Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
22 October 2019updated 06 Sep 2021 2:38pm

Why isn’t Labour listening to Naz Shah’s concerns about Salma Yaqoob?

Some would have us think Labour mayoral candidate Salma Yaqoob is Britain’s answer to Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez. Her behaviour suggests otherwise.

By Henna Shah

Naz Shah, the Labour MP for Bradford West, is not a conventional politician. She has been remarkably open about how her politics are shaped by her background. Abandoned by her father at 6, she was sent to Pakistan by her mother aged 12 in an attempt to protect her from her violent stepfather. She was then forced into an arranged marriage with an abusive partner, which she later left..

Upon her return to the UK, not only did she work to support her mother, who was jailed for killing her abusive partner, but campaigned for her release and cared for her two siblings. Since then, she has committed herself to public service and campaigning, and is currently shadow women and equalities minister.

Why, then, did Labour’s ruling national executive choose to ignore her when she wrote to them explaining that Salma Yaqoob’s endorsement of a misogynistic campaign against her means she is not fit to be a Labour candidate for the West Midlands metro mayoralty?

Bradford is known for its biradri politics – particularly among the conservative Pakistani community. The biradri system is based almost exclusively on personal relationships between men, and their ability to exercise and retain power based on patriarchal notions of honour and shame. These men get together – often in male-only spaces such as mosques – to discuss local issues and take political decisions. Women are expected to exercise their democratic rights in consultation with their male relatives and are often excluded completely from the conversation.

Spousal abuse is common, and it is often argued that this abuse should be tolerated by women for the sake of family honour. Women who leave abusive relationships are often maligned and, even where women do not end the relationship, it is often assumed that their unwillingness to ‘compromise’ or their lack of subservience is the problem.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday - from the New Statesman. The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. Stay up to date with NS events, subscription offers & updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

This highly patriarchal culture that enforces moral double standards based on gender makes it incredibly difficult for women in politics. Where women are able to break through the barriers of the biradri system, their morality comes under intense scrutiny, often from self-appointed ‘community leaders’ who flaunt their religious credentials.

When Salma Yaqoob chose to run against Naz Shah in Bradford at the 2017 general election, she was not ignorant of these structures of power and how they operate. Neither was she ignorant of how they operated in the past, for example how George Galloway – then running for Respect – used biradri politics in 2015 when he claimed, amongst other things, that Naz had lied about the circumstances of her abusive marriage. In fact, Yaqoob chose to leave the Respect party in 2012, partly because of George Galloway’s attitude towards women.

Content from our partners
How are new rail networks boosting the economy?
Setting the stage for action on climate finance
Drowning in legacy tech: the move to sustainable computing – with Chrome Enterprise

If this wasn’t enough, Shah says she contacted Yaqoob before the 2017 election, explaining the situation and asking her not to stand in Bradford West – not to harness the power of a misogynistic system against a woman from the community who is actively, and successfully, fighting against it.

What followed was a campaign rife with misogyny, including a rally where a man said people should vote for the ‘most Muslim’ candidate, and another where a man likened Shah to a dog, claiming you ‘check a dog’s pedigree’, and that you need to look at her appearance and see what effect she’ll have on the next generation.

Both of those speeches were made with the intent to shame Naz Shah. When the man spoke about the ‘most Muslim’ candidate, he drew a direct comparison between Yaqoob, who wears a hijab and Shah, who does not. He insinuated that because Shah does not wear a hijab that she is less Muslim, less moral, and less worthy. When the second man spoke about her pedigree, her appearance and her impact on future generations, not only was his comparison highly offensive – dogs being considered dirty in Islamic cultures – but he was also shaming her for her family background.

Yaqoob’s decision was an example of personal ambition trumping solidarity with Naz Shah as an individual – and a fellow British Pakistani woman. But it also failed every single woman in that community. By allowing these people to speak in support of her, Yaqoob endorsed the culture of shame and dishonour that surrounds women who fall foul of these ridiculous moral double standards – of women who leave abusive relationships or even women who choose not to cover their heads.

If Salma Yaqoob was ever serious about our rights as Muslim women, about representing our struggles, and about platforming our voices, she would never have used biradri politics against Naz Shah. And the Labour party, if it is serious about empowering women, would have taken Naz Shah’s letter seriously. Or at least, we could expect them to adhere to normal practice, whereby candidates who stand against Labour are automatically excluded from standing for five years. The party’s argument is that the contest is currently between two white men – are they seriously suggesting Salma Yaqoob is the only person available to change that?

It seems some would have us think Salma Yaqoob is Britain’s answer to Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez. Her behaviour suggests otherwise.

Henna Shah is policy and programmes lead at Progress