Support 100 years of independent journalism.

Rishi Sunak’s expectation management

Ahead of the spring statement, a Chancellor desperate to return to small-state conservatism is playing down his ability to address the cost of living crisis.

By Ailbhe Rea

While the situation in Ukraine remains dire, with all eyes on the besieged city of Mariupol, the focus in Westminster this week will be on the Chancellor’s spring statement. Rishi Sunak is under pressure to address the cost of living crisis that is squeezing people of all incomes and forcing the poorest to choose between feeding themselves and heating their homes. 

Team Rishi has been rolling the pitch for Wednesday’s statement by playing down both in public and in private how much the Chancellor is able to help. They argue the sanctions on Russia have left the British economy more exposed than the public has yet realised, and that there is a limited amount the Treasury can do to mitigate the pain. The Chancellor’s big worry is that the economic support he provided during the pandemic has given people unrealistic expectations of what measures he can and can’t take to shield people from an economic crisis caused by global inflationary pressures and international challenges. 

[see also: How phasing out Russian oil could deepen the cost-of-living crisis]

The measures Sunak will announce on Wednesday (23 March) – an expected cut to fuel duty and an increase of the threshold at which people pay National Insurance – are further than he wanted to go, and not far enough for Labour. The opposition believes it is Sunak’s choice not to do a lot more, as a Chancellor desperate to return to low-tax, small-state Conservatism after being forced to do things opposite to his political instincts during the pandemic. Labour support the measures that have been trailed, but wants the National Insurance hike scrapped altogether, and a windfall tax on oil and gas producers to be used to scrap VAT on energy bills and extend energy bill discounts for those on low incomes. (The government’s view is that a windfall tax would simply hamper the ability of oil and gas producers to invest in their transition to sustainable energy.) And it isn’t only Labour wondering if the support is sufficient; Conservative MPs are also worried about the impact of spiralling costs on their constituents.

But the disagreement between the Conservatives and Labour is not just about how government should respond to the cost of living crisis, but how we got here in the first place. The next big political debate will be about the extent to which the Conservative’s stewardship of the economy has caused a worse crisis in the UK than other countries.   

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Content from our partners
The shrinking road to net zero
The tree-planting misconception
Is your business ready for corporate climate reporting?

Topics in this article: , , ,