Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. World
  2. Europe
12 March 2018updated 24 Jun 2021 12:25pm

Steve Bannon wants to reclaim the word racist. So let’s find a word he can’t reclaim

I mean, no one in their right mind is going to proudly go round claiming to be a shitbag, are they?

By Jonn Elledge

Steve Bannon – former Trump staffer, co-founder of Breitbart, a man who looks suspiciously like he’s just been dredged up following a two-day stint at the bottom of a canal – is, like many a nationalist menace before him, touring Europe. This weekend he was in Paris, speaking to Marine Le Pen’s Front National.

There are many upsetting things about his speech, quite apart from the fact he’d given it at all. The attempt to position the French far-right and the current occupant of the White House as part of the same movement is one. The claim that “history is on our side” – a claim which, as any number of wags pointed out, could be dispelled by as little as 30 seconds on the Wikipedia page for World War Two – is another.

Perhaps the most worrying bit, though, is this one:

“You fight for your country and they call you racist. But the days when those kind of insults work is over. The establishment media are the dogs of the system. Every day, we become stronger and they become weaker. Let them call you racists, xenophobes or whatever else, wear these like a medal.”

There are a couple of reasons this is worrying. One is that it’s another step towards the normalisation of hate speech. We’ve already had “It’s not racist to talk about immigration”, and “very real concerns”. “What’s wrong with being racist?” is the obvious next step, and fuck that.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

The other is the horrible suspicion it might actually work. There’s a long history of oppressed groups appropriating terms used to abuse them, and using them to drain them of their power: “queer” in the gay community, the n-word in rap. Racists are not in any way oppressed, of course – would that they were – but that’s not stopped them pulling this sort of trick before, and if Racist Pride becomes a thing then we’re all in trouble.

Content from our partners
Small businesses can be the backbone of our national recovery
Railways must adapt to how we live now
“I learn something new on every trip"

So here’s my proposal. If these fuckers are willing to wear words like “racist”, “xenophobe” or “Nazi” as a medal, we need to start describing them with a word they can’t possibly treat as such. We need a word they will never want to appropriate.

What should this new label be? Ideally, it needs to be something that nobody would want to use about themselves – one that’s going to make them look sad rather than cool, and basically gross people out. It needs to be at least mildly abusive but, unlike so many terms of abuse, which relate straight back to someone’s genitals, needs to not be gendered. And ideally, to give us maximum flexibility here, it should work as both a noun and an adjective.

My suggestion, inspired by Bannon himself, is “shitbag”. I mean, no one in their mind is going to proudly go round claiming to be a shitbag, are they? Even the kind of people who bafflingly think that Pepe the Frog looks kind of awesome are going to think twice about greeting strangers with, “Actually, I’m a shitbag”.

The term is grammatically flexible, too. We can refer to racist shitbags or xenophobic shitbags, to emphasise the point and get people used to the word’s new implications. But we can also refer to “shitbag commentator Steve Bannon”, or “Marine Le Pen, leader of the French shitbags” and it still works. I, personally, would prefer LBC to stop giving shitbags a platform.

I’m not necessarily attached to this specific word – apart from anything else, it may struggle with over-zealous corporate email filters – so I am open to alternative suggestions. But I suspect this isn’t the last we’re going to hear of the “let’s reclaim the label ‘racist’” argument. Before it gets too far, we need to come up with an alternative, and the sooner we all settle on one the more chance we have of it sticking.

Using the word “shitbag” to describe racists would imply that racists are literally just sagging carriers of shit. Rather like Steve Bannon himself. You’re welcome to come up with a better label for these shitbags – but frankly, I think you’re going to struggle.