Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
13 December 2017

What does a meaningful parliamentary vote on Brexit actually look like?

Clue: not what the government is suggesting. 

By Eloise Todd

On Wednesday, David Davis wrote an early morning letter to Conservative MPs promising that the government would guarantee a vote in Parliament in October 2018 on the deal it will have negotiated with the EU. These promises are not worth the paper they are written on. MPs are due to vote this evening on an amendment put forward by former Attorney General and Conservative MP Dominic Grieve to ensure Parliament gets a meaningful vote on the final deal the government agrees with EU negotiators.

The amendment has wide cross-party support, including, we hope around 15 Conservative MPs – enough to potentially defeat the government.

If the government is sincere in what it says, not to mention keen to avoid an embarrassing defeat, it should just accept Dominic Grieve’s Amendment 7, which truly guarantees a meaningful vote by writing it into the EU Withdrawal Bill itself.

Grieve’s Amendment 7 makes the powers the government wants to give itself via the EU Withdrawal Bill to carry out Brexit conditional on a vote in Parliament. This means MPs would be able to decide whether to approve whatever deal Theresa May comes up with in negotiations with the EU.

Amendment 7 makes a legal guarantee that the government has to listen to what Parliament has to say. At present, the EU Withdrawal Bill gives those powers to the government without any oversight. The fact the government won’t accept Amendment 7 proves it does not really care about parliamentary sovereignty. It wants the vote next October to be ornamental and meaningless – a rubber stamp on whatever it has already decided.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Its unwillingness to listen to Parliament and even to its MPs shows just how fragile this government is. A sensible amendment like this should be easy for it to accept and incorporate into its plans.

Content from our partners
Data on cloud will change the way you interact with the government
Defining a Kodak culture for the future
How do we restore trust in the public sector?

Instead, it is attempting to stage a shambolic and pointless battle of wills with Conservative moderates who support the amendment. While Davis has been applying a soft touch, Chief Whip Julian Smith has been reportedly been readying a sharpened carrot overnight, trying everything from cajoling to arm-twisting to force the moderates back under thumb.

What’s even more shameful than this whole shambles is the government’s decision to give back the whip last night to Anne Marie Morris – the Conservative MP suspended for the last five months for disgusting racist remarks – in order to boost its numbers in the vote this evening.

Moderate Conservative and even some waivering Labour MPs need to stand firm this evening against these dirty tactics and ensure a meaningful vote is written into law.

Eloise Todd is the chief executive at Best for Britain, which is campaigning for a meaningful vote on the final Brexit deal. Follow her @eloisetodd.