Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
12 September 2018

Leader: Ten years on from the financial crash, Britain’s economic model remains broken

For Britain, the sixth largest economy in the world, austerity has always been a choice, rather than a necessity. 

By New Statesman

A decade has now passed since the collapse of Lehman Brothers, precipitating a worldwide financial crisis. In country after country the state intervened to save capitalism from itself: the commanding heights of the US mortgage market and the UK banking sector were, in effect, nationalised.

In the months that followed, Britain and other major states deployed the classic Keynesian tool of fiscal stimulus (public spending and tax cuts). China, as the economic historian Adam Tooze has noted, responded with “the most dramatic work-creation stimulus in history”.

Such interventions prevented a global recession becoming a depression, as had happened in the 1930s. But the premature and excessive austerity imposed by the UK and other countries led to the slowest economic recovery in history. In Britain, where average annual earnings are nearly £800 below their pre-crisis peak, wage growth has been weaker than at any time since the Napoleonic wars. In the European Union, where the structural flaws of the eurozone thwarted recovery, the far right has resurged across the continent (most recently in Sweden, as Andrew Brown writes this week).

It is inaccurate to say, as some do, that no lessons have been learned from the financial crisis. Banks have been forced to increase the amount of capital they hold against potential losses and “shadow banking” has been brought under regulatory control.

But in other respects, as the economist Grace Blakeley writes, far too little has changed. The UK remains dependent on a financialised model of growth sustained by exorbitant consumer debt. Under a system of so-called privatised Keynesianism, households are forced to borrow more as the state borrows less. The meagre GDP growth forecast over the next five years is still dependent on household debt rising from 139 per cent of disposable income to 146 per cent. In an age of austerity and wage stagnation, work is no longer a guarantee of economic security.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

None of this, however, is inevitable. For Britain, the sixth largest economy in the world, with its own currency and low borrowing costs, austerity has been a choice, rather than a necessity. National governments have a duty to manage the public finances responsibly. But as economic evidence shows, the best long-term means of debt reduction is productive investment (which is lower in the UK than any other G7 country), not ideologically driven cuts. Government borrowing, it is said, will “burden” younger generations. Yet austerity has enfeebled the collective institutions that they depend on.

After eight years of anaemic growth, the UK is now due another recession, based on historic trends. With Bank of England interest rates at just 0.75 per cent, the Conservatives’ favoured combination of “monetary activism and fiscal conservatism” would no longer be an option. Yet Britain has the capacity to renew itself and abandon a short-termist, financialised model for one founded on long-term investment. Sadly, it is preoccupied by Brexit.

This article appears in the 12 Sep 2018 issue of the New Statesman, The return of fascism