Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
13 July 2017

The problem with Theresa May’s vision for the “just about managing“? She didn’t have one

The phrase turned out to mean almost nothing.

By Stephen Bush

Happy anniversary, Prime Minister! And what better way to celebrate it than with a copy of the NS? “The Maybot malfunctions” is our cover story – and the subject of my column, too.

The PM has chosen to mark the anniversary with a sit-down interview with the Sun‘s Tom Newton Dunn. Among the headlines: her plea to be allowed to remain in place for the “next few years” to get on with the job of negotiating Brexit.

But the meat of the interview is her account of what she thinks went wrong: that the election campaign didn’t focus on her vision of what the country should be – to help out the “just about managing”.

The difficulty with that diagnosis is, when you look at the rest of the Conservative manifesto – minus the dementia tax, the fox hunting, the ivory ban, the cuts to school lunches and the other self-inflicted wounds – it’s hard to stand up the idea there was some vision for the “just about managing” in there. Say what you like about, say, Help to Buy and its wider consequences on Britain’s overheated housing market, but it did at least offer something to boomer landlords and upwardly mobile dual-earner couples, two essential pillars of the Cameron electoral coalition both of which went elsewhere under Theresa May.

The political strength of that “just about managing” brand is that it can mean almost anyone: from those “just about managing” to make rent to “just about managing” to get a takeaway at the end of the week to “just about managing” to pay for private schools. But its political weakness was that it turned out to mean almost nobody.

Select and enter your email address Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. Your new guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture each weekend - from the New Statesman. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how New Statesman Media Group may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.

The difficult truth is that if May had a vision for the just about managing, she’d be able to offer a series of popular measures that would, at the least, be politically painful for Labour to oppose and might save her reputation. But she doesn’t, so she can’t. 

Instead, all she’ll leave her eventual successor is an insight that is essentially correct but didn’t go anywhere: that a society in which a decreasing number of people feel any stake or security will take increasingly radical political turns, be they for Brexit or Corbynism.