Energy 6 March 2019 Caroline Lucas accusing politicians of “shirking” climate debate doesn’t quite stand up The Green MP is right about the importance of climate action, but the debate was comparatively well attended. GETTY Sign UpGet the New Statesman's Morning Call email. Sign-up “Truant politicians shirk responsibility” tweeted Green MP Caroline Lucas, after only a handful of MPs turned up to last week's debate on the topic of “Net Zero Carbon Emissions: UK’s Progress” . Unforgivable that 610 MPs skipped yesterday's debate on climate change. Young people on #schoolstrike4climate are showing leadership, while truant politicians shirk responsibility. If your MP missed it, tell them why we urgently need a #GreenNewDeal to secure our futures: pic.twitter.com/MpNI4WfEFA — Caroline Lucas (@CarolineLucas) March 1, 2019 Yet while climate change is of vast importance (for the sake of humans and moles alike), her approach to raising awareness has made this mole's nose twitch. Last week’s debate was what’s known as a “Backbench Business debate”. A look at the transcript on Hansard (the official record of parliamentary debates), shows that 37 MPs spoke or intervened. And for this kind of event, 37 is a respectable number. As the Deputy Speaker herself commented at the end of the debate: “this has been such a well-subscribed and well-ordered debate this afternoon.” In contrast, just 26 people (on your mole's count) spoke in the Backbench Debate on the subject of St David’s Day, held immediately before. Furthermore, other MPs may have followed the climate debate on parliamentary TV or read the transcript later online (arguably a more time-efficient exercise, if they did not themselves intend to speak). Now perhaps 37 MPs in attendance would still be worryingly low if this really was the “first time” climate change had been debated in the last two years, as Lucas has claimed in a follow-up article for the Guardian. But another quick search of Hansard for “climate change” reveals the term has been the subject of at least three Commons debates in the last two years. And that’s not even including those, like last Thursday’s, which didn’t use the phrase in their titles. In the last two years, there have been 2,606 references to climate change made across both Houses, plus 83 relevant written statements. So the notion that MPs were “shirking” responsibility by not turning up to last week’s backbench debate appears whiffy, as some MPs have tried to point out on Twitter: The responses to this are just :( It is possible to believe climate change must be tackled AND that non-London/Brighton MPs helping constituents on one of the few days we’re allowed to is not ‘unforgivable’. When did this horrible absolutist language become part of our discourse? https://t.co/WXqKsYTwpd — Lisa Nandy (@lisanandy) March 1, 2019 All this name-calling when there's climate change to be solved seems on the petty side to this mole. Will someone please think of the kids? › Why a by-election in Peterborough is still not certain I'm a mole, innit. Subscribe For more great writing from our award-winning journalists subscribe for just £1 per month!