Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
23 June 2021

How Brexit changed us: The referendum was always a solution in search of a problem

Political decision-making ought to be a matter of knowing how to identify real dysfunctions in social life and public policy, and then working out what can and can’t be changed.

By Rowan Williams

I can remember at the time of the Brexit vote describing the proposal as a solution in search of a problem. This is not simply an appeal to the “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” principle. Political decision-making surely ought to be a matter of knowing how to identify real dysfunctions in social life and public policy, and then working out what can and can’t be changed, with what consequential costs or benefits in other areas of life and policy. What was and is startling about Brexit is the sheer fluid vagueness around all this; which is not to say that the Remain advocates did any better with specifics.

And the trouble is that licensed chaos on this scale sets a precedent for other matters to be dealt with in the same unfocused way, so that the eyes of the government will be fixed on what tomorrow’s media plebiscites will present rather than on seeking a shared analysis of what’s wrong. If you have that, you can start disagreeing about how to mend it; but there can’t be intelligent disagreement without some convergence about what needs resolving.

Against this background, the sustained confusion through the pandemic period about what exactly the problem is has been just what the Brexit debate helped to foster. Punch-and-Judy oppositions have been set up – economic recovery! Medical stability! Mental health! Educational standards! Freedom! Safety! – on the basis of opportunistic readings of public opinion. We have a political culture more than ever in flight from the substantive issues of what kind of society we could or should be in relation to the long-term changes in our world (economic, environmental, epidemiological) that
can’t be wished away. Like far too many other nations in today’s world, we settled for an instant, consumerised political discourse at just the moment when we desperately needed analysis and foresight.

Rowan Williams was Archbishop of Canterbury from 2002 to 2012

This article is from our “How Brexit changed us” series, marking five years since the referendum.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Content from our partners
Transport is the core of levelling up
The forgotten crisis: How businesses can boost biodiversity
Small businesses can be the backbone of our national recovery