Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
2 November 2016updated 30 Jul 2021 5:11am

PMQs review: Corbyn forces May to address the welfare cruelty exposed in I, Daniel Blake

Squeezed by coverage of Brexit and the US elections, the Labour leader managed to focus the Prime Minister on the suffering of benefits claimants.

By Anoosh Chakelian

It’s a horrible irony of British politics that those who rely on it the most get the least say in it. Nowhere is that starker than the benefits system. Successive governments have overhauled, poked at, and cut the welfare budget for years with only a cursory thought for the people who actually use it. This is usually to court votes, make arbitrary savings and bolster rhetoric – safe in the knowledge that claimants who are affected the most are the least able to complain.

This is why Jeremy Corbyn’s line of questioning at today’s session of Prime Minister’s Questions was pretty impressive. He managed to force Theresa May’s focus onto a welfare system that the Conservatives have notoriously and clumsily played with – with disastrous consequences for Britain’s vulnerable.

“On the steps of Downing Street, the Prime Minister promised to stand up for families who are ‘just managing’ to get by,” Corbyn told the House. “However, we now know these were just empty words.”

The Labour leader went on to criticise May’s cuts to Universal Credit, the government’s beleaguered new welfare scheme, claiming they would “leave millions worse off”. He linked this, rather smartly, to George Osborne u-turning on tax credit cuts, by describing it as “slipping the same cuts in through the backdoor”.

Corbyn urged the government to review the “whole punitive benefit sanctions regime”, referring to the case of ex-serviceman David Clapson, who died three weeks after his benefits were sanctioned. He called the sanction system, “institutionalised barbarity against often very vulnerable people”.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. A handy, three-minute glance at the week ahead in companies, markets, regulation and investment, landing in your inbox every Monday morning. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A weekly dig into the New Statesman’s archive of over 100 years of stellar and influential journalism, sent each Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.
I consent to New Statesman Media Group collecting my details provided via this form in accordance with the Privacy Policy

It’s not easy for May to defend the Tories’ reforms to this system – they’ve made a lot of mistakes and unpopular proposals over the years. And they know it. They’ve had to row back on a number of attempts to change the system – partially reversing the Bedroom Tax, dropping tax credit cut proposals, announcing a review of Work Capability Assessments for people with disabilities, scrapping retesting for chronically ill sickness benefit claimants, etc.

Corbyn forcing May to defend sanctions and finding disabled or ill claimants fit for work put her in an unflattering light. It renders her response – that Labour “is drifting away from the views of Labour voters. It’s this party that understands the views of working class people” – a little hollow. Particularly when Universal Credit includes in-work benefits. The government that claims it “works for everyone” is still the “Nasty Party”.

And it comes at a time when the cruelty of welfare reform is on the agenda, with the latest release from socialist director Ken Loach, I, Daniel Blake, which Corbyn recommended to May. A film sparking such high-profile debate that the Work & Pensions Secretary Damian Green had to respond to it in the Commons this week.

Content from our partners
Helping children be safer, smarter, happier internet explorers
Power to the people
How to power the electric vehicle revolution

But May didn’t seem too keen on a trip to the cinema. She tackled questions on welfare the way Tory Prime Ministers always do – by exploiting Labour’s persistent problem of appearing soft on the subject. She accused Corbyn of wanting “no assessments, no sanctions, and unlimited welfare!” Twice.

Sadly, it’s probably enough. Loach’s film has been a success, but it won’t have achieved a wholesale shift in public opinion. Yet that doesn’t diminish Corbyn’s performance. It has become a trope of political commentary now to accuse him not of incompetence, but of invisibility. As with all Westminster received wisdom, it’s clichéd and overblown, but there’s some truth in it. The government battling a war on all fronts – Europe, business, and its own backbenches – on Brexit, and the horrorshow of the imminent US election, has hampered the opposition’s airtime. But by forcing the government to address its welfare shortcomings, Corbyn showed he can capture the narrative on subjects that are all too often overlooked. With a little help from his friend.