Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
28 July 2017

How maverick smelliers are reinventing the world of perfume

The sheets of an unmade bed are soaked in a familiar and mildly rebarbative scent.

By Kate Mossman

A child at his school’s “show and tell” session informs his classmates that when you smell something, it means bits of it have gone up your nose – which is why you should never go in the bathroom straight after your dad. The Australian writer Kate Grenville, who repeats this story in a weird new book, is tormented by the thought.

Bits of smell do go up your nose, she says: they lock on to the stringy end of nerve receptors connected to your brain. “I picture a tea-strainer with bits of dental floss hanging down through the holes.”

A winner of prizes for her fiction, Grenville is a victim of “acute fragrance sensitivity” – in short, perfume is ruining her life. In The Case Against Fragrance (which her publishers begged her not write), she calls for a ban on artificial smells in public places. She sprints through airports with a scarf over her nose, hangs her head out of pine-fresh taxis like a dog, and carries fragrance-free soap in her handbag, to wash off handshakes from perfumed fans who “have no idea that a choice they made that morning resulted in me having a headache”.

Grenville sets out to unlock the dark science – the volatile compounds, conspiracies and carcinogens – hiding in perfume, the ingredients of which are regularly listed as alcohol, water and the mysterious catch-all “fragrance”…

I enjoyed learning that “musk” comes from the Sanskrit word for testicle, is originally derived from a stag’s balls, and that the muscone molecule became a key element in the “clean laundry” smell used by detergent companies, once scientists had learned to remove the “faecal element”. Synthetic scent production began back in 1884.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

In London’s Somerset House, an exhibition called “The Art of Perfume” celebrates the kind of molecular manipulations that drive Grenville to distraction. Fragrances have long been marketed by the great fashion houses because, well, how else do you advertise a smell? But the internet is encouraging a rise in maverick smelliers making and selling unconventional concoctions.

Content from our partners
How do we secure the hybrid office?
How materials innovation can help achieve net zero and level-up the UK
Fantastic mental well-being strategies and where to find them

In the show, the sheets of an unmade bed are soaked in a familiar and mildly rebarbative scent: this is Antoine Lie’s Sécrétions Magnifiques, a chemical evocation of milk, blood, sweat, saliva – and semen (in perfumier’s terms, 2-methyl-2-pentenoic acid). There is a room dedicated to Geza Schoen’s ridiculous Molecule 01 – the mythic “un-perfume”, so called because its single smell molecule is too large for the nose, meaning that some people can’t smell it at all. If you do get a whiff, it’s a bit like standing in the hardboard aisle at B&Q. It’s 36 quid on the internet.

Then there was my favourite, from the Brooklyn hipster-cum-musician Killian Wells. In a mock-up of a fairground photo booth, his creation – a powerful hit of chlorine and plastic – is smelt through the fabric stomach of a toy bear. This is Dark Ride, “an olfactory snap of a log flume”, modelled on the scent of the Splash Mountain and Pirates of the Caribbean rides at Disney World. It’s not simply like a swimming pool – it’s mouldy, too, ugly and compelling. People buy it! (One reviewer writes: “My brain said no way but somehow my nose wanted more.”)

In a hotel, Grenville tapes up the cracks in her bedroom door to block out some powerful potpourri down the hallway and “seals herself in like a pharaoh”.

The irony about perfume, for most of us, is that once we’ve put it on, we can’t smell it anyway – like the scent I had from the high-end knicker shop Agent Provocateur, which came in a bulbous china “boob”. It had a strange odour that could be described as “notes of gusset”. I put more on every day, in an all-male office, because I couldn’t smell it, until someone had a word with me. Then, for a while, I used a bottle of aftershave, Acqua di Gio, which I found on the floor of an Amtrak train. I liked it because it made me feel like a man. Now, I wear Sarah Jessica Parker’s Lovely, which was half price in Superdrug.

This article appears in the 26 Jul 2017 issue of the New Statesman, Summer double issue