Support 100 years of independent journalism.

David Cameron admits: I had shares in offshore fund

The Prime Minister has admitted that he and his wife had shares in Panama-registered fund Blairmore.

By Stephen Bush

David Cameron has admitted that he and his wife, Samantha Cameron, had shares in his father’s offshore wealth fund, Blairmore. The Camerons invested £12,497 in 1997, and sold the stake in January 2010 – four months before Cameron became Prime Minister -for £31,500.

As the profit fell below the capital gains tax threshold, they paid no tax following the sale, though Cameron insisted in an interview with ITV News that the shares’ dividends were subject to British income tax.

In the interview, Cameron stated:

I’ve been very clear about the future. I’ve said I’m not going to benefit from any family trusts. I’ve been very clear about the present: I don’t own any shares, I don’t own any unit trusts or any investments like that. I own two homes, one of which I rent out, and I have a salary as Prime Minister”, but added. “I did own stocks and shares in the past, quite naturally, as my father was a stockbroker. I sold them all in 2010, because if I was going to become Prime Minister, I didn’t want anyone to say you’ve got other agendas or vested interests or all the rest of it.

Cameron came to the defense of his father, who died in September 2010, insisting that he was not a tax avoider, saying:

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

[A] lot of the criticisms are based on a fundamental misconception, which is that Blairmore Investment, a unit trust, was set up with the idea of avoiding tax. It wasn’t. It was set up after exchange controls went, so that people who wanted to invest in dollar-denominated shares and companies could do so, and there are many other, thousands of other unit trusts set up in this way.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

The fund, Cameron said, “wasn’t a family trust. It wasn’t for the benefit of one particular family; anyone could have bought units in it. And crucially, if you were a UK citizen and bought units in it, then you paid income tax on the dividends.”

Cameron added that he would be happy for both him and the leader of the Opposition to publish their tax returns, saying: “whether we do it, you know, every year or starting now or going back a couple of years. Whatever. I’m very happy with that.”