Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
25 October 2018

“The crazies” might not have removed Theresa May, but they block her path at every turn

The Prime Minister survived her meeting with the 1922 Committee. But at what price?

By Stephen Bush

Theresa May is going nowhere – in both senses. The Prime Minister addressed Conservative backbenchers at the 1922 Committee last night and, far from triggering a leadership crisis, it presaged an outbreak of Tory unity. (Patrick, who was eavesdropping in the committee corridor, has more from the meeting.)

But what’s the price of survival? To even get this far, May has had to double down on promises to her party that cannot be reconciled with either her negotiating partners in the EU27 or command the support of a majority of MPs in Parliament.

Shortly after the election, one Conservative backbencher, who is usually a pretty reliable barometer of backbench opinion, sketched out a path to a Brexit deal. The view of the Commons, they said, was clear on what Brexit it wanted: one that retained the UK’s membership of the single market and customs union, a Brexit that had the benefit of honouring the United Kingdom’s strategic objectives as far as the Irish border and the constitutional position of Northern Ireland in the bargain. Sooner or later that will would assert itself – provided, they warned, that “the crazies” in their own party didn’t come for Theresa May before Parliament was able to assert itself. 

“The crazies” might not have removed Theresa May, but they block her path at every turn. She can’t pass their preferred loose high regulatory freedom, low market access Canada-style deal because that would either mean a hard border on the island of Ireland or in the Irish Sea. They won’t accept an arrangement that keeps only Northern Ireland in the regulatory orbit of the European Union, as that has implications for the territorial integrity of the United Kingdom. But they won’t accept an arrangement that does that for the whole United Kingdom, as that isn’t a real Brexit as far as they’re concerned. They won’t even accept a transition that extends past the next election, which might deliver a parliamentary majority for the Brexit they crave, as they fear transition will last forever. So what’s left? The answer, unless the politics shift, is for the United Kingdom to leave without a deal. 

In those circumstances, that it was Theresa May, not David Davis or Boris Johnson in charge when the crisis hit is unlikely to provide anyone much comfort. 

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

Content from our partners
Transport is the core of levelling up
The forgotten crisis: How businesses can boost biodiversity
Small businesses can be the backbone of our national recovery