Support 100 years of independent journalism.

  1. Politics
7 December 2012updated 07 Sep 2021 11:54am

G4S security guards will not face prosecution in Jimmy Mubenga case

The asylum seeker died after being restrained by guards during deportation.

By Samira Shackle

The private security firm G4S has barely been out of the headlines this week, due to its chaotic handling of the Olympic security contract. It makes another appearance today – this time in relation to asylum seeker Jimmy Mubenga, who died after being restrained by G4S guards nearly two years ago.

Mubenga, a 46-year-old Angolan, was being deported on a British Airways flight from Heathrow in October 2010. The father of five was restrained by three G4S guards before losing consciousness. Eyewitnesses described him complaining that he could not breathe.

The three guards were arrested two days after the death, which was classified as “unexplained”. During a 17-month investigation, they have been bailed eight times. It was announced today that they will not face prosecution.

Explaining its decision, the CPS said that there was “insufficient evidence” to prove to a jury that:

. . . any potential breach of duty of care owed to Mr Mubenga was a ‘more than minimal’ cause of his death.

Sign up for The New Statesman’s newsletters Tick the boxes of the newsletters you would like to receive. A weekly newsletter helping you fit together the pieces of the global economic slowdown. Quick and essential guide to domestic and global politics from the New Statesman's politics team. The New Statesman’s global affairs newsletter, every Monday and Friday. The best of the New Statesman, delivered to your inbox every weekday morning. The New Statesman’s weekly environment email on the politics, business and culture of the climate and nature crises - in your inbox every Thursday. Our weekly culture newsletter – from books and art to pop culture and memes – sent every Friday. A weekly round-up of some of the best articles featured in the most recent issue of the New Statesman, sent each Saturday. A newsletter showcasing the finest writing from the ideas section and the NS archive, covering political ideas, philosophy, criticism and intellectual history - sent every Wednesday. Sign up to receive information regarding NS events, subscription offers & product updates.

The statement added that conflicting eyewitness accounts made it difficult to prove specifically that Mubenga was held in a “severely splinted” position – bent over with his diaphragm restricted – for long enough for asphyxiation.

The decision appears to have come down to a technicality. The CPS decision says that it was advised that a “breach of duty” did occur but that it was impossible to prove Mubenga was “severely splinted”. For anyone who has ever worked with asylum seekers and seen the inhumane treatment they routinely receive at the hands of authorities, this decision will come as little surprise. The complaints process very rarely ends in favour of deportees or detainees.

Content from our partners
“I learn something new on every trip"
How data can help revive our high streets in the age of online shopping
Why digital inclusion is a vital piece of levelling up

While Mubenga’s death was an extreme example, abuses during deportation are commonplace. Medical Justice published a report in 2008 that outlined nearly 300 allegations of such assaults. These included 42 deportees who complained of having their breathing restricted, several instances of neck injuries from having their heads pushed forward between their knees, and a punctured lung. In this context, it was merely a matter of time before somebody died.

In the time since Mubenga’s death, there’s been little evidence that the situation is improving. The contract for deportations was transferred from G4S to Reliance earlier this year but internal memos seen by the Guardian implied that little had changed. The documents referred to “loutish” and “aggressive” behaviour by staff and a culture of a lack of respect for women and ethnic minorities among some employees. In a damning conclusion, the memo said: “Is this a company where women, ethnic minorities and those of diverse religions feel comfortable? Evidence would suggest: no.” The Guardian also reported that since last May, there have been seven further incidents of alleged mistreatment of detainees.

Given that asylum seekers are frequently some of the most vulnerable people in the world, it should be a source of shame too many of them face such brutality at every step of the process in the UK. Sadly, that does not appear to be changing any time soon.