Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. The Staggers
16 December 2018

Westminster’s two Jeremys reveal where power really lies in the Brexit debate

The Foreign Secretary and the Labour leader command headlines, but it is their parties who really matter to the Brexit outcome. 

By Stephen Bush

Jeremy Hunt has claimed that the United Kingdom will “flourish and prosper” after a no-deal Brexit in an interview with the Telegraph while Andrew Gwynne’s appearance on The Andrew Marr Show, where he laid out Labour’s position on no confidence motions, second referendums and all that, has people talking about another Jeremy: Jeremy Corbyn, the Labour leader, and what his intentions are.

Quite sensibly, no one is interpreting Hunt’s position as some outgrowth of “the political philosophy and thought of Jeremy Hunt”. It’s all being seen for what it is: political positioning given the balance of Brexiteer and Remainer forces in the Tory party’s grassroots.

Ultimately, the only bit of the government that matter as far as the United Kingdom’s Brexit outcome are Downing Street, which ultimately controls the legislative timetable and will decide how the executive reacts to and in anticipation of lost votes in the legislature. Hunt’s interview only matters as far as the much narrower question of who ultimately replaces Theresa May is concerned – are Conservative MPs and party members buying his conversion to the ranks of no deal? The answer, from the conversations I’ve had this morning is: unfortunately for Hunt, while some of them are, not enough Leavers are buying it to compensate for Tory Remainers who now think he is a dilettante and “an empty shirt”, in the words of one.

To the extent that Jeremy Hunt “matters” in all this, it is as an avatar of the forces that could lead to a no-deal exit: that is, the sizable caucus of Brexiteer opponents of the withdrawal agreement, the hardest possible negotiated exit available to the United Kingdom, both within the Conservative parliamentary party and the Tory party grassroots.

There is a tendency to forget that the same dynamic is at work in the Labour Party too, and to interpret ever shift in Labour party policy through the lens of “the political philosophy and thought of Jeremy Corbyn”. Labour Party policy on Brexit is, and probably always will be, softer than the ideal position of Corbyn himself. Labour Party policy is primarily driven by the needs of internal party management and to keep Labour’s existing coalition on side.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

As I explain in the Sunday Times today, the Labour leadership know that at present, any concrete position on Brexit will incur political damage and their hope is that the passage of time will make the politics less painful, one way or another.

Are there committed Brexiteers with the ear of Jeremy Corbyn? Yes, of course. But there is no button in Corbyn’s office that controls the votes of Labour MPs. One vital and overlooked factor in all this is that if it looks as if a no deal exit is looming, the challenge for Corbyn won’t be securing his ideal version of Brexit, but finessing the fact that a large number of Labour MPs will, come the crunch, vote for any Brexit deal to prevent no deal. Labour supporters of another referendum know this full well which is why they are so worried about May delaying the vote on the withdrawal agreement.

If that doesn’t happen, the crucial point won’t be what Jeremy Corbyn thinks but does not say, or what Jeremy Hunt says but does not think: but the balance of forces within their parties and their coalitions in the country.