New Times,
New Thinking.

  1. Business
22 April 2013updated 22 Oct 2020 3:55pm

Google’s approach to tax beats Starbucks’ hands down

Just how do you calibrate morality?

By New Statesman

Starbucks and Google have faced a great deal of criticism over their taxes, but while earlier this year Starbucks caved and made a “voluntary” offering on the altar of public opinion, Google has just come out on a very defensive wicket. Speaking on BBC Radio 4’s World at One, Google’s Eric Schmidt pointed out that the company’s tax affairs “fully comply with the law”:

Of course that omits the fact that we also hire more than 2,000 employees and are investing heavily in Britain.

Britain has been a very good market for us. We empower literally billions of pounds of start-ups through our advertising network and so forth. And we’re a key part of the electronic commerce expansion of Britain which is driving a lot of economic growth for the country.

So from our perspective I think… you have to look at it in totality. You’re describing the way taxes work globally. And the fact of the matter is these are the way taxes are done globally. The same is true for British firms operating in the US, for example.

I think the most important thing to say about our taxes is that we fully comply with the law and obviously, should the law change, we’ll comply with that as well.

Select and enter your email address Your weekly guide to the best writing on ideas, politics, books and culture every Saturday. The best way to sign up for The Saturday Read is via saturdayread.substack.com The New Statesman's quick and essential guide to the news and politics of the day. The best way to sign up for Morning Call is via morningcall.substack.com
Visit our privacy Policy for more information about our services, how Progressive Media Investments may use, process and share your personal data, including information on your rights in respect of your personal data and how you can unsubscribe from future marketing communications.
THANK YOU

Morality is hard to calibrate – and Schmidt makes a good point: what amounts to vague public distaste over large sums of money shouldn’t be allowed to confuse economic thinking.

Content from our partners
Unlocking investment in UK life sciences through manufacturing
Data defines a new era for fundraising
A prescription for success: improving the UK's access to new medicines