Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
18 July 2019updated 07 Jun 2021 2:49pm

No, we should not feel sympathy for Theresa May. Her policies have ruined lives

By Jonn Elledge

Watching it live, the speech had the quality of one of those nightmares in which you find yourself retaking your A-levels aged 34, or about to go on stage to play Hamlet without a clue about the lines. Except it wasn’t you it was happening to, it was Theresa May. And worse for her, if not for her audience, it was really, genuinely happening.

The speech, to the 2017 Conservative Party Conference, started confidently enough. The inevitable and tedious personal journey stuff. The apology for the disastrous snap election campaign, which had wiped out her majority and her political authority at a stroke.

But then it all went wrong. First a comedian dressed as a Spad showed up to hand her a P45 (“Boris asked me to give you this”) which, bafflingly, she meekly accepted. Then the coughing fit, which during the biggest speech of her life temporarily rendered the Prime Minister incapable of that most basic of political skills, reading from an autocue. And then, in the final indignity, the lettering on the wall behind her began to fall off. “Building a country that works  or everyone”, indeed.

It was horrifyingly, cringemakingly awful to watch, of course. But it was also, let’s be honest, funny: live coverage of hubris meeting nemesis, like that bit on The X-Factor when someone discovers in front of six million people that they can’t actually sing. And so I was surprised by the suggestion from some quarters, not all of them Tory, that our main response should be one of sympathy — and that if you weren’t feeling it, your reaction was somehow inhuman.

We’re hearing those same exhortations to feel sympathy for May again now. Suggestions are made that we’ll miss her, once she’s gone. How, as the Johnson premiership looms, could we not feel sympathetic towards the woman who we’re told so often was guided simply by her sense of duty, and who tried her damnedest to prevent the horror of no deal?

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

And once again, I’m not feeling it. Because Theresa May wasn’t some passive victim of historical forces. She’s the one who created this mess.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

It was May, after all, who gave us the line – one she clearly never believed – that “no deal is better than a bad deal”, encouraging us to believe that cutting all trade ties with our biggest market was something that might actually be somehow good. For all the talk of a new centre ground in British politics, she spent her premiership fuelling Brexiteer extremism, trying to reconcile the irreconcilables, all the while refusing – during a minority government – to even consider reaching across the aisle until it was far too late.

It was she who encouraged the idea that Remainers were traitors; that opposition was illegitimate; that “citizens of the world” were “citizens of nowhere” whose loyalties were inherently somehow suspect. “Words have consequences,” she said in her valedictory speech at Chatham House this week. She might well have been talking to herself.

Worse than May’s words were her policies. Her refusal to guarantee the rights of European citizens in Britain left millions of our friends and neighbours feeling adrift and insecure, betrayed by their adopted home, and had the neat side-effect of ensuring similar treatment for British citizens in Europe. Her determination to cut net migration at all costs has ruined lives and separated families. Why, exactly, are we required to feel sympathy for a woman who showed so little to those whose lives were wrecked by her policies?

May’s premiership has been a failure. She is unlikely to get a flattering write-up in the history books. But she will live on in wealth and comfort in a country that she can call home. The same cannot be said of those affected by the decisions she has made.

That conference speech was humiliating for May, as was so much that has happened to her since. But she was a bad prime minister, whose policies have caused literally millions of people untold pain. What comes next may well be worse. But, no: we should not feel sympathy for Theresa May.