Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Spotlight
  2. Devolution
13 January 2016updated 27 Jul 2021 6:59am

Labour’s attack on Zac Goldsmith for voting with the Tory whip is a terrible idea

The Tory mayoral candidate has been slammed by Labour for his loyal voting record.

By Anoosh Chakelian

Here is the Labour party’s latest attack ad against Zac Goldsmith, the Tory’s London mayoral candidate, in the form of a mock CV:

So much is wrong with this. The criticism of Goldsmith’s loyal voting record is the worst part.

The immediate suggestion is that Goldsmith has been too loyal, not enough of an independent thinker. A look at his Labour rival Sadiq Khan’s almost rebellion-free voting record is enough to undermine that. Khan even worked as a party whip in 2007-08.

So maybe the point is to highlight how Goldsmith has voted 90 per cent of the time with the Tories. Which is inherently bad, by Labour’s standards. The fact that Khan has been equally loyal to Labour is different, because voting with the Labour whip is the correct way to vote. But Labour and Khan’s campaign should not be taking for granted that London agrees with them, that it is a “Labour city”. Pointing out Goldsmith’s Tory-ness as a Bad Thing reveals this underlying complacency.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

According to the press briefing accompanying the ad’s release, the attempt is to paint Goldsmith as a “serial underachiever” for failing to be promoted, in spite of his voting discipline.

But the reason Goldsmith (a good speaker, fairly well-known, looks fine on telly – ministers have been appointed for far less) has never been given a government role is because of his vocal criticism of David Cameron and the government on Heathrow, the Recall Bill, Europe, and other subjects. He may be loyal according to his voting record, but pointing out his lack of a government role just highlights how much of an independent voice he’s been.

Content from our partners
How to create a responsible form of “buy now, pay later”
“Unions are helping improve conditions for drivers like me”
Transport is the core of levelling up

Voting record aside, this advert also conveys Labour’s belief that Goldsmith’s privilege will turn off London voters.

Although a Labour source insists “we will never criticise Zac Goldsmith for being born into wealth”, criticism of his wealth is implicit in this ad. The quotation about “left money by his daddy”. Pointing out that politics is a “family business” for Goldsmith. The accusation of nepotism. The use of his full, undeniably posh, name.

This is a foolish path for Labour to go down. The election – and previous elections – taught us that voters vote positively, out of aspiration rather than envy. The country has voted twice for David Cameron. London voters have chosen Boris Johnson twice as their mayor. Tell the story of Khan’s working-class immigrant family background, by all means. But don’t waste an opportunity to do so by calling Goldsmith posh. It doesn’t work.