New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
  2. Brexit
11 July 2018updated 24 Jun 2021 12:21pm

Jacob Rees-Mogg’s wrecking amendments prove it is Labour, not the Brexiteers, in control

Unless the Opposition plays ball, the ERG has no power.

By Stephen Bush

Nice precarious hold on power you’ve got there, Prime Minister. Shame if anything happened to it.

The European Research Group will seek to make that threat plain with a series of amendments to the Trade and Customs Bill tabled by Jacob Rees-Mogg.

But looking at the amendments in full, they illustrate the ERG’s weakness, rather than its strength.

The biggest problem, of course, is that for them to be effective at all they not only have to deliver their seven rebels but the opposition parties have to opt to vote with them. There is, of course, precedent for the Labour party voting against its own policy preferences on Europe to make life difficult  for a weak Conservative government: John Smith did the same over Maastricht. You can see how Labour could find an excuse to vote for these amendments – but if the SNP, Liberal Democrats, Plaid Cymru and Caroline Lucas vote against the ERG’s amendments (and in the case of all four of those groups you can see a strong political case for them in voting against “the hard Brexit of the ERG”) it is tricky to see how any rebellion won’t be cancelled out by other parties.  

It is also worth assuming that some pro-European Labour MPs will also vote down the ERG’s amendments. And from a policy perspective, the amendments create problems for the hard Brexiteers as much as Theresa May, in some cases more.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Take that concerning the Irish border, which would legally prohibit a separate customs regime for Northern Ireland and the rest of the United Kingdom. The government could very easily defuse this by tabling a near-identical amendment or simply accepting this one, and May has in case already committed to not having further barriers between Northern Ireland and the United Kingdom. But this is a problem for the ERG, not the government: May can keep this promise and satisfy hers and Vote Leave’s pledge on avoiding the Irish border with a Brexit that keeps the United Kingdom as a whole within the regulatory and customs orbit of the European Union. It isn’t the soft Brexiteers who are hamstrung by the need to preserve an open border between Northern Ireland and the United Kingdom: it is the Brexiteers.

And that exposes the real problem – if the Brexiteers want to damage Theresa May, they will have to find ways that harm her more than them, and where the support of the Opposition is guaranteed: but that will require a willingness to wreck domestic legislation, not simply to tack amendments to Brexit laws.

Content from our partners
Can green energy solutions deliver for nature and people?
"Why wouldn't you?" Joining the charge towards net zero
The road to clean power 2030