New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Politics
  2. Northern Ireland
15 May 2018updated 24 Jun 2021 12:22pm

The government has little choice but to introduce direct rule in Northern Ireland

After nearly a year and a half of indecision, the government’s bluff has been called by the courts. Leaving it to the civil servants is no longer an option. 

By Patrick Maguire

Nearly 16 months after an ailing Martin McGuinness resigned as Northern Ireland’s deputy first minister, bringing its devolved government down in the process, no solution to the province’s constitutional impasse is forthcoming. 

Sinn Fein and the Democratic Unionist Party have failed to broker the powersharing agreement necessary to restore government at Stormont and show little inclination to do so. 

Both James Brokenshire and his successor as Northern Ireland Secretary, Karen Bradley, meanwhile, have proven pathologically unwilling to reintroduce direct rule from Westminster – despite recent calls from their government’s unionist partners to do so. 

Instead, Northern Irish politics has operated in a curious and confusing limbo. Both secretaries of state set budgets from Westminster, but chose to indulge the fiction that the restoration of power-sharing was a live prospect (which, save for a few fleeting moments, has seldom been the case) rather than legislate to introduce direct rule from Westminster. 

That, in practice, has meant civil servants taking day-to-day decisions for Northern Ireland – not just administrative ones, but increasingly political ones too. Such decisions, like the approval of a planning application for a £240m incinerator in Mallusk, Co Antrim, by a civil servant last September, are unglamorous but essential to the business of running a country. 

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

Civil servants have complained such decisions are beyond their competency. And in the continued absence of elected politicians, they are also constitutionally ambiguous. Where is the democratic accountability? What right do unelected officials have to pursue a policy agenda above and beyond existing policy? With no prospect of a devolved government returning anytime soon, what right do they not to?

For the past 15 months, these questions have, for the most part, stayed rhetorical. Yesterday, however, the High Court gave an answer. A judicial review found that civil servants did not have the power to have approved the Mallusk incinerator, and concluded that it could not be assumed that “such decision-making would continue in Northern Ireland in the absence of ministers without the protection of democratic accountability”. 

The upshot of this is that governing Northern Ireland by direct rule lite – with a Westminster-set budget and civil service-led administration – is now close to completely untenable. Other seemingly routine decisions face similar questions.

The effect of yesterday’s ruling is twofold: not only could it constrain civil servants in a real, legal sense, but its chilling effect will discourage them from taking any decision, however necessary, that could leave them open to a further judicial review. 

Drifting with no ministerial oversight will no longer cut it. The government has had its bluff called and must clearly now do something. Legally, that something can only be a new assembly election, or direct rule. On balance of probabilities, the former, bitterly confrontational and inconclusive as it would likely be, would bury devolution rather than save it.

Direct rule, which would further corrode the limited stock of the government among nationalists and in Dublin, would prove just as toxic. Calls for the introduction of the British-Irish intergovernmental conference have gone unheeded. But if the months since the vote for Brexit have proved anything, it’s that the government has the stomach for taking decisions that irritate the green side of the argument. 

So why not direct rule? The real anxiety preventing action by ministers and officials is that governing Northern Ireland effectively from Westminster will prove near-impossible on a legislative timetable already choked by the demands of Brexit. Yesterday’s decision, however, means that they are going to have to try. 

The government’s defining mission will now be complicated not just by the dreary steeples of Fermanagh and Tyrone, but by the electricity interconnectors of Armagh and incinerators of Antrim too.

Content from our partners
An innovative approach to regional equity
ADHD in the criminal justice system: a case for change – with Takeda
The power of place in tackling climate change