Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
29 October 2019

Would an early general election mean the Fixed-term Parliaments Act is a failure?

Actually, from a liberal perspective, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act is fulfilling its purpose.

By Stephen Bush

Boris Johnson will today launch a fourth attempt to go to the country early, by putting forward a short bill to put aside the Fixed-term Parliaments Act and set the date of the next election for 12 December 2019.

Under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act, an early election can only be secured via a two-thirds majority of MPs – in practice, that means that unless the governing party and the main opposition party agree to hold one, an election cannot be secured under the act.

This wouldn’t repeal the act; it would just circumvent it for one election only. Does that mean the Fixed-term Parliaments Act doesn’t matter? Well, yes and no.

The main purpose of the act – which had been a policy objective in every Liberal Democrat manifesto since the party’s foundation in 1989 – is to take the power to set the next election date out of the prime minister’s hands and into the hands of parliament. That remains the case. Of course, at most elections in recent times, the prime minister of the day has enjoyed a legislative majority, so the matter does not arise.

The most important policy achievements of the act remain in place. An unpopular prime minister cannot bounce his or her party into an election in order to head off a coup against them. Before the act came into law, Theresa May would have been able to seek another election in the face of her Brexit defeats. Instead, her MPs were able to set their party’s direction, not have them enforced from above.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

And an opportunistic prime minister cannot hold an election at a time that suits them alone. Before the act was passed, Boris Johnson would have been able to dissolve parliament and force through a no-deal Brexit during the 25 working days required by an election, or seek an election at a time of a choosing. Now, if he gets an election, it will be through negotiation with other parties.

Far from being a failure, the Fixed-term Parliaments Act is fulfilling its purposes from a liberal perspective – it is limiting the power of the executive to act as it wishes and has relocated power in the elected parliament. The tragedy is that the act may not survive the next Conservative majority government.