Salmond row has not changed the political climate in Scotland.

That speaks to the real challenge before the SNP’s opponents: if they want to beat the party, they need to first demonstrate that they are a better alternative, whether through governing England well or doing a better job of handling their own internal affairs.