Support 110 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
16 May 2016updated 12 Oct 2023 10:44am

“Wentworthism”: What the execution of an advisor to Charles I tells us about modern politics

The problem always begins and ends with the king.

By Stephen Bush

On a spring morning in May 1641, Thomas Wentworth was executed in front of the Tower of London. His crime? To serve faithfully in the court of Charles I in during the years 1629 to 1640, when the Stuart king ruled without parliament – until he blundered into a religious war with Scotland.

Wentworth carried the can for Charles’ failures, for the borderline- illegal way he went about raising money without parliamentary sanction, for his attempts to enforce a liturgical revolution on the Scottish Church. His death was supposed to bring an end to the feuding between king and parliament.

But of course, it didn’t. Because the friction wasn’t the fault of Wentworth, but of Charles I – and less than a year later, Parliament and the King were at war. Yes, Wentworth was an absolutist administrator who raised money in ways that might have been within the letter but were outside the spirit of the law. But he had been appointed by a king who thought the same way. Merely executing a luckless adviser wasn’t enough – to fix the problem, Parliament had to execute the king.

Even 375 years after his death, what you might call “Wentworthism” is alive and well in modern political discourse. For many years, Conservative backbenchers have blamed David Cameron’s less-than-full-throated commitment to untrammelled conservatism on a cast of advisers and civil servants: on Jeremy Heywood, Whitehall’s chief mandarin, or Ed Llewellyn, his chief of staff, or Craig Oliver, his director of communications.

Wentworthism extends well past backbenchers and into the commentariat – see this article by Bruce Anderson, writing for the centre-right website CapX, in which he blamed the Conservatives’ difficult period following the collapse of the budget and the Panama Papers on Oliver and Andrew Feldman, the Conservative party’s chair.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
  • Administration / Office
  • Arts and Culture
  • Board Member
  • Business / Corporate Services
  • Client / Customer Services
  • Communications
  • Construction, Works, Engineering
  • Education, Curriculum and Teaching
  • Environment, Conservation and NRM
  • Facility / Grounds Management and Maintenance
  • Finance Management
  • Health - Medical and Nursing Management
  • HR, Training and Organisational Development
  • Information and Communications Technology
  • Information Services, Statistics, Records, Archives
  • Infrastructure Management - Transport, Utilities
  • Legal Officers and Practitioners
  • Librarians and Library Management
  • Management
  • Marketing
  • OH&S, Risk Management
  • Operations Management
  • Planning, Policy, Strategy
  • Printing, Design, Publishing, Web
  • Projects, Programs and Advisors
  • Property, Assets and Fleet Management
  • Public Relations and Media
  • Purchasing and Procurement
  • Quality Management
  • Science and Technical Research and Development
  • Security and Law Enforcement
  • Service Delivery
  • Sport and Recreation
  • Travel, Accommodation, Tourism
  • Wellbeing, Community / Social Services
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

It’s not just a right-wing problem either. During the era of Ed Miliband, sympathetic commentators would call for him to hire “an Alastair Campbell type”, to sack his supposedly under-performing staff, who were “incapable” of communicating in an ordinary fashion. Writing for the New Statesman, Ian Leslie warned that because Miliband tended to recruit in his own image – hiring wonkish blokes from Oxford – he ran the risk of falling foul of dangerous groupthink.

Now, of course, this isn’t without merit. Cameron has fallen short of what his party’s right flank would like, particularly as many of his colleagues believe that Labour will be out of contention for another decade. Now he is free of coalition, Cameron has become more, not less, prone to drifting into avoidable crises, followed by messy U-Turns. And no-one would now dispute that Project Miliband fell victim to comforting groupthink before going down to a heavy defeat.

But Oliver, Llewellyn and Feldman haven’t kidnapped Samantha Cameron in order to force the Prime Minister to hire them – they remain in place because they reflect the type and style of politics Cameron prefers. Similarly, Miliband didn’t lose a bet, forcing him to hire identikit aides: those were the hires he wanted to make. 

 As Wentworth would have told Parliament if they’d been willing to listen, an adviser is just an adviser. The problem always begins and ends with the king.

This article is part of the New Statesman’s Monarchy Week. Find more here.

Content from our partners
What you need to know about private markets
Work isn't working: how to boost the nation's health and happiness
The dementia crisis: a call for action